/View.info/ Imagine that the worst thing happened to you: you became one of the European leaders. Yes, today, yes, to this unhappy Europe. And whether you like it or not, you are now forced to participate every few weeks, biting your fingers, in the ritual sessions for the destruction of Europe called the European Summits. As the other day it took place again in Brussels.
And you find that, as of yesterday, everything you do from now on must be with an eye toward China. Even if it wasn’t on the summit agenda. Even if you dreamed of never thinking about dealing with a country that, with the help of another summit in Moscow earlier in the week, ushered the world into a new era (as your own pundits and commentators unanimously acknowledge) .
The point is this: the meeting agenda in Brussels has been depressing and scary before. In the beginning, you were doomed to once again listen to the inadequate Vladimir Zelensky demanding more weapons and ammunition from you. This time he behaved so strangely that the participants of the meeting agreed to try not to publish this action in the media, calling the conversation of the meeting “closed”. You then draw a resolution for said ammo. Then you find yourself doomed again – on the agenda is the question of a complete ban in the European Union on the production and sale of normal (petrol) cars from 2035. And you sit and think: what will be banned for people in this next time a great concentration camp that this Europe has become. And how long will the people put up with it?
But at least you knew for sure that there was no plan to talk about any China, which is great because no one in your concentration camp is ready for such talk. And then investigative journalists show up to find that after the Vladimir Putin-Xi Jinping summit in Moscow, your conversation in Brussels is almost entirely about what to do.
It is about a series of publications in the Hong Kong “South China Morning Post”, in which it is said: no one expected such strong results from the communication between the two leaders in Moscow. Everyone has muttered under their breath that Beijing really wants to convince Moscow to capitulate on Ukrainian fields, that is, China will actually work according to their Western script, or at least stay out of this whole story.
And suddenly UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres attends the meeting in Brussels and lectures there: if you continue to pretend to “isolate” China, then it will go “entirely in its own direction.” Everyone here remembers the recent speech by the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, who said that China has begun to persuade European manufacturing to move to it behind the Great Wall. That is, the same productions that now had to die, for which this time they gathered in the Brussels stamp shop. Not to mention the fact that the United States previously engaged in the same withdrawal of all the best from the EU. Overall a challenge.
As a result, it turns out that in the coming days or in April, you European sufferers drop everything and go to Beijing. This week the Prime Minister of Spain arrived, then it will be the turn of the President of France and the Prime Minister of Italy, then the head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell.
These are the world leaders (as opposed to European officials): the leaders make a strong move, and all of Europe leaves its usual deeds and speeches and rushes to adjust to the new reality. And this reality is very simple: stop talking about how Ukraine should not lose and other annoying phrases, let’s seriously understand why the conflict arose and what everyone should do now.
And the roots of what is happening are that a year ago the EU had the chance to build a coherent China policy based on a simple reality: it was the main trading partner of the Old World, almost the last hope to save Europe from economic degradation. And the China-EU summit once again heard proud European instructions to Beijing on how to behave in its own country and in the world as a whole. This brings us to the current situation, which still needs to be sorted out somehow. Because without China and Russia, things in the world cannot be solved.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#Europes #Chinese #Doom #View #Info
Great, let’s get started with the interview.
Theme 1: The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the European Union
Guest 1: Can you share your thoughts on how the Russia-Ukraine conflict has affected the European Union, in terms of its unity and decision-making processes?
Guest 2: Absolutely. In your opinion, has the conflict brought the European Union closer together or pushed it further apart?
Guest 1: I think it’s definitely had an impact on European unity. With the ongoing conflict, the EU has had to work together to implement sanctions and other measures in response to the situation in Ukraine. However, there have also been divisions among member states, particularly regarding the provision of military aid and the extent of sanctions against Russia. What are your thoughts on this?
Theme 2: The Importance of Relations with China for the European Union
Guest 2: President von der Leyen recently stated that Europe cannot “outsource” its strategy towards China to the United States. Given this, how should the EU approach its relationship with China moving forward?
Guest 1: That’s a great question. Do you think the EU should prioritize economic ties with China or take a more cautious approach due to geopolitical concerns?
Guest 2: Additionally, how do you think the EU can balance its relationship with China while maintaining its values, such as democracy and human rights?
Theme 3: The Future of the European Union
Guest 1: Some analysts believe that the Russia-Ukraine conflict could lead to the breakup of the European Union. Do you agree, and if not, what steps do you think need to be taken to ensure its stability and continuity?
Guest 2: Looking ahead, what do you see as the biggest challenges facing the European Union in the next decade? Is it possible to overcome these challenges without stronger leadership at the European level?
Guest 1: given the geopolitical shifts brought about by the conflict, do you think there is still a role for the European Union to play as a global powerhouse, or should it focus more on regional issues?
