vivian Jenna Wilson Suggests Elon Musk Used Sex selection in IVF Conceptions

Vivian Jenna Wilson,the 20-year-old estranged transgender daughter of Elon Musk,has sparked controversy by suggesting her father may have used elective sex selection during in vitro fertilization (IVF).Wilson’s recent online activity has drawn attention to Musk’s family planning and the ethical considerations surrounding sex selection in assisted reproductive technologies. The implications of these claims raise questions about reproductive autonomy and societal values. Wilson’s allegations stem from a post on Threads, where she alluded to her gender being predetermined and possibly manipulated during conception.

The suggestion stems from a post wilson made on Threads, the Instagram microblogging request. In her post, she alluded to the idea that her gender was predetermined and possibly manipulated during her conception.

Wilson, a child from Musk’s first marriage to Justine Wilson, came out as transgender at the age of 16. This period coincided with her living full-time with her mother during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between Wilson and her father has been strained, notably after her transition.

wilson’s Allegations on Social Media

in a thought-provoking statement posted on Threads, Vivian jenna Wilson shared her outlook on her birth and subsequent gender identity. Her words have sparked considerable discussion online, prompting many to consider the ethical implications of sex selection in IVF.

According to wilson, “My assigned sex at birth was a commodity that was bought and paid for. So when I was feminine as a child and then turned out to be transgender I was going against the product that was sold.” This statement suggests a belief that her birth sex was intentionally chosen, and her transgender identity represents a deviation from that preselected outcome.

musk’s Past Comments and family Dynamics

Elon Musk has publicly expressed views that have been perceived as unsupportive of his daughter’s gender identity. In a 2024 livestreamed interview with Jordan peterson, Musk claimed he was “tricked” into supporting gender-affirming care for her. He also deadnamed her, stating, “I lost my son,” and attributed her transition to the “woke mind virus” – a term frequently used by the far-right to criticize progressive social attitudes.

Musk’s Large Family: A Closer Look

As of March 11, 2025, Elon Musk is known to have 14 children. This number has been subject to change, with reports suggesting he may have had at least two more children this year alone. His approach to family planning has often been unconventional, utilizing IVF and surrogacy to expand his family.

From his first marriage to Justine Wilson,Musk has five children: Nevada,Vivian,Griffin,Kai,Saxon,and Damian. Tragically, Nevada, their firstborn son, died at 10 weeks old due to Sudden infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Justine Wilson recounted in an essay for Marie Claire that she visited an IVF clinic “less than two months” after Nevada’s death. She later gave birth to twin boys (including Vivian, who later transitioned) and triplet sons.

musk also has three children with Grimes: two sons and one daughter. Their first son, X Æ A-Xii (known as X), was conceived via IVF and is often seen in public with Musk. They later had two more children via surrogate: a daughter named Exa Dark Sideræl, followed by a son named Techno mechanicus.

Additionally, Musk fathered four children via IVF with Shivon Zilis, a director at his company Neuralink. Zilis gave birth to twins, a boy named Strider and a girl named Azure, followed by a daughter named Arcadia and a son named Seldon Lycurgus.

Considering these figures, at least 10 of Musk’s children were born as boys. With Vivian transitioning in her teenage years and subsequently distancing herself from her father, the situation highlights complex family dynamics and differing viewpoints on gender identity.

The Science and Ethics of Sex Selection

Studies suggest that IVF may slightly increase the likelihood of having a boy, with a range of 53% to 56% compared to the natural conception rate of approximately 51%. Though, the possibility of elective sex selection raises significant ethical and legal questions.

Sex selection for non-medical reasons is illegal in many parts of the world, including the UK, Canada, and South Africa. Exceptions are made in rare cases where parents risk passing on a genetic disorder that primarily affects one sex, such as hemophilia or Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy.

In the United States, sex selection is currently legal, leading to a fertility tourism industry for couples seeking to choose their baby’s sex for non-medical reasons.

Methods of Sex Selection in IVF

Sex selection in IVF typically involves preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). This process screens embryos for sex chromosomes (XX for girls, XY for boys) before implantation in the uterus, boasting an almost 100% accuracy rate.

Another,less common method is the Ericsson method,which sorts sperm before artificial insemination. This technique relies on the principle that faster-swimming sperm tend to produce boys, while slower sperm produce girls. Though, the Ericsson method has a lower success rate, ranging from 70% to 75% for the desired sex.

Ethical Considerations and Societal Impact

The practice of choosing a child’s gender raises profound ethical concerns. Critics argue that it could lead to unbalanced population demographics, particularly in cultures where sons are favored over daughters due to patriarchal beliefs.There are also concerns that sex selection could negatively impact a child’s welfare if they are born the “wrong” gender in the eyes of their parents.

Conversely, proponents of sex selection argue that it allows for “family balancing,” enabling couples to choose to have daughters when they already have sons, or vice versa. It can also help families rebuild after the loss of a child of a particular sex.

Musk’s Stance on IVF and Pro-Natalist Views

While Elon Musk has not publicly stated his specific views on sex selection in IVF, a source close to him shared insights in a New York Times profile last year. According to the source, “Mr.Musk has said that I.V.F. is a more efficient way of having children as it allows parents to control parts of the process.”

Musk has been vocal about his pro-natalist stance, advocating for people to have as many children as

Elon musk, IVF, and Sex Selection: Unpacking the Ethical Quagmire

Is the ability too choose a child’s sex ethically justifiable, even within the context of assisted reproductive technologies like IVF? The recent allegations surrounding Elon Musk and his daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, bring this complex issue to the forefront.

Interviewer: Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading bioethicist specializing in reproductive technologies, welcome to World Today News. Vivian Jenna Wilson’s statements regarding potential sex selection in her conception via IVF have sparked a meaningful public debate. Can you shed light on the ethical dimensions of this controversial practice?

Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. The ethical implications of sex selection in IVF are multifaceted and deeply complex, raising questions about reproductive autonomy, gender equality, and societal values.At the heart of the matter lies the question of whether parents have the right to choose their child’s sex for non-medical reasons. Wilson’s allegations highlight the potential for misuse of reproductive technologies and the lasting impact on children born under such circumstances. The act of selecting a child’s sex for non-medical reasons, including the preference for one sex over another, raises ethical concern.

Interviewer: many people are unfamiliar with the scientific process. How is sex selection actually achieved during IVF?

Dr. Sharma: Sex selection in IVF typically utilizes preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). This advanced technology allows for the screening of embryos before implantation, enabling a choice based on sex chromosomes: XX for females and XY for males. PGT boasts a very high accuracy rate, approaching 100%. Less commonly, the Ericsson method, which separates sperm based on motility, is used.However, it has a lower success rate, around 70-75%, for selecting between male or female offspring. Both methods raise questions about the propriety of utilizing these techniques to manipulate and select the sex of a child. there is also the issue of sex selection using IVF being illegal or heavily regulated in multiple countries across the world.

Interviewer: The legal landscape surrounding sex selection varies considerably across different countries. Can you elaborate on this?

Dr. Sharma: Absolutely. The legality of sex selection varies considerably globally.Many countries, including the UK, Canada, and South Africa, prohibit sex selection for non-medical reasons, typically allowing exceptions only in cases where severe sex-linked genetic disorders are a concern (e.g., hemophilia or Duchenne muscular dystrophy). In the United States, however, sex selection is often permitted, giving rise to a notable fertility tourism industry for couples seeking to circumvent national restrictions. This disparity highlights the significant ethical debates and diverse cultural interpretations surrounding sex selection in IVF.

Interviewer: Beyond the legality, are there major ethical arguments against sex selection in IVF?

Dr. Sharma: Yes, numerous ethical arguments exist. Critics highlight the potential for reinforcing gender stereotypes and imbalances in population demographics, particularly in societies exhibiting a strong preference for sons. Concerns are also raised regarding the possible psychological impact on children born due to intentional sex selection, especially if this preference has demonstrably influenced their parent’s parental decisions and familial relationship with them. The potential for commodification of children, where sex is chosen as if picking items on a menu and ignoring the personal identity of the child, also generates significant ethical concerns.

Interviewer: Are there any arguments in favor of sex selection in the context of IVF that are ethically defensible?

Dr.Sharma: Some proponents argue that sex selection in IVF can enable “family balancing,” helping couples achieve their desired family makeup. Those who’ve experienced the loss of a child of a particular sex might also consider it to help rebuild their family. Though, these arguments frequently enough grapple with the ethical concerns discussed earlier.

Interviewer: Elon Musk hasn’t explicitly commented on his views on sex selection. However, his known views on large families and his use of IVF could suggest a certain approach.How might his reported attitudes be viewed in light of this discussion?

Dr. Sharma: Elon Musk’s pro-natalist views and reported use of IVF – methods that enable significant control over the reproductive process – do raise questions despite a lack of public commentary on whether sex selection was used. This situation underlines the challenges in ensuring ethical parameters within the technological advancements in human reproduction.The use of reproductive technologies requires ethical consideration of long-term societal implications, a topic notably absent in mainstream discussions on reproduction techniques.

Interviewer: what are some of the key ethical takeaways to consider regarding sex selection through IVF?

Dr. Sharma: To summarize, several key ethical points must be considered:

The potential for gender imbalance: Sex selection can worsen societal biases against one sex and led to an uneven sex ratio.

Commodification of children: Choosing a child’s sex reduces their value to their inherent worth.

Psychological impacts: Children born after sex selection may face unique challenges regarding their identity and perception.

Legal frameworks: The varying legal situations globally highlight the ongoing debate over sex selection and the need for clear, worldwide regulations.

* Transparency and Informed Consent: Couples considering sex selection in IVF must be fully informed of the ethical, psychological, and social implications.

Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Sharma for your insightful commentary on this highly relevant subject.

Concluding Thought: The debate around sex selection in IVF is far from settled. let’s continue the dialog in the comments below and share your views on social media – how do you see the future of reproductive technologies shaping our understanding of ethics and societal values?