Heonjae announced on the 4th that it has made a decision to cite some of the request for temporary injunction with regard to the ’10th bar exam notice’ on the 29th of last month by bar exam candidates.
Constitutional Constitution, in the opinion of all judges, of the announcement made by the Minister of Justice in relation to the 10th bar exam △Limited the period for preliminary application for the test for self-invested persons to 6 p.m. on January 3 △ Prohibited the test of corona 19 confirmed patients One part △ The decision to suspend the effect of limiting the application of high-risk applicants to medical institutions by transferring them to a medical institution until the final decision of the case for the Constitutional Petition is declared.
Earlier, on November 23 of last year, the Ministry of Justice announced that corona19 confirmed persons cannot take the bar exam, which is held from January 5 to 9, 2020. In the case of self-quarantine, the Ministry of Justice applies for the self-isolation test in advance by 6 p.m. on January 3, and includes prior approval from the local public health center so that some candidates can take the test. On the 29th of last month, claiming that the law violates the freedom of choice of profession, the right to health, the right to life, and the right to equality, he filed a request for a constitutional petition to the Constitutional Court on the 29th of last month and filed a provisional injunction for suspension of effect. Although it is possible to take the test in this isolated and isolated place, if the opportunity to take the test is lost, there is a fear that it may be an excessive limitation on the freedom of choice of profession.” He explained the reason for the citation decision. “Rather, a prospective test taker with suspicious symptoms. He said, “There is a risk of spreading infectious diseases as they are forced to take the test without hiding their symptoms, so applicants are at risk of suffering serious damage that is difficult to recover, such as giving up on the test or taking the risk of infection.”
In addition, “if the request is dismissed in the final decision of the main case after quoting the provisional disposition, the Ministry of Justice has a separate infection control facility installed urgently in order to provide opportunities and conditions for corona19 confirmed or high-risk persons to take the test at their own choice. It only bears the burden of having to set up a test site.” “The penalty incurred when the claim is cited after dismissing the provisional disposition is more than the penalty incurred when the claim is dismissed in the final decision after quoting the temporary disposition. It’s big,” he explained.
Seo Han-gil, Dong-A.com reporter [email protected]
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
—
–
