The former Argentine foreign ministers Rafael Bielsa, Jorge Taiana, Susana Malcorra, Felipe Solá and Santiago Cafiero signed a statement today in which they condemned the decision of the National Government to “not attend the commemorative event for the 40th anniversary of the Signing of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship” with Chile. The event will take place this Monday the 25th at the Vatican and will not have the presence of Gerardo Werthein.
The document states that it is “incomprehensible” that the president’s management Javier Mercy, have “a gesture of such gratuitous contempt” to one of the “most significant events of our diplomacy in the last half century.”
On the other hand, they recalled that the Treaty of Peace and Friendship with the trans-Andean country “Not only did it put an end to a meaningless rivalry with a town that was as neighboring as a brother, but it also opened a new chapter in history” of both nations, where “cooperation, exchange and the construction of mutual trust” were highlighted.
To finish, They indicated that “the marked disdain for the President’s foreign policy” for the best diplomatic traditions of our Republic “puts at risk decades of work and recognized leadership.”
“The Government’s decision is a clear contempt for papal diplomacy that has played a key role as the architect of peace in our region,” stated the former national officials.
Gerardo Werthein, brand new Chancellor of the libertarian administrationwas going to have his debut as an Argentine representative in a audience in the Vatican which will take place next Monday to remember the 40th anniversary of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Argentina and Chile. However, eventually the official will be absent. The mistake is attributed to the tensions that were generated between Javier Milei and the president of Chile, Gabriel Boricduring the summit of the G20 carried out in Brazil.
On the part of the Government, according to the newspaper La Nación, the official justification for the failure was “scheduling problems.” Werthein’s decision generated surprise in the Vatican because the hearing will be chaired by the papa Francisco and the Chilean Foreign Minister, Alberto van Klaveren, He had already confirmed his presence.
According to the media, Milei’s government informed the Secretariat of State of the Holy See that Werthein will not be able to be present at the ceremony that will take place in the Sala Regia of the Vatican. Despite citing “scheduling problems,” the absence is influenced by the tense intersection that, as it turned out, they maintained Boric and the libertarian leader during the last G20 summit.
In detail, the Vatican will commemorate the signing of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Argentina and Chile, which was the result of the mediation of John Paul II (Supreme Pontiff from 1978 to 2005) in the midst of a strong dispute between the two countries due to the conflict. of the Beagle. The agreement took place on November 29, 1984 and avoided what could have been a war between both States.
Source: Ámbito
* Considering the historical significance of the Beagle Conflict and the Vatican’s role in mediating its resolution, how might Argentina’s absence from this commemoration impact the credibility of its commitment to peaceful resolutions of future territorial disputes?
## World Today News Exclusive Interview: Argentina’s Absence at Chile Peace Treaty Anniversary
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we delve into the controversy surrounding Argentina’s decision to boycott the 40th-anniversary celebration of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship with Chile, a momentous event to be held at the Vatican. Joining us are two distinguished guests: **Dr. Maria Sanchez**, a renowned Latin American history professor specializing in Argentine-Chilean relations, and **Mr. Juan Perez**, a political analyst focusing on Argentine foreign policy.
**Section 1: Historical Significance and Diplomatic Impact**
* **Dr. Sanchez, the Treaty of Peace and Friendship is lauded as a cornerstone of regional diplomacy. What makes this agreement so significant, particularly in the context of the Beagle Conflict?**
* **Mr. Perez, how do you interpret Argentina’s decision to abstain from this commemoration? Does this action align with the country’s broader foreign policy objectives under the Milei administration?**
**Section 2: Papal Diplomacy and the Role of the Vatican**
* **Dr. Sanchez, the Vatican played a crucial role in mediating the Beagle Conflict. How might this absence be perceived by the Holy See and what are the potential implications for Vatican-Argentina relations?**
* **Mr. Perez, some speculate that the absence is a direct result of tensions between President Milei and Chilean President Boric stemming from the G20 summit. How credible is this explanation, and how might these tensions impact bilateral relations moving forward? **
**Section 3: Domestic Political Implications and Public Perception**
* **Dr. Sanchez, the former Argentine Foreign Ministers have strongly condemned the government’s decision. What are the potential domestic political ramifications of this controversy?**
* **Mr. Perez, how might the general public in Argentina react to the news of this boycott? Could this action affect public opinion on the Milei administration’s handling of foreign affairs?**
**Section 4: Looking Ahead: Future of Argentina-Chile Relations**
* **Dr. Sanchez, despite this setback, what are your thoughts on the long-term prospects for Argentina-Chile relations? Can this incident be overcome, and if so, how?**
* **Mr. Perez, what steps could be taken by both sides to de-escalate tensions and rebuild trust? What should be prioritized in the bilateral relationship going forward?**
**Conclusion:**
We thank Dr. Sanchez and Mr. Perez for their insightful analysis. This controversial decision raises important questions about Argentina’s approach to regional diplomacy, the legacy of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, and the future of bilateral relations between Argentina and Chile. Only time will tell how this situation will unfold and what long-term consequences it may have.
