/ world today news/ How not to cry before Plevneliev‘s ingenious ideas
Even under the Constitution, I am almost obliged to respect my head of state.
Well, if we still imagine that we have a state, then it should also have a head.
This is something almost like in the family – we, the men, imagine something, and then it turns out that the “masters of the imagination” were not us, but the mistresses of the situation. For the more subtle – our lovely women (fuck them, between us).
From my father, with an enviable family experience, exceeding the years for the so-called platinum wedding, I have remembered two things. First, that there is no salvation from a woman and a landslide. And secondly, you can’t argue with a woman and a radio.
And since my father is also a sage, I follow his advice. Especially the second one – I’ve already stopped listening to the radio. As for the first one, if anyone can help me with an idea, I’d be eternally grateful…
So, after this sad introduction, I return to the essence of the topic.
Even if only out of respect for the territory, in which, after a memorable (I resist the temptation to say – and quite humiliating) tugging on the ear by his “boss” in front of the television cameras, she ended up in the post of head of state, who is still loan, it is bound to know at least a little of the history of that which it “rules.”
He had invited the Dalai Lama
to visit Bulgaria “for the first time”? No, my Head, state. In the fall of 1991, Sasho Karakachanov, then temporary mayor of Sofia, Moni Passi and our modesty, we welcomed him at the airport of Sofia airport.
Yes, it was a protocol “piniz” – the Dalai Lama had to be on an “unofficial visit” so as not to irritate Bulgaria in any way the People’s Republic of China. Otherwise, everything was “official” – both his meeting with President Zhelev and his lecture at Sofia University.
And the fact that this fact escaped our current head of state speaks of the level of his awareness. Or at least for the level of competence of his advisers. Nothing was known yet, again according to my head of state, about the idea “Bulgaria – the 16th republic of the USSR”? Not to me, my Head, state.
Already at the end of 1989, when she was probably still resting after her individual “wallpaper rally” of November 10, a newspaper – then called Narodna Kultura – published for the first time some of the documents devoted to this an idea. The newspaper even indicated where they were located, if someone wanted to get to know them in more detail (CDA, f. 1, op. 5, a.e. 583 and CDA, f. 1, op. 58, a.e . 86).
With democracy, those willing were found, and very soon their full presentation to the public is coming. Only because of my innate modesty, I will not mention who gave them 25 years ago to “People’s Culture” and who now prepared them in their complete version. And with my assumed respect for the head of state, I will not express my surprise that a quarter of a century later only she does not know about the fact that everything about the idea is already known…
Those days, the head of state officially informed us that only after Germany and the USSR agreed to divide Poland, they “caused” the Second World War.
Once again no, my Head of State. Before that, there was the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, in which the greedy Western victors placed Germany in a humiliating position, giving rise to a frantic thirst for revenge and revenge. (By the way, Nyoi with Bulgaria was his “spear under indigo”).
Then there was also a Munich agreement (September 30, 1938), by which England and France untied Hitler’s hands to seek this revenge and revenge not against them, but through “drang nach Osten”, i.e. against the Slavs.
The more perceptive will also explain why, in this situation, Stalin returned it to them with the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement of August 23, 1939.
And the more insensitive (or more ignorant) to say whatever comes to their mind. As long as they don’t distort history in the pose of being ignorant… That then
offend and
my country
The last inspired inspiration of my head of state is to create a “Bulgarian Twentieth Century” museum, in which we have put (I quote her words) “the truth about communism, the salvation of the Jews, fascism, national catastrophes and the transition”.
Well, how can you just not cry at the genius of such an idea? At least I found in her words as many as five motives for roaring.
First, the truths about which communism? This Stalinist, Asiatic-Bolshevik type forced upon us between 1944 and 1956? Or for that of Zhivkov’s personal regime after that? Or for the one in which our current head of state was also Komsomol secretary?
The truths are so different that they simply do not fit into just one. “3 in 1” does not work here, my Head of state.
Second, in the “truths” will we dare to say, for example, that unlike the Danes, who “sold” the lives of their Jews, we have saved them absolutely selflessly? And that we have no sin against the Jews of Greece and Macedonia simply because they were “German property” and we – only an “administration” under a foreign dictate in these areas in 1941-1944?
Third, the truth about which of our “fascism”? In Bulgaria, such a political system simply never existed. Yes, there were pro-fascist organizations, there was also a regime banning all parties. But shall we also tell the truth that it was then (1934-1939) that our country experienced its real economic “renewal”?
Fourth, will we put in the museum the “truth” that on the capital of a non-fascist and non-belligerent country, our current “big brother”, before whom our head of state keeps kneeling, dropped tons of bombs on its peaceful citizens? And will our head of state simultaneously demand the dismantling of not only the Monument to the Soviet Army, but also that of the “heroic American pilots” who senselessly killed our guiltless ancestors?
Or at least ask against their monument until the one of lieutenant Spisarevski is moved? Isn’t that exactly how “real truths” are born – by putting them opposite each other or next to each other?
And fifth, which I am most excited about. The last national catastrophe is actually the so-called our transition to democracy.
Well, I ask my head of state two simple things. One is – how exactly will he put him in the “museum of truths”? Only, please, not in the “parking lots” of Germany. Because truths have no “parking lots”, only memory.
The second – where exactly will the place of my head of state be in this last “truth”?
#state #View #Info
