Home » today » Health » Embryo-Fetus vs Baby: Why Language Matters in Reproductive Health

Embryo-Fetus vs Baby: Why Language Matters in Reproductive Health

No. An embryo-fetus is not a baby

The news says: “She suffers a miscarriage and loses the nine-week-old baby she was expecting.”

NO.

At 9 weeks a fetus is lost.

A fetus is not a baby.

A baby is a newborn, a small child at the breast.

Transforming embryos (up to 8 weeks) and fetuses (from 8 weeks to delivery) into babies implies a philosophy that puts the embryo-fetus above the mother.

Language is not neutral, even if it is “innocent”.

For example, someone identifying as “father” or “mother” of a cat or a dog is not neutral.

Transforming the embryo-fetus into a baby in the news is not neutral either, it is manipulation.

An embryo-fetus is not a “person”

An embryo-fetus is not a baby.

An embryo-fetus is not a person.

A baby is a person.

Civil Code, Spain: you are a person from birth:

“Personality is acquired at the moment of birth alive, once the entire detachment from the maternal womb has occurred.”

Saying “baby” for “embryo-fetus” is common, but without scientific sense. With the problem of the ideology that promotes that of the “unborn” to turn it into a person.

Another thing, yes, is perinatal mourning.

perinatal death

The question does not refer to perinatal mourning, which is unquestionable.

Perinatal grief is often denied and unauthorized grief, but the miscarriage of a wanted pregnancy can be very traumatic.

The fact that the mother feels that she has lost a baby is a legitimate and possible feeling. It is a feeling, a tear.

“Perinatal grief: a secret within a mystery”: “Although for the WHO the perinatal period extends from 22 weeks of gestation (154 days) to one week of independent life, in practice and in the literature on the subject, this period is extended. Kowalski extends it from conception to the end of the first year of life, which converts ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous or induced abortion, selective reduction, the death of a gestational twin, intrauterine or intrapartum fetus death, premature death, neonatal death, and also babies born with congenital anomalies or children given up for adoption into perinatal losses. The concept of perinatal loss goes beyond the framework of the perinatal period of the WHO and even loss due to death”.

https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0211-57352011000100005

Embryo-fetus, not baby

The question is to transform the embryo-fetus into a baby.

The question is about the “nonnato” (the “unborn child” of the United States), the “child”, “baby” lost.

If the health of the embryo-fetus is more important than that of the pregnant woman, maternal mortality increases.

The health of the mother is not as important as that of the baby growing inside her.

The health of the mother is MORE important than that of the embryo/fetus.

Among other things, the health of the mother depends on the health of her entire family, including previous children.

When the embryo-fetus is admitted as a baby, or “unborn”, the mother is being converted into the womb, into a simple carrier and “slave” of her fruit.

The case of the whooping cough vaccine, the pregnant woman “sacrificed” on the altar of the profits of the pharmaceutical industries

By transforming the embryo-fetus into a baby, we are accepting an ideology that despises the pregnant woman, an ideology that kills.

For example, the whooping cough vaccine is a necessary but very flawed vaccine.

Instead of improving it, the pregnant woman is vaccinated to protect the baby in its first months.

That is to say, the woman becomes the womb that protects “the fruit of her womb” BECAUSE the Governments of the entire world tolerate that the whooping cough vaccine is not improved (and we have known for decades its need for improvement).

What’s worse, in Spain there is no whooping cough vaccine as such, it goes together with the tetanus and diphtheria vaccine, so the pregnant woman transformed into a womb is unnecessarily and excessively vaccinated because the pharmaceutical industry has governments in its hands, and language transforms the embryo-fetus into a baby.

If a woman has two consecutive pregnancies, in two years she can receive the triple vaccine (tetanus-diphtheria-whooping cough) twice, only because of the capture of the governments by the pharmaceutical industries.

Language, from embryo-fetus to baby, helps to “demand” this sacrifice from the pregnant woman.

The pregnant woman would not have to be vaccinated if the whooping cough vaccine had been improved.

Pregnant women should not be vaccinated with the triple vaccine if there was an isolated presentation of the whooping cough vaccine

https://www.espaciosanitario.com/opinion/el-mirador/tosferina-brotes-epidemicos-sin-antivacunas-y-la-mujer-como-vientre_1151650_102.html

The baby demands a “perfect” pregnant woman. Canada, drugs in the hair

The “baby” deserves, of course, a perfect pregnant-mother.

You have to remove the creature if it is not perfect!

The example in Canada of this “thought-baby”, of putting the mother after the embryo-foetus, is taking the newborn baby away from the mother who uses illegal drugs during pregnancy.

The ideological drift of “feeling” carrying a “baby” has led to the determination of the presence of illegal drugs in the hair of the scalp. In Ontario (Canada), between 2005 and 2015, such a test was performed on 16,000 women. Their results were used to justify the loss of custody of the babies.

Unfortunately, the analysis was later shown to give inconsistent results and was disproportionately applied to indigenous, racialized, poor, and generally marginalized women.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095539591830269X

The baby had to be “defended” from its mother, but such defense was a permanent ideology against the “imperfect” woman.

To jail (or to the gallows) the “imperfect” pregnant woman. USA

If the embryo-fetus is a baby, a person, in case of “not taking good care of the baby”, the pregnant woman can be tried, imprisoned and, in her case, sentenced to death.

In Wisconsin (United States), the embryo-fetus has been transformed into an “unborn baby”, and the mother can be persecuted and imprisoned “if she mistreats him”; that is, if she, for example, consumes illegal drugs, or alcohol. And such legislation is applied, as in Canada, especially harshly to marginalized pregnant women, such as black and poor.

https://thecrimereport.org/2022/12/01/policing-pregnancy-wisconsins-fetal-protection-law-forces-women-into-treatment-or-jail/

In South Carolina (United States), the embryo-fetus turned into a “baby”, into an “unborn”, into a “person”, can lead to consider voluntary abortion as murder, and the pregnant woman to be sentenced to death.

https://www.propublica.org/article/legal-medical-impact-abortion-legislation-qa

In summary

When the embryo-fetus is admitted as a baby, or “unborn”, the mother is being converted into the womb, into a simple carrier and “slave” of her fruit.

By transforming the embryo-fetus into a baby, we are accepting an ideology that despises the pregnant woman, an ideology that kills.

This has nothing to do with voluntary abortion.

It has nothing to do with perinatal mourning and its accompaniment either.

It has to do with women’s health.

Confusing an embryo-fetus with a “baby” is an aberration that puts the embryo-fetus above the woman.

2023-07-23 08:00:00
#embryo #embryo #fetus #fetus #baby #baby #embryofetus #baby #language #turns #pregnant #woman #womb #JuanGrvas

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.