Gérald Darmanin, the Minister of the Interior, decided to seize the General Inspectorate of the National Police (IGPN), the “Font of fonts”
, because of the gray areas that continue to hover over the assassination of Chahinez Daoud, 31 years old, on May 4, 2021 by her husband, in Mérignac (Gironde). In particular on the way in which the complaint lodged by this mother of three children, almost two months before (on March 15), was treated.
A few days ago, The chained Duck revealed that the police officer who recorded this complaint, had himself been sentenced, on February 10, to an eight-month suspended prison sentence for violence committed against his wife. And was waiting to go before the disciplinary council.
Information that did not have the general inspectorates of Justice and the Administration which carried out a mission in May on this feminicide. The hierarchy of this policeman should not have left him in contact with the public. What only makes me angry is that this information was withheld from the inspection we ordered.
, fulminates Gérald Darmanin in an interview with Parisian. If these elements have been knowingly
concealed, sanctions will be taken
, warns the minister.
“Inconsistencies and contradictions”
The police officer’s conviction raises other questions: can it explain a part breaches
observed in this case? On March 15, Chahinez Daoud had filed a complaint at the Mérignac police station while the same day, her husband, Moonir Boutaa, had tried to strangle him in his van, in the parking lot of a hypermarket. And this, while he had already been sentenced, in June 2020, to eighteen months in prison (including nine suspended sentences) for violence committed on his wife in a state of recidivism. And with the prohibition to come into contact with the victim.
Following the complaint filed on March 15, the police officer sent an email to the prosecution. But this email included inconsistencies and contradictions
, note the first inspection carried out on this drama.
The letter sent to the prosecutor thus included the assessment grids of the danger and the victim’s personality. But not the complaint. One of the grids also contained errors: the answer was “no” to the fact of knowing if any offenses had already been committed against this woman …
This case has many other inconsistencies. Since March 18, the police had disseminated a local fact sheet against the violent husband.
However, on March 29, the latter went to the Mérignac police station to complain about not being able to see his children. And it is the agent who registered the complaint of the wife, who that day had recommended to the husband to leave the place. Not having carried out an identity check, he would not have known that he was in the presence of the wanted man …
The report of the fonts font
is expected within six weeks.
– .
