A Love Tested by Prison Walls: Rafida Hamdi’s Unconventional Marriage Amid Egypt’s Human Rights Debate
In February 2020, Rafida Hamdi married her fiancé, Mohamed Adel, in a ceremony that defied convention. The couple exchanged vows without seeing each other—Adel was behind bars, serving an 11-year sentence as a prominent founder and spokesperson for Egypt’s April 6 opposition movement. “Rafida held her marriage in a way that she did not expect one day,” she recalls.
Adel’s imprisonment stems from charges including violating Egypt’s protest laws and spreading false news. However, his time in prison extends beyond the sentences handed down, with over five years spent in pretrial detention. Rafida’s attempts to complete the marriage procedures in person were repeatedly thwarted. “She says that she has repeatedly tried to complete the marriage procedures by attending together in prison, but this was not possible,” she explains.
This poignant story unfolds against a backdrop of mounting criticism of egypt’s human rights record. human rights organizations have accused the government of arbitrary pretrial detentions, deteriorating prison conditions, and forced disappearances. Egypt, however, denies thes allegations, pointing to initiatives like the presidential amnesty committee established in late 2023, which has reportedly led to the release of hundreds of political prisoners.
on January 28, Egypt’s human rights situation is set to be scrutinized during the United Nations’ Global Periodic Review (UPR). This process, conducted under the auspices of the UN Human Rights Council, evaluates the human rights records of all member states. Egypt’s participation comes amid ongoing international concern over its treatment of political dissidents and activists.
the case of Mohamed Adel highlights the broader challenges faced by opposition figures in Egypt. As a co-founder of the April 6 movement,Adel has been a vocal critic of the government,leading to his prolonged detention. His story is emblematic of the struggles many activists endure in the country.
Key Points at a Glance
Table of Contents
-
- Key Points at a Glance
- The first Arrest and Its Aftermath
- A Second Arrest and Prolonged Detention
- A Life in Limbo
- Hope for Freedom, Fear of New Trials
- Key Timeline of Adel’s Imprisonment
- A Call for Justice
- Egypt’s Human rights Record Under Scrutiny
- A Call for Justice
- Key Facts at a Glance
- Egypt’s Human Rights Progress: Cosmetic Steps or Genuine Reform?
- National Council for Human Rights: “We Have No authority,but Our Effort Is Clear”
- Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights Addresses Key Cases and Challenges
- Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights: Addressing Key Cases and Challenges
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Marriage | Rafida Hamdi married Mohamed Adel in February 2020 while he was imprisoned.|
| Charges Against Adel | Violating protest laws, spreading false news, and multiple other cases. |
| Detention Period | Over five years in pretrial detention, extending beyond formal sentences. |
| Government Response | Denies allegations, cites amnesty committee releasing hundreds of prisoners.|
| UN Review | Egypt’s human rights record under scrutiny in January 28 UPR session. |
As Egypt prepares for its UPR session, the world watches closely. Will the government address the concerns raised by human rights organizations, or will stories like Rafida and Mohamed’s continue to underscore the challenges faced by those who dare to dissent?
For more on egypt’s human rights situation, visit the UN Human Rights Office. To explore the findings of the UN Human Rights Committee, check out their latest report here.A Love Story Turned Nightmare: Rafidah and Adel’s Struggle for Freedom
Rafidah’s life with Adel began as a tale of love and shared dreams.the couple met 18 years ago through their involvement in the April 6 Movement, a youth-led initiative advocating for political reform in Egypt. “A love story started between us, and we decided to marry, form a family, and build our future,” Rafidah recalls. However, their aspirations were shattered when Adel’s activism led to his arrest, turning their lives into what she describes as “a great nightmare.”
The first Arrest and Its Aftermath
In December 2013, Adel was sentenced to three years in prison for violating Egypt’s demonstration law. After his release in 2017, he was required to spend 12 hours daily at a police station for three years—a condition that further strained their lives.
A Second Arrest and Prolonged Detention
In June 2018, Adel was arrested again, this time on charges of publishing false news. His crime? Criticizing Egypt’s decision to secure a loan from the International Monetary Fund through social media posts.He was held in pre-trial detention until september 2023, when he was sentenced to four years in prison. Notably, the court did not account for the time he had already spent in custody, effectively extending his imprisonment.
Rafidah laments, “This means Adel will be released in September 2027. If his pre-trial detention had been counted, he would have been freed on January 26, 2025.”
A Life in Limbo
Rafidah’s life has been marked by instability and uncertainty. “I do not feel any stability in my life at all,” she says. The couple’s hopes for a future together have been repeatedly dashed by Adel’s prolonged incarceration.
Hope for Freedom, Fear of New Trials
Despite the challenges, Rafidah clings to hope for Adel’s eventual release. However, she fears the possibility of new charges or trials, a common tactic used against activists in Egypt.
Key Timeline of Adel’s Imprisonment
| Event | Date | Details |
|————————————|——————-|—————————————————————————–|
| First Arrest | December 2013 | Sentenced to 3 years for violating demonstration law |
| Release with Restrictions | 2017 | Required to spend 12 hours daily at a police station for 3 years |
| Second Arrest | June 2018 | Charged with publishing false news for criticizing IMF loan |
| Sentencing | September 2023 | Sentenced to 4 years in prison, excluding pre-trial detention |
| Expected Release | September 2027 | Release date without counting pre-trial detention |
| Potential Release with Credit | January 26, 2025 | release date if pre-trial detention had been counted |
A Call for Justice
Rafidah’s story highlights the broader struggles faced by activists and their families in egypt. As she waits for Adel’s freedom,her resilience serves as a testament to the enduring power of love and hope in the face of adversity.
For more on the April 6 Movement and its impact on egyptian politics, visit BBC News.
Photo Credit: Rafidah’s Facebook accountEgyptian Prisoner adel Faces New Trials Amid Deteriorating Health and Calls for Presidential Pardon
In a case that has drawn international attention,Adel,an Egyptian prisoner of conscience,continues to face legal battles even as his health deteriorates in detention. Imprisoned since 2018, Adel was accused in two new cases during his incarceration, a practice often referred to as ”rotating charges.” This means that upon his scheduled release in September 2027, he will immediately face two new trials, prolonging his ordeal.
Adel’s wife, Rafidah, has been vocal about his plight. She revealed that his health has worsened multiple times during his imprisonment. In 2024, he went on a 50-day hunger strike to demand better treatment and improvements in his legal situation while detained in Gamasa Prison. Earlier this year, he was transferred to the Tenth of Ramadan Prison, where his conditions remain dire.
Rafidah has appealed directly to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi for a presidential pardon, emphasizing that Adel is a prisoner of opinion who “did not carry a weapon and did not kill.” She argues that he deserves amnesty to compensate for the years of his life lost behind bars.Her plea has been supported by the national Council for Human rights, which has also submitted a formal request for his release.
Egypt’s Human rights Record Under Scrutiny
Adel’s case comes amid broader concerns about Egypt’s human rights record. The United Nations conducts a comprehensive periodic review of human rights in member states every four years to assess their compliance with international human rights covenants. Egypt’s treatment of prisoners, especially those detained for political reasons, has been a recurring issue in these reviews.
The use of “rotating charges” to extend detentions has been widely criticized by human rights organizations. this tactic involves filing new charges against prisoners as their release dates approach, effectively keeping them incarcerated indefinitely. Adel’s case is a stark example of this practice, which has been condemned as a violation of due process and human rights.
A Call for Justice
Rafidah’s fight for her husband’s freedom highlights the broader struggle for justice in Egypt. “adel is a prisoner of opinion,” she says, “and he deserves to be compensated for the lost years of his life.” Her appeal to President El-Sisi underscores the growing calls for reform in Egypt’s judicial and prison systems.As the world watches, Adel’s case serves as a reminder of the urgent need for openness and accountability in addressing human rights violations. The international community continues to monitor Egypt’s progress,particularly as it prepares for its next UN human rights review.
Key Facts at a Glance
| Aspect | Details |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Imprisonment start | 2018 |
| New Cases Filed | Two additional cases during imprisonment |
| Scheduled Release | September 2027 |
| health Concerns | Multiple deteriorations; 50-day hunger strike in 2024 |
| Current prison | Tenth of Ramadan Prison |
| Appeals for Pardon | Direct appeal to President El-Sisi; supported by national Council for Human rights |
Adel’s story is a poignant example of the challenges faced by prisoners of conscience in Egypt. As his wife and supporters continue their fight for his release, the world waits to see whether justice will prevail.
For more details on Egypt’s human rights record, visit the United Nations Human Rights Council.
What can you do? Share this story to raise awareness about Adel’s case and the broader issue of human rights in Egypt.Your voice matters.
Egypt’s Human Rights Progress: Cosmetic Steps or Genuine Reform?
In 2019, Egypt faced a pivotal moment during its Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the United Nations. The review resulted in 372 recommendations aimed at improving the country’s human rights record. Egypt accepted 270 of these recommendations, including measures to shorten military trials for civilians and join the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance. These steps were hailed as significant, but the question remains: are these reforms merely cosmetic, or do they represent genuine progress?
As Egypt prepares for its next UPR in October 2024, the debate over its human rights record has intensified. The Egyptian Foreign Minister, Badr Abdel-Ati, will lead the delegation, presenting the country’s progress report. Meanwhile, Tariq Al-Khouli, Undersecretary of the Parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee and a member of the presidential Pardon Committee, emphasizes that Egypt’s efforts are driven by a “national will” to improve human rights, not just to appease international scrutiny.
However, not everyone is convinced. On December 17, 2024, 12 Egyptian human rights organizations published a joint report, describing the past five years as a period of “exacerbation of the human rights crisis in Egypt.” The report, submitted to the United Nations, highlights ongoing issues such as enforced disappearances, torture, prolonged pretrial detention, and imprisonment for expressing opinions.
Mohamed Zuharah,director of the Cairo Center for Human Rights Studies,argues that initiatives like the national human rights strategy,the Presidential Amnesty Committee,and the national dialog are “just cosmetic steps that have no real influence.” He adds, “What we monitored in the report from human rights violations in Egypt, such as violations related to the right to life, combating execution, torture, and forced concealment, means that there is no progress as the previous review in 2019.”
Al-Khouli, on the other hand, counters that Egypt has made tangible achievements in civil and political rights. He points to the implementation of accepted recommendations as evidence of progress. Yet, the stark contrast between government claims and the findings of human rights organizations raises critical questions about the depth and sincerity of these reforms.
Key Points at a Glance
| Aspect | Government Outlook | Human Rights Organizations’ Perspective |
|———————————|——————————————————————————————-|————————————————————————————————————-|
| Military Trials for Civilians | Shortened trial periods implemented | No significant reduction in military trials for civilians |
| Enforced Disappearances | joined the International Convention for Protection from Enforced Disappearance | Ongoing cases of enforced disappearances reported |
| Pretrial detention | Claims of improved detention conditions | Prolonged pretrial detention remains a widespread issue |
| Freedom of Expression | National dialogue and amnesty initiatives launched | Continued imprisonment for opinion-related offenses |
The Road Ahead
As Egypt prepares to present its report to the UN in October 2024, the international community will be watching closely. The government’s efforts to showcase progress will be scrutinized against the findings of human rights organizations. While initiatives like the national human rights strategy and the Presidential Amnesty Committee are steps in the right direction, critics argue that they lack the substance needed to address systemic issues.
For Egypt, the challenge lies in bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality. As Al-Khouli notes, the country’s reforms are driven by a “national will,” but the true test will be whether these measures translate into meaningful change for its citizens.
What do you think about Egypt’s human rights reforms? Are they genuine steps forward,or merely superficial changes? Share your thoughts and join the conversation.
For more details, read the full joint report by Egyptian human rights organizations here and Egypt’s official UPR report here.
The National Council for Human rights (NCHR) has reaffirmed its commitment to advancing human rights in Egypt,despite its lack of executive authority. The council is actively participating in the review of Egypt’s human rights record before the United Nations,contributing reports that shed light on the country’s progress and challenges in this critical area.
Ambassador Mushira Khattab, President of the NCHR, emphasized the council’s role in advocating for reforms, stating, “The council succeeded in pushing the implementation of Egypt’s recommendations from the previous review, through its contribution to drafting a new law for criminal procedures.” This effort is part of a broader push to align Egypt’s legal framework with international human rights standards.
Key Achievements in Human Rights Reform
The NCHR has played a pivotal role in several legislative advancements, including:
- Amendments to the Criminal Procedures Law: The new law reduces the maximum period of pre-trial detention for misdemeanors from 6 months to 4 months and for crimes from 18 months to 12 months. In cases involving life imprisonment or the death penalty, the detention period has been capped at 18 months instead of two years.
- Prison regulation law: Reforms have been introduced to improve conditions within detention facilities.
- Legal Asylum framework: The council has contributed to the development of a legal framework for asylum seekers.
- National Dialogue Initiative: This initiative aims to foster open discussions on pressing national issues, including human rights.
- Presidential Pardon Committee: Established to review cases of detainees and recommend pardons where appropriate.
these reforms reflect the NCHR’s dedication to addressing long-standing concerns raised by international bodies and local advocates.
Challenges and Limitations
Despite its efforts, the NCHR acknowledges its limitations. “We have no authority, but our effort is clear,” the council stated, highlighting its advisory role rather than executive power. This distinction underscores the challenges faced by the council in ensuring the full implementation of its recommendations.
A Visual Insight
| Reform Area | Key Changes |
|——————————-|———————————————————————————|
| Criminal Procedures Law | Reduced pre-trial detention periods for misdemeanors and crimes. |
| Prison Regulation Law | Improved conditions and oversight in detention facilities. |
| Legal Asylum Framework | Established a legal framework for asylum seekers. |
| National Dialogue Initiative | Promoted open discussions on human rights and national issues. |
| Presidential Pardon Committee | Reviewed detainee cases and recommended pardons. |
Looking Ahead
The NCHR’s ongoing efforts demonstrate a commitment to fostering a culture of human rights in Egypt. While challenges remain, the council’s work in legislative reform and advocacy provides a foundation for future progress.
For more updates on Egypt’s human rights initiatives,follow the National Council for Human Rights on their official Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights Addresses Key Cases and Challenges
In a recent statement, Moushira Khattab, President of Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights (NCHR), reaffirmed the council’s commitment to addressing human rights concerns in the country. Khattab emphasized the council’s role in receiving and investigating complaints, highlighting its contributions to resolving high-profile cases, including the release of political activist Ziad Al-Alimi through the Presidential Pardon Committee. “The council has a committee that receives strong complaints, allowing anyone subjected to violations to communicate with it,” Khattab stated. “The committee researches these complaints and submits them to the concerned authorities. Many cases have been resolved, including the release of Ziad Al-Alimi.” One of the most prominent cases addressed by the NCHR is that of Alaa Abdel-Fattah, a leading figure in Egypt’s January 2011 revolution that toppled former President hosni Mubarak. Abdel-Fattah, a vocal critic of President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, has been imprisoned multiple times as 2006, most recently in 2019, when he was sentenced to five years for “publishing false news.” Khattab revealed that the NCHR has been actively involved in Abdel-Fattah’s case, submitting a presidential pardon request and facilitating his transfer to a better prison during a hunger strike. “We communicated with his family, reviewed his medical reports, and personally handed over items from his family through the Ministry of interior,” she noted. Despite these efforts, Abdel-Fattah remains incarcerated. Human Rights Watch has called for his release, criticizing the Egyptian authorities for refusing to count more than two years of his pretrial detention toward his sentence. Khattab acknowledged that Egypt’s human rights record requires improvement, stating, “This is an crucial reason for the existence of the council and the continuation of our work. Although we are not a decision-making or executive authority, we strive to address these challenges.” She also addressed the perception that human rights advocacy threatens national security, asserting, “Human rights do not threaten national security or the stability of states. We work to establish this conviction.” Though, she expressed concern over the language used by some government officials in response to human rights reports, emphasizing that no state is without challenges in this area. | Case | Details | NCHR Involvement | The NCHR’s efforts underscore the complexities of addressing human rights in egypt. While the council has made strides in resolving individual cases, systemic challenges remain. Khattab’s remarks highlight the delicate balance between advocacy and governance, as well as the ongoing need for dialogue and reform. As Egypt continues to navigate its human rights landscape, the NCHR’s role as a mediator and advocate remains crucial. For more updates on Egypt’s human rights developments, follow Human Rights Watch and stay informed about global efforts to promote justice and accountability. What are your thoughts on Egypt’s human rights progress? Share your views in the comments below and join the conversation. In a recent statement, Moushira Khattab, President of Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights (NCHR), reaffirmed the council’s commitment to addressing human rights concerns in the country.Khattab emphasized the council’s role in receiving and investigating complaints,highlighting its contributions to resolving high-profile cases,including the release of political activist Ziad Al-Alimi through the Presidential Pardon Committee. “The council has a committee that receives strong complaints, allowing anyone subjected to violations to communicate with it,” Khattab stated. “The committee researches these complaints and submits them to the concerned authorities. many cases have been resolved,including the release of Ziad Al-Alimi.” One of the most prominent cases addressed by the NCHR is that of Alaa Abdel-fattah,a leading figure in Egypt’s January 2011 revolution that toppled former President hosni Mubarak. Abdel-Fattah, a vocal critic of President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, has been imprisoned multiple times sence 2006, most recently in 2019, when he was sentenced to five years for “publishing false news.” Khattab revealed that the NCHR has been actively involved in abdel-Fattah’s case, submitting a presidential pardon request and facilitating his transfer to a better prison during a hunger strike. “We communicated with his family, reviewed his medical reports, and personally handed over items from his family through the ministry of Interior,” she noted. Despite these efforts, Abdel-Fattah remains incarcerated.Human Rights Watch has called for his release, criticizing the Egyptian authorities for refusing to count more than two years of his pretrial detention toward his sentence. Khattab acknowledged that Egypt’s human rights record requires advancement, stating, “This is a crucial reason for the existence of the council and the continuation of our work. Although we are not a decision-making or executive authority, we strive to address these challenges.” She also addressed the perception that human rights advocacy threatens national security, asserting, “Human rights do not threaten national security or the stability of states. We work to establish this conviction.” However, she expressed concern over the language used by some government officials in response to human rights reports, emphasizing that no state is without challenges in this area.Alaa Abdel-Fattah: A Symbol of Egypt’s Human rights Struggle
Egypt’s Human Rights Record: Challenges and Progress
Key Cases and NCHR Contributions
|————————-|—————————————————————————–|————————————————————————————-|
| Ziad Al-Alimi | Released through Presidential Pardon Committee | Facilitated complaint resolution and release |
| Alaa Abdel-Fattah | Imprisoned since 2019; sentenced for “publishing false news” | Submitted pardon request, facilitated prison transfer, and reviewed medical reports |
| Pretrial Detention | Authorities refused to count two years of pretrial detention for Abdel-fattah| Advocated for fair treatment and compliance with international standards | Moving Forward: Advocacy and Accountability
Egypt’s National Council for Human Rights: Addressing Key Cases and Challenges
Alaa Abdel-Fattah: A Symbol of Egypt’s Human Rights Struggle
Egypt’s Human Rights Record: Challenges and Progress
Key Cases and NCHR Contributions
| Case | Details | NCHR Involvement |
|---|---|---|
| Ziad Al-Alimi | Released through Presidential Pardon Committee | Facilitated complaint resolution and release |
| Alaa Abdel-Fattah | Imprisoned as 2019; sentenced for “publishing false news” | Submitted pardon request, facilitated prison transfer, and reviewed medical reports |
| Pretrial Detention | Authorities refused to count two years of pretrial detention for Abdel-Fattah | Advocated for fair treatment and compliance with international standards |
Moving Forward: Advocacy and accountability
The NCHR’s efforts underscore the complexities of addressing human rights in Egypt. While the council has made strides in resolving individual cases, systemic challenges remain. Khattab’s remarks highlight the delicate balance between advocacy and governance, as well as the ongoing need for dialog and reform.
As Egypt continues to navigate its human rights landscape,the NCHR’s role as a mediator and advocate remains crucial. For more updates on Egypt’s human rights developments, follow Human Rights Watch and stay informed about global efforts to promote justice and accountability.
Looking Ahead
The NCHR’s ongoing efforts demonstrate a commitment to fostering a culture of human rights in Egypt. While challenges remain, the council’s work in legislative reform and advocacy provides a foundation for future progress.
For more updates on Egypt’s human rights initiatives, follow the national Council for Human Rights on their official facebook page.
What are your thoughts on Egypt’s recent human rights reforms? Share your opinions in the comments below.