Facebook sponsors a seller of slippers and regularly offers me to buy some.
The Sabah slipper made in Turkey...
Perfect for going to the mosque, but still charged 185 pounds…
So I wondered what Facebook wanted on my feet, why they wanted to make me a slippery believer in 72 virgins…
Facebook explains, from this point of view, why it is targeting such user to such advertising.
In this case, Facebook learned from my internet consultations and online purchases that I like shoes and leather…
True that I like beautiful leather shoes. From there to wearing slippers like a muz that goes to the mosque…
The current fashion is for fabric shoes. The “top of the top” is to wear with any garment, even a suit, immaculate white sneakers.
This immaculate white must be ostentatious, of total purity to conform to the canons of fashion, “jump to the eye”. He is the symbol of a virginal being who has no past, partridge of the year from head to toe…
This is Macronian fashion, that of Justin Bieber and his fiancée received with great pomp by Néron at the Elysée...
https://resistancerepublicaine.com/2021/06/22/macron-recoit-justin-bieber-a-lelysee/
We pass for “old fashion” with leather shoes, a little less certainly when the work has been worked to take on a whimsical aesthetic. But whoever doesn’t have more “sneakers” than leather shoes in their closets is supposed to belong to the 20th century…
It is however a stake of civilization. Leather shoes, more robust, more elegant, express the domination of those who wear them over their environment..
Leather ages, like human skin, by crumpling; it must be taken care of like a precious object, waxing it, letting it dry after the rain for several days…
Leather shoes, the real ones, signify a choice of values and their nobility predestines them to accompany a costume, a garment worn occasionally during an important event or within the framework of the exercise of social functions taken seriously, even if the leather shoe is also intended to be worn daily by everyone, except when carrying out dirty work or whose material technicality requires special shoes.
Nevertheless, the latest fashion for white trainers sometimes reaches this reserved area of leather shoes, when worn with a suit to create a purely sartorial provocation which is very often a sign of great conformism…
First, it was necessary to recover the skin on an animal. Leather is the prerogative of human beings, expressing their domination of the animal world.
Whoever wears leather shoes, which he only puts on in principle to leave his home, or on the contrary to receive, in any case to come into contact with the other, society, affirms his belonging to the human race, characterized by first by the domination of the animal as an element of a nature that it has also and more globally learned to dominate as such.
Greens do not normally wear leather shoes for this reason.. They prefer shoes made of cotton, recycled plastic recovered from the sea… but can tolerate “responsible leather” of non-animal origin. https://resilience-ecologique.com/7-marques-de-chaussures-ecologiques-et-ethiques/
Indeed, we now find vegetable leather and imitation leather, but leather will always remain linked to this idea of the superiority of human beings.
The leather shoe is not devoid of a connotation of authority. A military parade in sneakers or slippers seems inconceivable…
At least, no doubt our authorities would like the military to put on slippers, but they could not give a semblance of seriousness during their parades and therefore for the moment, it is not on the program… We must at least give the illusion that nothing has changed…
The leather shoe has character, what do you want! and is particularly suitable for assertive personalities. On the contrary, the slipper only expresses submission to Islam.
Then, its second-skin resistance gives a feeling of confidence. It protects more the foot which carries it, which supports the human being, of which it reinforces a feeling to have the right to exist and to have its word to say.
The babouche, this kind of leather slipper, has nothing to do with the leather shoes that I like and even collect.
First, it does not support the foot, which it prevents from walking quickly or running, unlike a real leather shoe, which despite its dressy character, can sometimes help the man in a hurry, busy catching up with his train or his plane before departure. Leather makes it possible to ward off all social dangers, even if those who wear leather shoes will be careful not to be late and therefore know that by putting them on, they are committing to being punctual and thus respectful of others, the leather shoe that doesn’t like running although she tolerates it occasionally (error being human and no one is safe from the danger that makes you run for it!)
The babouche, unlike the real leather shoe, is not a conqueror’s shoe, but literally a slipper shoe.
It certainly expresses a superiority over the animal, but over the tortured animal, eaten halal of which it is ultimately only a cultic food remnant.
It has a religious connotation which makes it indecent to offer it for sale to the non-Muslim public.
This comes from a French sensibility; we feel hurt in our secularism and insulted in our identity when we are offered slippers.
Coarse, devoid of laces, finishing, of a primary confection, the cultic food remains that is the slipper is the symbol of a discounted spirituality.
In Facebook’s globalist porridge, we can offer a slipper to anyone, considering its only material and its nature which vaguely resembles a shoe, although it is rather a slipper; “a savate”.
It is not a fashion accessory and it is too ideologically connoted to be trivialized. And that, the globalized artificial intelligence of Facebook’s advertisements will never be able to understand… unless Zuckerberg doesn’t care and finds the globalization of slippers and the Islam that goes with it brilliant.
490 total views, 490 views today
