You have received a hearing sheet from the central administrative fine of the state of Brandenburg in Gransee because you exceeded the maximum speed permitted here outside of built-up areas.
If you exceed it by more than 20 km / h, you are threatened with a point and a driving ban from 26 km / h for a month. In addition to the fine, of course.
However, it doesn’t have to come to that.
The speed limits change depending on the construction activity. The signs were almost always considered sufficient by the responsible district court in Zossen.
However, the best and clearest arguments for the success of your objection are the sources of error in the single-sided sensor of the type ESO ES 8.0 used.
This speed camera registers the differences in brightness caused by the arriving vehicles. The data obtained from this enable the calculation of the travel time that is required for the entered measuring distance. If the limit value is exceeded, the camera is triggered.
However, this measurement method is extremely insecure.
Even the simplest light reflections, such as the shadow of your own or someone else’s vehicle, can have a negative impact on the measurement.
The pulsation of light from LED headlights is imperceptible to the human eye. However, in the case of the speed camera sensors, it also leads to irritation during data processing and thus to incorrect speed information.
Assignment problems occur, among other things, when overtaking and driving in a convoy. In this case, it is not possible for the fine department within the framework of legal proceedings to provide evidence that the alleged speed was actually driven by the vehicle shown.
The scan angle regulates the setting for the incline of the road. A deviation of just one degree leads to excessive measurement results. Even so, most errors occur when adjusting the device.
It is precisely for this reason that the manufacturer demands that the measuring staff be trained on their device. If there is no evidence of this in the file, the measurement cannot be a solid basis for a fine.
Often the calibration of the speed camera has expired. In such cases, the entire series of measurements is canceled and the person concerned acquitted.
This is only a small selection of the errors that can be found when evaluating your raw measurement data and measurement protocols.
Attorney Andreas Junge therefore obtains a technical report from one of the most recognized experts in Brandenburg for your measurement process. This lists the errors found and scientifically justifies their negative impact on the specified measurement data.
It is therefore the basis for applications for evidence with which the inaccuracy of your specific measurement is proven to the responsible district court of Bossen.
An acquittal follows or the proceedings are at least discontinued.
In this case, you will be spared points in the driving aptitude register (formerly the central traffic register) in Flensburg or even a driving ban.
If you have legal protection insurance, you will not incur any costs for the entire procedure.
Important: Report to a lawyer specializing in regulatory offense law at an early stage, ideally when you have received a hearing from the authority. The sooner you report, the more effective the defense. The location in another federal state is not an obstacle.
Attorney Young defends annually nationwide in approx. 1000 fine proceedings and he is a specialist lawyer for criminal law. This means that he has the knowledge and experience to advise and defend you optimally.
Just send an email or call Andreas Junge’s office.
The initial legal consultation is free of charge in any case!
You can also contact us at short notice via mobile phone: 01792346907. The usual messenger services are available.
–
