Home » News » DPS-Dogan Seeks Temporary Commission for KTB, Bulgartabac, and the Eight Dwarfs | Fakti.bg News

DPS-Dogan Seeks Temporary Commission for KTB, Bulgartabac, and the Eight Dwarfs | Fakti.bg News

Bulgaria’s Political Crisis: DPS Vows to End the “Peevski model” and Corruption Schemes

In a bold declaration, Sevim Ali, a ⁣deputy from the parliamentary group of ⁢the Movement for Rights and ‍Freedoms (DPS) and chairman of the parliamentary committee on‍ agriculture, food,‌ and forests, has announced that his party is committed⁢ to ending the so-called “Peevski model” and corruption schemes‍ in Bulgaria. Speaking on BTV’s “Face to Face” program,Ali ⁣emphasized that​ the decision to participate ⁣in government was driven ‌by a statesmanship approach to resolve the country’s political ⁣crisis,not by fear.

“We were not driven by fear. We took the decision to participate in management after⁢ a meeting of our collective bodies. We took⁢ a statesmanship ​decision so⁢ that Bulgaria could get out of ⁣the political ‍crisis. We will ‌stop corruption schemes, this is included in⁢ the management‌ program.We will work not only to stop‍ corruption‍ schemes,but⁣ also to stop the ‘Peevski’ model,which is‍ harmful to Bulgaria,” Ali stated.

The “Peevski ‌model” refers to the alleged influence of Delyan Peevski, the leader of DPS – New Beginning, over Bulgarian governance. Peevski, a controversial figure often accused of corruption and influence peddling, has ‍been a central ⁢figure in Bulgaria’s political landscape. According to Ali, the model has used state institutions as ⁣a “club” to suppress political opponents ⁢and enforce Peevski’s agenda.

“This is an insurance that in this way the ⁢harmful influence of Delyan Peevski ⁢and the ‘Peevski’ ‍model over Bulgaria will be limited. Becuase of this model, ⁢during the election⁤ campaign ⁢we had classic⁣ examples of political showdown with political opponents, repression⁣ with the help of KPKONPI on people who do not share the same view with the ⁤ ‘WHO’ model,” ⁤Ali explained.

the “Glavchev” cabinet, which preceded the current government, was allegedly used as a “rubber stamp” to execute Peevski’s whims. ali highlighted that while it was initially ⁢claimed​ that Peevski had no⁣ influence over regional governors, he‌ later⁢ called for their resignations, showcasing his continued grip on power.‌

The DPS’s commitment to dismantling the “Peevski⁢ model” ‍aligns with broader efforts to curb corruption in Bulgaria. The party’s management program explicitly includes measures to‌ stop corruption schemes, ​signaling a shift⁢ toward greater clarity and accountability.

Key Points at a Glance

| Aspect | Details ​ ⁣ ⁢ ‍ ​ ⁢ ‍ ⁤ ‌ ⁢ |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Primary Goal ​ | End the “Peevski model” and corruption schemes in Bulgaria. |
|‍ Speaker ‌ ⁤⁤ | Sevim Ali, DPS deputy and chairman of ‍the parliamentary committee. ‌ ‌ ⁢​ ⁢ |
| Statement | “We will stop corruption schemes, this is ⁣included ‍in the management program.” |
| Allegations ⁣ ‍‍ ‍‌ | State institutions ‌used ⁣as a “club” to⁢ enforce Peevski’s agenda.|
| Previous Government | “Glavchev” cabinet accused of being a “rubber stamp” for Peevski’s whims. |

The DPS’s ‌stance reflects a growing demand for political reform in Bulgaria, where corruption ⁢and undue​ influence ​have ⁤long plagued governance. by addressing the “Peevski model” head-on, the party aims to restore public trust and ​pave the way for a more‍ equitable political system.

For more insights into Delyan Peevski’s controversial role in Bulgarian politics, explore this detailed profile.

What ​are your thoughts on Bulgaria’s efforts to combat corruption?⁤ Share your⁢ views in ​the comments below.

Bulgaria’s ‍Political Landscape: Calls⁤ for Transparency and Accountability Amid Corruption Scandals

Bulgaria’s political⁢ sphere is once again under scrutiny as calls for ‍transparency and accountability grow louder. Sevim ⁤Ali, a ⁣prominent political figure, has proposed the establishment of a temporary parliamentary commission to investigate⁤ a series of high-profile corruption scandals that have plagued the country. These‍ include‌ the infamous cases‌ involving Bulgartabac, KTB (Corporate Commercial Bank), and the “Eight Dwarfs” scandal, among others.Ali emphasized that these‍ investigations are crucial to uncovering the truth behind what he described as the “eevski” model, a term used⁢ to denote ⁣harmful ‌and corrupt practices that have allegedly damaged Bulgaria’s economic and political integrity. “We will propose to create a temporary commission in the parliament for the scandals with Bulgartabac, with⁤ KTB, with Eight ‌Dwarfs, with BBR. There are many examples of ⁢corrupt practices of this model in the past,” Ali ‍stated.

The proposed commission aims to shed light on these controversies ​and provide clarity to Bulgarian society.Ali’s call for action underscores the need for political accountability, notably in the wake of these long-standing scandals. “For all this, we will ask for a commission of inquiry to make everything clear to Bulgarian society,” he added.

Political ‌Responsibility and‌ Governance

Ali also addressed the role of political participation, emphasizing that it is not merely about⁤ holding power but about bearing responsibility.”For us, the participation of the authorities is not⁤ an end in itself, but⁤ our ‌participation is a guarantee of ​sharing political responsibility. We do not run away from responsibility; for⁣ us,‌ participation in power is bearing responsibility,”‍ he explained.

To this end, ali revealed that⁤ his team⁣ has prepared a pool of qualified personnel ready to take on⁣ key roles in governance. “We have prepared personnel—we can be useful with deputy ministers, ⁣with regional governors, with deputy regional ⁤governors,” he said. This move⁢ signals a commitment to effective governance and a proactive approach to addressing the ⁢country’s challenges. ‌

Public ⁤Engagement and Trust

The call for a‍ commission of inquiry reflects a broader effort to restore public trust in Bulgaria’s political institutions. By addressing these ‍scandals head-on, Ali and his team aim⁢ to demonstrate their dedication to ⁤transparency and‌ accountability.

| ‌ Key Scandals Under Investigation |
|————————————–|
| Bulgartabac ⁢ ⁤ |
| KTB (Corporate Commercial Bank) ⁢ | ⁢
| Eight ‍Dwarfs ​ ⁣ ⁢ |
| BBR ⁤ ⁤ ⁢ ‌ ⁤ ​ |

Moving Forward ‌

As Bulgaria navigates these‍ turbulent times, the proposed commission ‍represents a critical step toward addressing systemic corruption‌ and fostering a culture of accountability. Ali’s emphasis on ⁤political responsibility and preparedness for governance‍ highlights a forward-looking approach ‍to leadership.⁤

For more insights into Bulgaria’s political landscape‍ and ongoing efforts to combat corruption, ‍stay tuned to our updates.

What are your thoughts⁤ on these developments? Share your opinions in the comments below.

Interview with ​Sevim ali: Bulgaria’s Fight Against Corruption and the “Peevski Model”

Editor: Sevim Ali, thank you for joining us today.Let’s start with the‍ recent​ allegations surrounding the “Peevski model”.Can ‍you elaborate⁢ on what this ‍model entails and why​ it’s ⁣a concern for Bulgaria?

Sevim Ali: ​ Thank you for having me. The “Peevski⁤ model” ​refers⁢ to a system of undue influence and⁢ corruption ‍that has permeated Bulgaria’s political and economic institutions. ⁢It’s characterized by the misuse of state power to enforce personal agendas,often at ⁣the ⁤expense of public interest. This model has been linked to high-profile scandals ⁤like Bulgartabac, KTB,and the‌ “Eight Dwarfs” case. These ⁤scandals have ⁢not only damaged Bulgaria’s‍ economy ⁢but also eroded public trust in⁣ governance.

editor: ‍ You’ve⁣ proposed​ a ⁤temporary parliamentary commission to investigate these scandals.What do ‌you hope to achieve with this initiative?

Sevim Ali: The primary goal ⁤of this‌ commission is to‌ bring openness and ⁤accountability‌ to these long-standing issues. By​ thoroughly investigating ​cases like Bulgartabac, KTB, and the “Eight Dwarfs”, we ‌aim to uncover the ⁢truth‌ and provide clarity to Bulgarian society. This ⁤is a crucial step in dismantling ‌the “Peevski model” and ensuring that such corrupt practices are not repeated‍ in the future.

Editor: You’ve also mentioned the role of political obligation in governance. How⁤ does this tie into your efforts‍ to‍ combat corruption?

Sevim⁣ Ali: Political ⁤responsibility ⁣is at the core of our approach. For us, holding power‍ is not an end in itself; it’s about bearing responsibility for the ⁢well-being of the nation. We’ve⁣ prepared a pool⁤ of qualified personnel who are⁤ ready to take on key roles in governance, from deputy ministers to regional governors. This ensures that we have the right people in place to implement reforms and uphold accountability.

Editor: The “Glavchev” cabinet has been accused of‍ being a “rubber stamp” for Delyan Peevski’s⁤ agenda. How ⁢does this ⁢align with your ⁣critique of‍ the ⁤ “Peevski model”?

Sevim Ali: The “Glavchev” cabinet is a prime example of how state institutions​ can be manipulated ​to serve personal interests. Initially, ⁢it ⁢was claimed that Peevski had no⁢ influence over regional governors, but later, he ​called for their resignations,⁢ demonstrating his continued grip on ⁢power. This⁢ underscores the ‌need for⁢ systemic change to​ prevent such abuses‍ of power in⁢ the future.

Editor: What measures are​ included in⁣ the DPS’s management program to address ⁢corruption?

Sevim‌ Ali: Our management program explicitly includes measures to stop corruption schemes. This involves not only investigating past scandals ⁣but also ⁣implementing ⁢structural reforms to ensure greater transparency and accountability. We are committed to‍ restoring public trust ⁢and paving the way for a more ⁣equitable political system.

Editor: what ⁢message would you like to convey to the bulgarian ⁤public regarding these ‌efforts?

Sevim Ali: I want to assure the Bulgarian public‌ that we are fully committed to addressing these‍ issues head-on. Corruption and undue influence have plagued our governance for too long,and it’s time for change. By working together,we can restore trust in our institutions ​and‍ build a brighter future‍ for ‌Bulgaria.

Key Takeaways

  • The‍ “Peevski model” represents a system of corruption‍ and undue ‍influence in Bulgaria’s political and‍ economic institutions.
  • A temporary parliamentary commission is ​proposed to investigate high-profile scandals like Bulgartabac,KTB,and the “Eight Dwarfs”.
  • Political responsibility and qualified personnel ​are central⁢ to ⁣the DPS’s approach to‍ governance.
  • The “Glavchev” cabinet’s alleged role as a “rubber ⁢stamp” highlights the need for systemic change.
  • The DPS’s management program includes measures⁤ to ⁢stop corruption and restore public trust.

What are​ your thoughts on Bulgaria’s efforts to ‌combat ⁤corruption?⁢ Share your views in the comments below.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.