Home » today » World » fight against electoral obstruction

fight against electoral obstruction

HIt will be the most comprehensive electoral reform in decades, if it is Democrats You can get the bill through the Senate. By a majority of 220-210 votes, the House of Representatives approved, on Wednesday night, the “HR1” or “for the people” law. It is said to be the response to increasingly aggressive actions by Republican-ruled states that make it difficult for the people to vote. At the same time, it aims to repair the damage the Supreme Court has done to the historic 1965 electoral law from a Democratic perspective.

Donald Trump card He described the project at a Republican CPAC meeting last weekend as a “monster” that must be stopped. For both parties, a discussion of historic proportions is likely to have a decisive effect on the balance of power for decades to come.

The new law would force all states to allow early voting in person and voting by mail in all settings. All citizens will automatically register as voters. The so-called cleaning of the electoral register is prohibited by the federal government. In the past, for example, hundreds of thousands of citizens of Georgia or Ohio were discharged because they had not been their citizens for a long time. The right to vote They have benefited from it. In addition, people who have served a prison sentence should have the right to vote again. Election Day will be a national holiday so no one will be able to attend because of their work. All these measures would eliminate the blockade imposed on countries against voting. The practice of partisan blocking of electoral districts (“district division”) should also be prohibited.

The goal was to deprive the black population of their rights.

In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down important protections from the historic 1965 suffrage law. Since the Shelby County decision against Holder, states have been able to change their election laws again without the federal government considering whether this would lead to discrimination. . In many states until 1965, the restrictions were designed to deny black people their rights. There were electoral taxes and intimidation campaigns at the time of registration in the southern states. Not only were they illegal due to the Voting Rights Act, they could also be scrutinized and banned by the Washington Department of Justice.


Successful mobilization campaign: With the victories of Democrats Raphael Warnock (left) and John Usoff in the Georgia runoff in early January, Republicans lost their majority in the Senate.
:


Bild: AP


Ruth Bader GinsburgThe Supreme Court judge who passed away last year, contradicting the 2013 ruling, noted: “Canceling the federal review, although it worked against discrimination and still works, it’s like having your parachute in one to get rid of the storms because it doesn’t You haven’t done it since 2010, especially After the 2013 ruling, according to New York University’s Brennan Center, half of the states passed regulations that made voting difficult.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.