Nicosia. The governments of the European Union cannot choose whether or not to execute the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) against the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant, Josep Borrell stated yesterday, high representative of the European Union (EU) for foreign affairs and security policy, at a time when a group of German officials suggested that their country would not abide by the ICC ruling because to the Nazi history of Germany
.
States that signed the Rome Convention are obliged to implement the court’s decision. It is not optional
Borrell said during a visit to Cyprus for a workshop for Israeli and Palestinian peace activists.
US Senator Lindsey Graham threatened Canada, Great Britain, Germany and France with sanctions if they try to help the ICC
and stressed that the United States will have to devastate the economy
of those countries that comply with the order of the international court.
In Germany, officials hinted that the country would not arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Berlin’s relationship with Tel Aviv and anti-Semitism, according to the newspaper The Jerusalem Post.
I find it difficult to imagine that arrests could be carried out in Germany on this basis
said Steffen Hebestreit, spokesman for German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
Hebestreit did not respond to whether Netanyahu might visit Germany, but said his government is analyzing legal issues about how to comply with the court order.
We will carefully study the internal steps. Any further action will be taken only when a visit by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant is foreseeable.
he indicated, according to the Israeli media.
US President-elect Donald Trump reacted with surprise when Israeli President Isaac Herzog assured him earlier this month that Israeli intelligence assesses that half of the prisoners are still alive and that their release is an urgent matter
according to three people familiar with the matter, reported the news outlet Axios.
Meanwhile, two other people informed about the conversation confirmed that Trump thinks that most of the hostages are dead, according to the American media, detailing that the dialogue took place during a call to congratulate the Republican magnate on his victory in the elections. presidential.
The media added that when President Joe Biden received the billionaire in a two-hour meeting in the presidential office, the issue of the hostages still in Gaza was addressed and he proposed that they work together to reach an agreement.
I don’t care if Trump gets all the credit as long as they come home
The president said to the families of the American captives in a meeting, shortly after his conversation with the president-elect, two sources mentioned.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#warns #Criminal #Courts #order #apprehend #Netanyahu #optional
–
Here are two PAA (Personal Assistant)** questions related to the provided interview title and content:
## Interview: Warrants Issued, Tensions Rise: Navigating the ICC Order on Netanyahu
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we delve into the churning waters of international law and politics as the International Criminal Court (ICC) issues arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. This decision has sparked controversy and raised complex questions about national sovereignty, international justice, and the role of the ICC. We are joined by two distinguished guests to unpack this multifaceted issue.
**Guest 1: Dr. [Guest 1 Name],** a leading international law expert specializing in international tribunals and human rights
**Guest 2: Dr. [Guest 2 Name],** a political analyst focusing on Middle Eastern affairs and US foreign policy
**Section 1: The ICC’s Decision and its Implications**
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 1 Name], the ICC’s decision to issue arrest warrants against Prime Minister Netanyahu and Mr. Gallant has ignited fierce debate. Can you shed light on the specific charges brought against these individuals and the legal basis for the ICC’s jurisdiction in this case?
* **Interviewer:** This case has been met with resistance from some countries, notably Germany, which cites historical reasons and concerns about its relationship with Israel. Dr. [Guest 2 Name], from a political perspective, how do you see this resistance playing out? What are the potential ramifications for international cooperation with the ICC?
**Section 2: National Sovereignty vs. International Justice**
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 1 Name], the EU’s high representative, Josep Borrell, has stated that countries are obligated to implement the ICC’s decisions. Can you elaborate on the legal framework surrounding this obligation, and what mechanisms exist to ensure compliance?
* **Interviewer:** This case raises the age-old question of balancing national sovereignty with international justice. Dr. [Guest 2 Name], how can the international community navigate this delicate balance, particularly when dealing with powerful nations like Israel and the United States?
**Section 3: The US Response and its Global Impact**
* **Interviewer:** Senator Lindsey Graham’s threats of sanctions against countries cooperating with the ICC represent a strong stance against the court’s authority. Dr. [Guest 1 Name], does this response signify a broader challenge to the ICC’s legitimacy, and how might it influence future cases?
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 2 Name], this situation highlights a potential rift between the US and its allies over the ICC’s role. What are the implications of this division for international diplomacy and global security?
**Section 4: Looking Forward – The Path Ahead**
* **Interviewer:** This case is far from resolved. What potential scenarios do you foresee? Dr. [Guest 1 Name], what legal avenues are available to Prime Minister Netanyahu and Mr. Gallant, and what are the likely consequences if they choose to defy the ICC’s order?
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 2 Name], how do you think this situation will shape the discourse on international law and accountability for leaders accused of war crimes? What lessons can be learned from this complex and highly politicized case?
**Conclusion:**
Thank you to our distinguished guests for providing such insightful analysis. This case highlights the complexity of international relations and the ongoing struggle to balance national interests with the pursuit of justice. As this story continues to unfold, World Today News will continue to bring you the latest developments and expert commentary.
