Referee Ivan Sidenkov made a mistake by displaying a purple card to the defender “Locomotive” Marco Mamassi in the match of the sixth spherical of the championship of Russia with “Khimki”this conclusion was formulated by the expert-judicial fee of the President of the RFU.
The meeting took put on Saturday in Khimki and ended with the score 3: in favor of the company. Mamassi was sent off in the 40th minute for a foul towards Khimki midfielder Reziuan Mirzov right after the referee applied the VAR method.
– The decision of the CES is motivated by the actuality that Mamassi, possessing occur into get hold of with the experience of Mirzov, in the opinion of all the associates of the commission, deserved a warning for reckless behavior. In tactical terms, most of the committee members do not think about the violation of the principles by the player of the Lokomotiv team to deprive the opponent of a crystal clear chance to rating a aim, as the opponent did not have control of the ball. The defender, before committing a violation of the principles, managed to choose a situation between the attacker and the ball, and consequently the attacker’s speed was diminished.
This has potentially supplied a great chance for defender Stanislav Magkeev, who is nearly on the same line as the striker in the axial component of the pitch, to enter into one fight with him. Supplied these conditions, the fee thinks that it was Mamassi who experienced the chance to control the ball in the class of the activity episode, if not for violation of the regulations by him. This is a vital criterion not conducive to interpreting this violation of the rules as depriving the opponent of a crystal clear opportunity to score a purpose.
The fee also uncovered that referee Sergei Karasev did not erroneously award an 11-meter kick to CSKA at the stop of the match with Akhmat (4: 2).
– The ESC determination was determined by the fact that, according to the bulk of the committee associates, a subtle ball call with the hand of a player of the CSKA defending group Igor Diveev in his individual penalty region, trying to block the ball escape, was punishable, as his hand absent from the opponent was pulled absent from the physique and enlarged him, the report reported.
In accordance to the fee, referee Vladislav Bezborodov should really have sent off Rostov midfielder Daniil Utkin in the 71st minute of the match versus Sochi, because “the steps of this player in a duel with the Sochi Angban participant, in accordance to most customers of the fee, threatened the wellness of the opponent “.
“The tackle for his portion was carried out at a rather high speed and the opponent’s leg was inserted involving his legs, which resulted in a motion to twist and break the leg, which resulted in a major personal injury received by the participant of Sochi, “the text states.
Angban was diagnosed with a torn knee cruciate ligament.
Furthermore, the commission dominated that referee Aleksey Sukhoi did not the right way award a penalty to Torpedo’s purpose in the 52nd minute of the match with Zenit.
Examine also:
–
