Home » News » Expert Patwal Value for Special Presidential Envoys Under Review: Key Insights and Implications

Expert Patwal Value for Special Presidential Envoys Under Review: Key Insights and Implications

Jakarta ⁢Traffic patrols Under Scrutiny: Calls for Policy Review ‍Amid Public Outcry

jakarta’s bustling streets have become the center of a heated debate following ​a viral video showing⁣ a traffic patrol escorting a car with‍ the license plate RI 36,belonging to the President’s Special Envoy ⁢for the young Generation and ⁣Arts ‍Workers,Raffi ahmad. The incident, which unfolded ​on Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, has sparked calls for a review of the patwal system,with experts and citizens‍ alike questioning its efficiency and necessity. ‌

Professor Ulung Pribadi, ⁣a ⁣Public Administration‍ expert at Muhammadiyah University‌ of Yogyakarta⁣ (UMY), has weighed in on ⁤the ‍controversy. “Reviewing this policy will ensure efficiency and targeted use. The review ‌is also vital ⁣to minimize⁣ the potential for misuse of state⁤ facilities by ⁤officials,”‌ he stated in an interview with‌ ANTARA. Prof.Ulung emphasized⁣ that patwal services ⁣should be reserved for officials with high⁢ urgency in their​ state⁢ duties, ‍such as the President, Vice ‌President,⁣ or those directly⁣ involved ⁤in national⁣ security.

The viral video‌ captured a patrol officer attempting ⁤to clear the road for the RI 36 car amidst heavy traffic. A taxi ‌driver,⁣ obstructed by ‍the ‌maneuver,‌ was pointed at ⁢by the⁤ officer, further fueling ‍public discontent. Prof. Ulung believes that granting patwal to officials whose duties are not ⁢urgent can erode public trust ‍and spark polemics on social media.

“The use of patwal should be given to officials who have high urgency in‍ their state⁤ duties,” he explained. “Giving patwals to officials whose‌ duties are not urgent can ⁤actually affect public trust‍ in society.”

Beyond the public⁤ outcry, the policy’s resource allocation has⁣ also come ⁣under scrutiny. Prof. Ulung highlighted that the provision of⁣ patrols involves significant resources, including police personnel. This ​raises questions about the optimal use ‍of ‍state facilities and whether ‌such measures are justified for non-urgent⁢ tasks.

The incident has ‌prompted the Traffic police to impose sanctions on the patrol officers involved, signaling a ‌potential shift in how such escorts ‍are managed.⁣ Meanwhile, the debate⁣ continues to⁤ ripple through Jakarta’s social and political spheres, with citizens demanding transparency and accountability.

Key Points Summary

| Aspect | Details | ‌
|————|————-| ‌
| Incident | Viral video of RI 36 ⁢car escorted by patrol officer on Jalan jenderal Sudirman⁢ |
|⁣ Expert opinion ⁣ | Prof. Ulung‌ Pribadi calls for policy review to ​ensure efficiency and minimize misuse ‌|
| Public Impact | erosion of trust and social⁢ media polemics |
| Resource ⁤Allocation ⁣ | Significant police personnel and state resources involved |
| Policy Focus | Patrols ‍should prioritize officials ⁤with urgent‍ state⁤ duties | ⁤

As Jakarta navigates this controversy, the call‍ for‌ a policy review grows louder. the⁣ incident serves ​as a reminder of the⁤ delicate balance between state ⁣privileges and public trust, ‍urging officials to reconsider the allocation of resources and the necessity of such measures.

What’s your take on the patwal system? ‍Should it be reserved for onyl the most ‌urgent state duties? Join the conversation and share​ your insights.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.