Thiruvananthapuram: EP Jayarajan v P. Judging Jayarajan’s bomb charge is a sign of new slum formation in CPM. Some see PJ’s indictment as the beginning of the loss of the consensus formula that Kodiyeri had formulated among Kannur leaders. Since the party’s secretary of state has asked the commission itself to press charges, P. Outside the CPM, there is curiosity as to whether Jayarajan will go ahead.
Even earlier there were some differences of opinion among Kannur’s leaders, but not a shadow remained during Kodiyeri’s tenure as secretary. If there were disputes both at the front and in the party, Kodiyeri handled them with diplomatic excellence. But the P against the EP means the formula is lost. Jayarajan’s accusation. EP’s problem starts when MV Govindan who is younger than him was appointed secretary of state and then brought to PB. EP tried to convince the party of his displeasure by not coming to Thiruvananthapuram even as a convener of the LDF. But neither the secretary of state nor the prime minister went to persuade. Meanwhile P. who cut off the party against EP. Jayarajan’s accusation.
The secretary of state himself told P. There are also those who see Jayarajan’s accusation as a message from MV Govindan to be taken seriously. MV Govindan’s support not to add nuclear water to P party ideology. There are those who believe that there is Jayarajan. Another Fr. Jayarajan targets EP Jayarajan only. Some top executives say otherwise. Pinarayi will say the party will accept the group of people who want change. Jayarajan’s accusation is supported. P. If Jayarajan files a complaint, if the secretary of state himself makes a request that a commission be appointed to investigate, it cannot be rejected without approval. Top party leaders are now waiting to see if PJ will press charges.
