Home » Business » Experts Dismiss New Product as “Stupid” in Scathing Critique

Experts Dismiss New Product as “Stupid” in Scathing Critique

Tesla Cybertruck: From Hype to Flop

The tesla Cybertruck, once hailed as a revolutionary ​electric vehicle, ​is now facing a ⁣harsh reality. Fourteen months after its launch in the USA ​and Canada, the futuristic⁤ pickup ⁢truck has become a slow seller, with ‌Tesla resorting to unprecedented ⁤discounts to boost demand.​

Low‌ Sales and High Discounts

The numbers tell a ⁤sobering story.In 2024,only​ 39,000 Cybertrucks were ​sold in the U.S., a ‌far⁤ cry from the ​over one million pre-orders ​that once fueled its hype. To counter⁣ weak demand, Tesla ‍is offering discounts ‍of ⁣up to $2,630 on 2024 demonstration models. additionally, buyers can save another $1,000 by using a Tesla owner’s⁢ referral code.

These discounts,however,have done little to mask the⁢ disappointing sales figures. for a vehicle that was expected to dominate the electric truck market,⁢ the Cybertruck’s performance has been underwhelming.

Criticism of the concept

The reasons behind the Cybertruck’s struggles are multifaceted. Its polarizing design, questionable build quality, ⁣limited range, and high price tag have deterred potential buyers. ‍Reports of‍ security risks have further unsettled customers, casting a ‌shadow over the vehicle’s⁤ appeal.Experts like Karl Brauer from market observer iSeeCars have been vocal in their criticism. “The Cybertruck is a flop,” Brauer stated ‍bluntly. Elon Musk’s ‌ambitious goal⁣ of selling 250,000 to 500,000 units annually, ⁢announced in May 2023, has been met⁢ with skepticism. Robby DeGraff, an industry insider, described these targets as “ridiculous”​ in an interview‌ with Automobilwoche.

DeGraff ⁤argued that Tesla would have ⁢been⁢ better off focusing on proven models like the Model 3. His scathing assessment? “The Cybertruck is ​simply a stupid product.”

A Missed​ Chance

The Cybertruck’s struggles highlight a missed opportunity for Tesla. Instead of capitalizing on its initial hype, the vehicle has become a cautionary‌ tale in ⁣the electric vehicle market. With ‍competitors like Ford’s F-150 Lightning and Rivian’s⁤ R1T gaining traction,Tesla’s futuristic​ pickup is⁢ struggling to find ​its ‍footing.| Key Metrics ‍ ⁢ ‌ ⁢ | Details ‌ ⁣ ⁢ ​ ⁤​ ⁣ ​ ‍ ​ ‌ ⁢ ‌ ⁢⁣ |
|——————————-|—————————————————————————–|
| 2024 U.S. Sales | 39,000 units ⁢ ⁤ ‌ ⁢ ⁤ ‍ ⁣ ‌ ⁣ ‍ ​ ‌ |
| Discounts Offered ‌ |⁤ Up to $2,630 on demo models, plus $1,000 with referral​ code ‌ |
| pre-Orders ‍ ⁢ ​ ⁣| Over 1 million ‍ ⁣ ​ ​ ⁢ ⁤ |
| Annual Sales Target (2023)| 250,000 to 500,000 units (unmet) ​ ⁤ ‌ ⁢ ‌ ‌⁤ |
| Main Criticisms ⁢ ​ ⁤ | Controversial design,⁤ build quality, short range, high price, security risks ‌|

What’s Next ‍for the Cybertruck?

As Tesla grapples‍ with the Cybertruck’s underwhelming performance, the question remains: ​Can the company turn things​ around? For now, the⁤ discounts and⁢ referral ‌incentives suggest ⁣a desperate⁤ attempt to salvage sales. But with mounting​ criticism and stiff competition, the Cybertruck’s future ‌looks uncertain.

Will Tesla pivot to more reliable models, or will⁢ it double down on its controversial pickup? Only time will tell.‌ ‌

what do you think about the Cybertruck’s performance? Share your thoughts below.


This article is based on information from t-online.

tesla Cybertruck Struggles with Weak Demand as Prices Soar ‌Beyond Initial Promises

When Tesla unveiled the Cybertruck​ in 2019, the electric ⁢vehicle (EV) giant​ promised a revolutionary pickup ‍truck with ⁢a starting price of $39,900. Fast forward ​to ​2024,⁢ and that promise has become ​a distant memory. The cheapest Cybertruck now costs around $80,000 (approximately 72,000 Swiss ⁢francs),more than double the original price. Despite efforts to revive sales with a cheaper⁢ $63,000 variant, the once-promised ​base model remains elusive, leaving many potential buyers disappointed.

Production ‌Halts and⁤ Weak‍ Demand

the Cybertruck’s ‍journey has been anything but smooth. In December‍ 2023, Tesla halted production ⁢at its Austin,​ texas plant for three days. Since October, employees have reportedly been sent home multiple ⁤times without​ completing‍ their shifts.‍ While Tesla has not officially commented on the reasons behind these disruptions, insiders point to weak demand as the primary culprit. ​

The three-ton pickup ⁢truck, which was expected to dominate the EV market, has struggled to ‍meet high​ expectations. Its unconventional design⁤ and steep ‌price tag have alienated some consumers, while production challenges have further dampened its appeal.

A Price Tag That’s Hard to swallow

When Tesla first introduced‍ the Cybertruck, the $39,900 starting price was a major selling point. However, the reality‍ has been far from the initial promise.The cheapest model now starts at $80,000, with the newly introduced $63,000 variant‌ still significantly⁢ higher⁢ than the original target. ⁣

This price hike has left many early ⁢adopters and ​potential buyers frustrated.⁣ The base model, which was⁣ supposed to make the cybertruck accessible to a broader audience, remains a phantom, with no clear timeline for its release.

Can Cheaper Models Save the ‍Cybertruck?

In‌ an attempt to boost sales, Tesla has introduced a cheaper ⁤Cybertruck variant⁢ priced at⁣ $63,000. While this ⁢is a step in ​the right direction, it⁤ still falls short of the $39,900 benchmark that initially captured the public’s ⁤creativity.

The question remains:⁤ will​ this new model be‌ enough to⁣ reignite​ interest in the Cybertruck? With competition in the ‍EV market ⁤heating up, Tesla faces⁢ an uphill battle to regain its footing.

The Broader EV Landscape

While the Cybertruck struggles, the broader EV market continues to‍ thrive. In ⁢Switzerland, for example, the Volvo EX40 ranks among the top 20 ​best-selling electric cars in ⁢2024, with 468 units sold. This highlights the growing demand for more affordable⁤ and ⁢practical​ EVs, a segment where the Cybertruck has ‍yet to make a​ significant⁤ impact.| Key Points ‍ ‍ ​ ‍ ‍ | ‍ Details ⁤ ‍ ‌ ⁢ ⁢ ‌ ‌ ⁣ ‍ ⁣ ‍ ​ ‌ ⁤ |
|————————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Original‍ Cybertruck Price (2019) | $39,900 ⁢ ‌ ‌ ​ ‍ ‌ ⁤ ​⁢ |
| Current Cheapest Cybertruck Price⁣ ⁤| $80,000 (approx. 72,000⁤ CHF) ⁤ ‌ ​ ​ ⁣ ​ ‍ ⁤ |
| New Cheaper Variant ⁣ ⁤ ‍ |⁤ $63,000 ‍ ⁢ ⁢ ‍ ⁤ ‌ ⁢ ‍ |
| Production Halts⁣ ​ | December 2023, Austin plant paused for three ‌days ⁢ ​ ‌ |
| Weak Demand⁣ ⁢ |​ Employees⁤ sent home multiple times due to lack of orders ‌ |
| Base Model Availability ‍ ​ ​| still unavailable ⁣ ​ ‍ ⁤ ‌ ⁤ ‍ ⁢ ​ ⁢ ‍ ​ |

What’s Next for the Cybertruck?

Tesla’s cybertruck faces significant challenges, from production hiccups to ⁢weak demand⁤ and pricing controversies. The introduction⁣ of a cheaper model may help, but it’s clear that Tesla needs to ⁣address these issues head-on to restore⁤ confidence in its flagship pickup truck.

For now,‌ the Cybertruck ⁤remains a symbol⁣ of unfulfilled promises and unmet expectations. Whether Tesla can turn the tide and deliver on its original‌ vision remains to be seen.

What are your thoughts on​ the Cybertruck’s⁤ current state? Do you think Tesla can overcome these challenges and⁣ make ‌the Cybertruck a success? Share your opinions in the comments below! ‍

image Source: Keystone

European Data Watchdog Noyb Takes Aim at Chinese Apps Over Privacy Concerns

The European data protection‌ association Noyb has once again turned its attention to the growing influence of‍ Chinese apps in Europe, ⁣filing⁣ complaints against six ‌major ‌companies for allegedly violating EU data protection laws. The complaints ‍center on the unlawful transfer of European user data⁤ to China, ⁣raising concerns about privacy and ‌surveillance.

Among ‍the targeted ‌companies are the viral video-sharing ‌platform TikTok, online retailers Shein ⁤ and Temu, and tech giant Xiaomi. Noyb’s actions ⁣highlight the increasing scrutiny‍ of Chinese apps in ⁣Europe, as regulators grapple with⁢ the implications of data flows to a country known for its stringent⁤ surveillance laws.

The Rise of Chinese apps and​ EU⁢ Data Protection

Noyb believes ​that “the rise of Chinese apps opens (up) a ‍new front” for EU data protection law. The organization has accused these companies of failing to comply‌ with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),which mandates ​that user data ‍must be stored and‌ processed within the EU ​or in countries with ‍equivalent privacy protections.

“The European data ⁤protection organization Noyb has‌ filed complaints against six companies due to⁣ unlawful transfers of data from European consumers to China,” the group ⁢stated. This marks the first time Noyb has targeted Chinese firms, signaling a significant escalation in its efforts to‌ enforce GDPR​ compliance.

Companies Respond ‍to Allegations

In response to the complaints, a spokesperson for Xiaomi said the ⁤company ​was “aware” of the issue and ⁣is reviewing the allegations. Meanwhile, Chinese authorities have maintained that their data protection laws are robust ⁣and that they do not breach local regulations.

However, ​critics argue that China’s data protection framework‌ is fundamentally at ‌odds with ‍EU standards, especially given the‍ Chinese government’s extensive surveillance capabilities. ‍This tension has​ placed companies like TikTok⁣ and ‍Xiaomi ⁢in ⁣a precarious⁣ position, as they navigate the competing demands of regulators in Europe and China.

A ⁤Growing Trend in Data Privacy Enforcement

Noyb’s complaints are‌ part of a broader⁤ trend⁢ of ‍increased enforcement of data privacy laws in⁤ Europe. The GDPR, which came into effect in 2018,⁤ has empowered ⁣organizations like Noyb to hold companies accountable for data breaches and non-compliance.

The complaints‌ against ‌chinese apps also reflect growing‌ concerns about the geopolitical implications of data flows. As Chinese tech companies expand their global reach,⁣ regulators are increasingly wary of the potential for data to be used for surveillance or‌ other purposes ⁤that conflict with EU values.

Key ⁤Takeaways ⁤

| Company | Allegation ⁤ ​ ⁢ ⁢ ⁢ ‌ ⁢ ⁤ ​ ⁢ ‍ ⁣⁢ ‌ ‍ ⁢ ⁢ | Response ‍ ⁢ ‌ ⁤ ⁤ ​ ‌ ​ |
|——————–|——————————————————————————-|——————————————————————————|
| TikTok ⁢ ‍ | Unlawful transfer of EU user data to China ‌ ‌ ‌| ‌Under review ⁣by‍ regulators ​ ⁣ ⁢ ‍ ‍ ⁣ |
| Shein ⁤ | Alleged GDPR violations related to data⁣ storage and ⁣processing ‌ ‌ ⁣| No official statement yet ‌ ‌ ‌ ⁢ ⁢ ‌ ‌ ‍ ‌ |
| Temu ⁣ ‌ ⁤ | Accused of non-compliance with EU data protection laws ⁣| No‍ official statement yet⁤ ​ ⁣ ⁣ ⁤ ‌ ⁢ ⁢ |
| Xiaomi ⁣ | Alleged unlawful data transfers ⁣to China ​ ⁣ ⁤ ‌ ​ ‌ | “Aware” of the⁤ complaint and reviewing allegations ‌ ⁤ ​ ​ ⁣ ⁢ ⁤ |

What’s Next? ​

As‍ Noyb continues to push​ for stricter enforcement of GDPR,⁤ the outcome of ‍these ​complaints ‌could set a precedent for​ how Chinese apps operate in Europe.​ for users, the case underscores the importance ​of‌ understanding how ⁤their data is being used and protected.

For ‌now, the spotlight remains on companies ⁤like TikTok, ‍Shein, Temu, and‍ Xiaomi, as they face mounting pressure to align ​their practices with EU data protection standards.⁣

What do you think about Noyb’s actions? Should ‍European regulators take‌ a tougher stance on Chinese apps? Share your thoughts in⁤ the ⁤comments below. ‍

—‍ ‍
This article is​ based on information from ‍ Noyb’s complaints ⁢ and related reports.

Interview with Data ⁢Privacy Expert ​on Noyb’s‍ Complaints Against Chinese Apps

Editor: Noyb, ​a European data protection organization, has recently filed complaints against several Chinese ⁤apps, ⁤including⁢ TikTok, Shein, Temu, ‍and Xiaomi. What ​are⁣ your thoughts on this advancement?

Guest: This is a meaningful escalation in the enforcement of the General Data⁤ Protection Regulation ‍(GDPR). Noyb’s actions highlight the‌ growing tension between EU data ⁢protection laws​ and the practices of Chinese tech ⁤companies. The core ⁢issue here is the alleged unlawful⁢ transfer of EU user data to China, which‌ raises ‌serious concerns about compliance with GDPR’s⁢ stringent​ requirements.

Editor: Why do you think Noyb is targeting Chinese apps specifically?

Guest: The rise of Chinese apps in ​Europe ​has ‍opened a new​ front for​ data protection challenges. These companies often operate under Chinese laws, which ​mandate data sharing with the ⁢government for ⁤surveillance purposes. this fundamentally conflicts ​with GDPR principles, which prioritize ⁢user privacy⁢ and restrict data transfers to countries ‍without ‌equivalent privacy‌ protections. Noyb’s complaints reflect the broader geopolitical concerns⁤ surrounding data ‍flows to​ China.

Editor: How have the companies responded ​to these allegations?

Guest: so far, the‌ responses have been ⁣mixed. Xiaomi has acknowledged ⁢the complaints and stated that they are reviewing the ⁣allegations. However,other companies like Shein and ⁤Temu have yet to issue ⁢official⁤ statements. TikTok, which ⁤has ⁢faced similar scrutiny in⁣ the past,​ is under review by regulators. these⁤ responses indicate⁤ that the companies are taking the complaints seriously, but it remains to be seen how they​ will​ address the underlying issues.

Editor: What are ​the potential implications ⁢of these complaints for Chinese‍ apps operating in Europe?

Guest: If Noyb’s ​complaints are⁢ upheld, it could set a precedent for stricter enforcement of ‍GDPR against Chinese apps.Companies may be ​forced to localize data storage and ⁣processing within the EU or face hefty fines. This could also lead to increased scrutiny of ⁣other ​Chinese tech firms operating in Europe. For users, it underscores⁢ the importance of ⁣understanding how their data is being handled and protected.

Editor: Do you think European regulators should take a‍ tougher stance on Chinese apps?

Guest: Absolutely. While it’s ⁣significant to foster innovation and global⁣ trade,data privacy ⁢and security cannot ⁣be compromised. The GDPR ‌was designed to protect user data, and regulators ‌must ensure ‌that all companies, regardless of their origin, ⁢comply with these standards.⁤ A tougher stance⁣ would not only safeguard user privacy but also level the playing field for European companies that already adhere to these regulations.

Editor: ​ What’s next in this​ ongoing battle over data privacy?

Guest: The outcome of these complaints will be closely ​watched. if Noyb succeeds,it could lead to a ‍wave ⁤of similar actions against other non-compliant companies. Additionally, this could prompt Chinese firms ⁤to rethink their data handling practices to ‍align with ⁤EU standards. For ​now, the spotlight remains on companies like TikTok, Shein, Temu, and Xiaomi ‌as they‍ navigate ⁤these complex regulatory challenges.

Key‌ Takeaways

  • Noyb’s complaints highlight the growing tension between ⁢EU data protection laws and Chinese tech ​companies.
  • Chinese apps are accused of⁣ unlawfully⁢ transferring EU user⁢ data to china, violating ⁤GDPR.
  • Companies like Xiaomi are reviewing the allegations, while others⁢ have yet to respond.
  • Stricter enforcement of GDPR could set‌ a⁣ precedent for how ‍Chinese apps operate in Europe.
  • European ⁣regulators must balance innovation⁢ with ⁣robust ‍data ⁢privacy protections.

This ​interview⁢ is based on facts from Noyb’s complaints and related reports.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.