Headline: Former Employee Accuses Randridge International of Wage Abuse
Former Randridge International Employee Claims Unpaid Wages Amid Restructuring
In a troubling development for Randridge International Ltd, former employee Francis Declan Radmall has accused the engineering firm of engaging in “financial games” while failing to pay him and other staff members the wages they are owed. Radmall’s claims, brought before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), underscore the challenges many face in securing their redundancy entitlements and unpaid salaries amidst corporate restructuring.
Radmall, who resides in Johannesburg, South Africa, was among two former employees to file complaints against Randridge after being made redundant in July. He claims he is owed a staggering €25,995.60, encompassing redundancy payments and multiple unpaid wages from his tenure at the company. As he expressed during the hearing, “All I want is a piece of money that is due to me so I can feed my family, pay for my house, and pay for the petrol that I put in my car."
The Company’s Financial Struggles
Randridge International has cited significant financial difficulties. In a letter dated July 10, the company informed Radmall of its “challenging times,” attributing its inability to pay wages on the “knock-on effects” of a prior bankruptcy. However, despite being given notice of his redundancy on July 5, Radmall asserts he still has not received the financial support legally owed to him.
CEO Darren Daly addressed the situation, having previously communicated an email regarding the layoffs on July 4, before the letter’s date. During the proceedings, Radmall alleged that he was to receive a pay raise from €52,000 to €56,000, which would constitute an additional €333.33 monthly. However, he claims the payment was never received, as he alleged he had not signed a new contract, a point contested by Daly, who stated that Radmall’s entitlement to the raise was contingent upon signing.
Conflicting Claims and Missed Payments
Radmall also highlighted discrepancies in his salary payments. He argues he has missed out on €2,833 for his June paycheck and €5,495.65 for July, claiming that he had not received payslips to validate these payments. The company maintains that it paid 40% of his salary for June, a claim Radmall disputes, insisting he has no evidence to support any payments made.
In a counter-argument from the company’s representative, Roberta Urbon from Peninsula, it was asserted that “the majority” of Radmall’s claimed amounts had been settled. The presiding adjudicating officer, Breiffni O’Neill, requested further documentation to support Mr. Radmall’s claims, stating, “I don’t want headline figures, I want to see a breakdown.” This call for clarity underlines the complexity of the case, with Radmall expressing concerns that Randridge were attempting to evade payment obligations.
Broader Implications
Radmall emphasized that his experience is indicative of a larger trend, noting an extensive list of “over 20 people” he claims are similarly owed compensation by Randridge. He characterized the company’s actions as an attempt to "get away with not paying people in accordance with their contract."
In a parallel WRC hearing on the same day, another former employee, Alison Tynan, stated that while she had finally received a payment for statutory redundancy, she was still contesting outstanding amounts including notice pay and unpaid wages. Tynan described her frustrating experience, where despite receiving payslips indicating owed amounts, the actual payments did not materialize.
Next Steps for Randridge International
As this situation develops, O’Neill announced that the tribunal would not reconvene before the New Year. Radmall found this delay “unacceptable,” reinforcing his view of Randridge’s attempts to prolong the payment process. The ramifications of this case, both in terms of financial accountability for the company and its impact on employee morale, potentially extend beyond individual claims.
With the stakes high for those who are reliant on these payments, the outcome of these hearings will be closely watched. The depictions of hardship serve as a timely reminder of the importance of corporate responsibility, particularly during times of corporate distress.
As this situation unfolds and further hearings are scheduled, affected employees and observers alike await the tribunal’s written decision. The handling of these cases could serve as a crucial test of employment rights under Irish law, and many are hopeful for a resolution that reflects both justice and accountability.
For regular updates on this story and other employment-related issues, subscribe to our Business Today newsletter or follow us on social media.
Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments below or reach out to us via our contact page for more information on your rights as an employee.
