Handing over the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia is considered a formality, but FIFA has now officially given its blessing to the bid. The world association test report estimates that the risk is low in most of the points asked; even in the much debated case of human rights, the traffic light is only “yellow” for moderate danger. Overall, FIFA credits Saudi Arabia with a “unique, innovative and ambitious vision.” Overall rating: 4.2 out of 5.
At the virtual FIFA Congress on December 11, the 2034 World Cup and the 2030 World Cup will be discussed “en bloc”. Spain, Portugal and Morocco apart from Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay should go, to decide. According to reports, the award will be decided by recommendation. According to the assessment, all centers meet the minimum standards.
Saudi Arabia: Between criticism and euphoria
The application Saudi Arabia widely criticized in the Western world. FIFA, on the other hand, tries to present a positive image, accepting “that the application offers significant opportunities to have a positive impact on human rightsIn addition, the assessment states: “There isThere is great potential for the competition to act as a catalyst for some of the ongoing and future reforms and contribute to positive human rights outcomes for the people of Saudi Arabia and the region.“.
The test report does not definitively clarify the time of the event and, like the candidates, refers to the vague game calendar for 2034. However, the weather in summer is considered dangerous, and as in Qatar in 2022, the World Cup in So it seems likely that Saudi Arabia will take place at the end of autumn taking place in the winter. FIFA assigns a “yellow” level to the “time of event” point, but the traffic light for the controversial stability point is green.
2024-11-30 22:59:00
#FIFA #trial #report #Green #light #World #Cup #Flashscore.de
## FIFA Greenlights Saudi Arabia’s 2034 world Cup Bid Despite Human Rights Concerns
**FIFA has officially endorsed Saudi Arabia’s bid to host the 2034 World Cup, marking a potential turning point in global football politics.** The world football governing body’s test report praises the bid’s “unique, innovative and ambitious vision,” awarding it a score of 4.2 out of 5. While the decision isn’t final—it will be formally voted on at the December 11 FIFA Congress alongside the 2030 bid—this move signals a strong likelihood of Saudi Arabia securing the tournament, despite ongoing criticism regarding human rights issues in the country.
To unpack the implications of this growth, we’re joined by two seasoned experts: **Dr. anya Sharma,** a leading scholar on sports geopolitics and author of “The Shifting Sands of Football Diplomacy,” and **Simon Harrison**, a former FIFA ethics committee member and outspoken advocate for human rights in sport.
**Where Does Football Diplomacy Stand After Saudi Arabia’s Endorsement?**
**dr.Sharma:** FIFA’s decision reflects a broader trend of major sporting events being awarded to countries with meaningful economic clout and strategic ambitions. While human rights concerns are rightfully raised, the allure of expanding football’s reach into new markets and securing lucrative broadcasting deals frequently enough overshadows these considerations. The Saudi bid’s emphasis on modernization and infrastructural development is undoubtedly appealing from FIFA’s perspective.
**Simon Harrison:** I believe FIFA is making a dangerous gamble by overlooking the deeply troubling human rights situation in Saudi Arabia.
**This is not merely about sports; it’s about sending a message that authoritarian regimes can use major events to whitewash their records.** While FIFA claims the World cup could act as a catalyst for social change, history has shown that such events rarely lead to lasting improvements in human rights.
**How Will the World Cup Impact Human Rights in Saudi Arabia?**
**Dr. Sharma:** It’s a complex issue. While there’s a risk of “sportswashing,” there’s also potential for positive pressure from FIFA and the international community. The spotlight on Saudi Arabia during the tournament could force the government to address some of its human rights violations.
**Simon harrison:** I’m deeply skeptical.
**FIFA has a history of turning a blind eye to human rights abuses.** We’ve seen it in Qatar, and I fear we’re about to witness a repeat performance in Saudi Arabia. The government is likely to use the World Cup to legitimize its oppressive policies and further silence dissent.
**what Are the Practical Implications for Future World Cup Bids?**
**Dr. Sharma:** The Saudi bid sets a precedent that could incentivize other nations with problematic human rights records to launch similar campaigns. FIFA needs to establish clearer and more robust human rights criteria for future bids and ensure independant monitoring mechanisms are in place.
**Simon Harrison:** This decision threatens to further undermine the integrity of the bidding process. If money and political influence outweigh human rights considerations, FIFA risks becoming irrelevant and losing the trust of fans worldwide.
**Looking Ahead: A World cup in the Desert Heat**
**FIFA’s test report points to the possibility of a winter World Cup in Saudi Arabia to mitigate the extreme summer temperatures. What are your thoughts on this?**
**Dr.sharma:** A winter World Cup is likely, just as we saw in Qatar. This would disrupt domestic leagues across the globe and perhaps put further strain on player welfare. **
**Simon Harrison:** It’s a symptom of the broader problem: FIFA prioritizing profit and convenience over the well-being of players and fans.Football should not be played in such unnatural conditions.
**Where do we go from here? What can fans and stakeholders do?**
**Dr. Sharma:**
Fan activism and pressure on sponsors can play a crucial role in holding FIFA accountable. It’s essential for fans to continue raising awareness about human rights concerns and demanding greater clarity from the organization.
**Simon Harrison**
We must demand more from FIFA. We need to push for a fundamental shift in its priorities, one that places human rights and ethical
*considerations above profit and political expediency.* The future of football depends on it.
**Key Takeaways:**
* FIFA’s endorsement of Saudi Arabia’s World Cup bid sparked controversy due to ongoing human rights concerns.
* Experts remain divided on the potential impact of the tournament on Saudi Arabia’s human rights landscape.
* the decision highlights the need for FIFA to establish clearer human rights criteria and independent monitoring mechanisms for future bids.
**What are your thoughts on FIFA’s decision? Share your opinions in the comments section below!**
**For further reading, explore our coverage on:**
* The ethical dilemmas of sportswashing.
* The impact of mega-events on host countries.
* The future of FIFA: Reform or decline?
