Former Fianna Fáil Councillor Granted €4m Debt Write-Off by High Court.

The High Court has approved a €4 million debt write-off for a former Fianna Fáil councillor, who had been embroiled in a long-running legal battle with a bank. The decision has sparked controversy and raised questions about the fairness of debt forgiveness for those with political connections. This article will delve into the details of the case, its implications, and the broader debate surrounding debt forgiveness in Ireland.


The High Court has approved a personal insolvency arrangement for Eddie Mulligan, a former Fianna Fáil councillor and unsuccessful 2020 general election candidate, allowing him to write off €4 million in debts. The arrangement will also permit him to keep his family home on the outskirts of Waterford. Mulligan’s financial difficulties date back to the 2008 economic crash when his properties collapsed in value, leading to negative equity on his mortgages and the loss of rental income. His debts arose from money borrowed for property partnerships with his brother and another individual and from personal guarantees given in respect of loans on his family’s painting and decorating business. Mulligan’s wife’s hairdressing business also failed and was liquidated, causing further difficulties. Mulligan engaged personal insolvency practitioner Mitchell O’Brien to resolve his debts. Prior to the arrangement, Mulligan had debts totalling €4.8 million. EveryDay Finance, owed €2.75 million, will lose the largest sum of all his creditors, while Bank of Ireland is owed €1.4 million, according to Mulligan’s PIA.


In conclusion, the High Court’s decision to approve a €4m debt write-off for a former Fianna Fáil councillor has drawn criticism and raised questions about the justice system’s treatment of powerful and well-connected individuals. While some argue that the write-off sets a dangerous precedent and sends the wrong message about accountability, others argue that it is a necessary step towards resolving a complex and long-standing financial dispute. Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is clear that this case has brought to light deeper issues around political corruption and the intersection of money and power in Ireland’s politics. Ultimately, it will be up to citizens and policymakers to address these problems and work towards a fairer and more transparent system for all.