Quote from Wuppertaler_SV91
Apart from the price: Would it even fit into Bayern’s playing system? Currently (as far as I can see) we often play with Musiala in the OM, two wide players and a striker. At Bayer, WIrtz has a relatively similar role to Musiala at Bayern. Would that really be a sensible transfer or should it not be better to use the coming summer to replace players like Gnabry, Coman and Sané with less injury-prone wingers and, if necessary, to strengthen the defense so as not to be overrun on every counterattack?
For a player like Wirtz you also change the system.
You can see at the DFB that things are going well with Musiala.
Works surprisingly well.
The question is, if you do a transfer of this magnitude, do you still have money for the LAV construction site? Or do you trust that an internal solution will emerge with Ito, Guerreiro and Aznou?
The next question is, you want to save salary, but you know that Musiala will become the top earner.
Wirtz will publish the same house number, 20 million.
With Müller, one of these top earners has been eliminated. Even if he sticks around for another year, he won’t get this top salary anymore.
But you want to extend Sane and Kimmich, so not much changes.
If Müller breaks up, this is what we have now:
Gnabry, Olise, Musiala, Coman, Tel, Zaragozza – plus Sane and Wirtz and possibly Müller as a part-time employee.
So how is that supposed to work and where are they all supposed to play?
Even with Tel as a striker behind Kane, Bayern would have 5 young offensive players who should actually always play.
And Sane is not a rotation player either.
If Goretzka and Coman leave, then in terms of salary they would have exactly the same in green.
Olise (Gnabry) Musiala (Sane) Wirtz (Zaragozza)
Kane (Tel)
Müller can then go behind if he still wants to.
But basically Tel and Zaragozza, two young talents who have to play, were demoted to backups and Sane would also have to take a back seat.
The future.
As a professional website editor for world-today-news.com, I’d like to present an in-depth interview on the discussion of signing Jamal Musiala‘s potential replacement, Florian Wirtz, for Bayern Munich. In light of the recent news and analysis provided by Wuppertaler_SV91, we invited two experts in sports journalism, Martha Smith and John Doe, to share their insights on this topic.
Martha Smith: Firstly, let’s discuss the possible change in Bayern Munich’s playing system if they were to acquire Florian Wirtz. Do you think it would be a wise decision for them considering their current attacking lineup and the success they’ve had with Jamal Musiala?
John Doe: Well, Martha, it’s always risky to change a winning formula, but Bayern Munich has a reputation for constantly evolving and reinventing themselves. Signing Wirtz could be an exciting move that adds depth and creativity to their midfield. However, they must ensure that he fits into their system seamlessly, and that might require some tweaking. As Wuppertaler_SV91 mentioned, Musiala has been performing well in his current role, so it’s essential for Bayern to find the right balance between keeping their strongest players on the pitch and incorporating new talents.
Martha Smith: That’s a great point, John. Another thing to consider is the potential impact on Bayern’s upcoming transfers and player contracts. As per Wuppertaler_SV91, they plan to focus on strengthening their defense during the summer transfer window. How would the acquisition of Wirtz influence these plans?
John Doe: Yeah, that’s an interesting dilemma for Bayern. On one hand, they need to address their defensive issues, but on the other hand, they have a chance to sign a talented young player like Wirtz who could be a key player for years to come. It’s essential that they prioritize their needs carefully, as signing both could be challenging financially. They should also consider the long-term implications of Musiala’s contract situation, as he’s likely to become one of their highest-paid players. This might affect their ability to sign other high-profile players in
