4 Feb. Post facebook, topic “Objection to Amendment Section 112” with details as follows
This will be the first time in history that Section 112 amendments will be made by members of the House of Representatives. With the reason that in order to reduce the problem of using Article 112 of the law as a tool for political bullying
The insults of the institute Coordinated like an orchestra Walk the game both in the council On the road and people outside the country
Confirm that one more time, do not take the offense to Section 112 to compare with the ordinary criminal law. Because this section is intended to protect the King and the Heir-apparent And have this kind of law since R.E. 127 (2453) after the government change The Constitution of the People’s Party of 1932 has provided protection.
The monarchy is the cornerstone of stability. Is the center of the mind and nation Only those who wish to overthrow the Institute tried to rock this pillar. With undermining
Section 112 does not hurt anyone. If you do not intend to harass the institution The king is not a villager Not a politician Not someone who has to be criticized. Criticism, without mentioning him is not guilty. But someone wants to criticize the institute
Don’t think that people oppose or oppose institutional harassment. To reclaim or restore the system of integrity Don’t try to conjure Don’t be afraid of your shadow, don’t be crazy.
The effort to amend Article 112 is an attempt to allow public criticism of the Head of State. Without allowing any criminal law And pushed it into an offense under defamation law, which is a civil offense Low criminal penalties, imprisonment for up to 1 year, and if resolving successfully, those who are in charge of 112 cases will also receive compensation. You will not have to go to jail due to the new laws that apply to you and the convict.
Anyone can know about this matter.
But it is still worrying that the MPs exercise their privilege in discussing the institutions in the council. With the monarch being drawn to a political game
Agreed with Dr. Warong in hunting the names. To object to the amendment to Section 112.
– .
