People’s Party Stumbles in Provincial Elections, Fails to Capitalize on Key Battlegrounds
Table of Contents
The People’s Party experienced a disappointing outcome in the recent Provincial Administrative Organization (PAO) elections held on February 1, 2025, securing only a single PAO presidency in the northern province of Lamphun. this outcome raises questions about the party’s strategy and its ability to connect with local voters. Key battlegrounds like Phuket and Trat, previously identified as potential wins, revealed meaningful challenges for the party, highlighting a disconnect between national-level popularity and success in local elections. The results underscore the importance of local knowledge, patronage networks, and effective get-out-the-vote strategies, elements were the People’s Party appears to have fallen short.
phuket: A Missed Prospect
Phuket, with its predominantly urban population and relatively high average monthly household income of nearly 42,000 baht (US$1,244) in 2023, seemed like a promising target for the People’s Party. The party’s success in the 2023 general election, where the Move Forward Party (MFP) won all three parliamentary seats, further fueled expectations.The People’s Party fielded Lersak Leenanitikul, a brain surgeon and deputy director of Phuket’s largest public hospital, as their candidate.His medical credentials were prominently featured in campaign materials, aiming to appeal to the province’s educated and urban electorate.
However, Lersak, a political newcomer, struggled to navigate the intricacies of local politics. He was perceived as more comfortable with policy proposals than grassroots campaigning, hindering his ability to connect with voters on a personal level. The incumbent PAO president, Rewat Arirob, running under the banner “The Phuketians You Can Rely On,” benefited from the tacit endorsement of established elite families who were wary of the progressive wave represented by the People’s Party. Rewat’s campaign slogan, we work every day, really do things, don’t sell dreams,
directly targeted the perceived idealism of the People’s Party.
Lersak’s campaign was further hampered by a slate of inexperienced PAO council candidates, none of whom secured a victory. Ultimately, Lersak received only 44,602 votes, significantly less than Rewat’s 86,616. The low voter turnout in Phuket also contributed to the People’s Party’s defeat, as many younger supporters were unable to vote due to work commitments or being employed outside the area.
trat: A Close Call Underscores Local Dynamics
In the eastern province of Trat, the People’s Party came close to securing a victory. Their candidate, Chonlatee Numnoo, a former senior government official, garnered 35,588 votes, narrowly missing the 41,445 votes received by the incumbent PAO president, Wichian Sapcharoen. Wichian, a long-serving figure, ran under the slogan The same as before,
a direct response to the move Forward Party’s 2023 campaign theme of Not the same as before.
Despite Wichian’s perceived limitations, including being reportedly unable to navigate the Internet, he benefited from his established network and reputation for funding local projects. One informant suggested that even if Chonlatee had won, PAO bureaucrats loyal to Wichian would likely have sabotaged the new president’s initiatives, highlighting the deep-rooted influence of local patronage networks.
The People’s Party’s near-victory in trat was also influenced by a split in the incumbent’s vote. Charoen Chalalai, Wichian’s deputy, ran against his former boss, drawing over 20,000 votes and creating an opening for Chonlatee. Without Charoen’s intervention, the outcome in Trat might have mirrored the more decisive defeat in Phuket.
As the People’s Party discovered to its cost, PAO elections are generally won not by party image-building or well-crafted policy offerings. Rather, they hinge on local knowledge, patronage networks and a well-developed ability to get the vote out.
Lessons Learned (or not)
The 2025 PAO elections in Phuket and Trat underscore the challenges faced by the people’s Party in engaging with the complexities of local politics. The party’s reliance on national branding and policy proposals proved insufficient in overcoming the established networks and local dynamics that often determine the outcome of PAO elections. The party’s failure to learn from its previous setbacks in the 2020 PAO elections raises concerns about its ability to adapt its strategy and effectively compete at the local level.
The results serve as a reminder that success in Thai politics requires more than just popular policies and charismatic candidates. It demands a deep understanding of local issues, strong relationships with community leaders, and a well-organized get-out-the-vote operation. The People’s Party must address these shortcomings if it hopes to achieve greater success in future local elections.
Thailand’s Local Power Plays: Dissecting teh People’s Party’s Provincial Election Setback
The recent Thai Provincial Administrative Organization (PAO) elections delivered a stark reality check for the People’s Party,highlighting the chasm between national popularity and local political success. Is this a sign of a broader shift in Thai political dynamics?
Interviewer (Senior editor, world-today-news.com): Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in Southeast Asian politics, welcome to world-today-news.com. The People’s Party’s underwhelming performance in the recent PAO elections has raised eyebrows. Can you shed light on why a nationally recognized party struggled so significantly at the local level?
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. The People’s Party’s struggles in the PAO elections underscore a basic truth about Thai politics: success at the national level doesn’t automatically translate to local victories. These elections are fiercely contested battles grounded in local networks, personal connections, and deeply ingrained patronage systems. The party’s reliance on national-level branding and policy proposals, while effective in general elections, proved insufficient to overcome these deeply rooted local dynamics.
Interviewer: The article highlights the party’s defeats in key battlegrounds like Phuket and Trat. Can you analyze these specific cases and what they reveal about the challenges faced by the People’s Party?
Dr.Sharma: Absolutely. Phuket, with its affluent and educated population, presented a unique challenge. The People’s Party’s candidate, while possessing extraordinary credentials, lacked the crucial local connections and grassroots support necessary to win. His focus on policy, rather than personal engagement with voters, proved detrimental. The incumbent, emphasizing his track record with the slogan “we work every day, really do things, don’t sell dreams,” effectively countered the party’s perceived idealism. This illustrates the importance of tangible achievements and established networks in PAO elections.
Trat offers a different, yet equally revealing, narrative.The People’s Party came close, showcasing the potential for success with strategic adjustments. However, the incumbent’s extensive local network and his rival’s significant vote split highlighted the power of existing patronage and the instability inherent in challenging entrenched power structures. Even a strong campaign can be undermined by established local factions.
Interviewer: The article mentions the importance of “get-out-the-vote” strategies. How crucial is this element in the context of Thai PAO elections,and where did the People’s Party fall short?
Dr. Sharma: Voter turnout is paramount in any election, but it holds particular importance in PAO elections. These often have lower participation rates than national-level elections. The people’s Party clearly underestimated the importance of a comprehensive get-out-the-vote strategy. In Phuket, for instance, the low turnout disproportionately affected younger potential voters, a crucial demographic in manny Thai provinces. Effective mobilization needs to address the unique challenges and characteristics of each target population. This requires detailed understanding of voter demographics and utilizing diverse channels to reach and engage them.
Interviewer: What key lessons shoudl the People’s Party, and other political parties looking to compete effectively in PAO elections, learn from this outcome?
Dr. sharma: The People’s Party needs to fundamentally re-evaluate its approach to local politics. Here are key takeaways:
Prioritize grassroots engagement: Building strong personal connections with community leaders and voters is essential. Policy proposals alone are insufficient.
Cultivate local networks: Invest time and resources in developing relationships with established figures within local communities.
Develop effective get-out-the-vote strategies: Understand the specific challenges of voter mobilization in each province and tailor strategies accordingly.
Invest in candidate training: Ensure candidates possess the skills needed to navigate the intricacies of local politics and engage voters effectively. They need to understand the importance of personal campaigning and demonstrating tangible achievements.
* Acknowledge and adapt to regional variations: Recognize that the political landscape differs significantly across Thailand’s various regional contexts.
Interviewer: Beyond this specific election, what does this outcome signify about the broader dynamics of Thai politics?
Dr. Sharma: This election outcome highlights the enduring strength of local power structures in Thailand. While national-level parties can gain popularity,their influence often weakens at the local level. This underscores that future success hinges on building durable local coalitions and understanding the specific political dynamics within each province. Successfully leveraging established local networks while engaging with new populations is vital for future elections.
Interviewer: dr. Sharma, thank you for these insightful perspectives on the complexities of Thai local politics. This analysis provides critical context for understanding the PAO election results and their implications for the future of Thai politics. What are your final thoughts for our readers?
Dr.Sharma: The People’s Party’s experience serves as a powerful reminder that national success doesn’t guarantee local dominance. Engaging with the nuances of Thai local politics requires a dedicated and nuanced strategy that goes beyond party branding and policy platforms. Understanding local networks, priorities, and voter mobilization techniques is vital for achieving meaningful success. We encourage readers to share their perspectives on these crucial issues in the comments below or on social media. Let’s continue this discussion around the evolving political landscape of Thailand.