He may try to end democracy, but the system is so strong that his family will be the one to end first. His son-in-law, Ivanka’s husband, Jared Kushner, is preparing a book. That someone from the Trump family has read one is already news; perpetrating it can be a shock. Apart from a marketing operation.
The son-in-law threatens not with rubbish or outlandish prose; not with solid arguments or well-locked characters. Not with reflecting the eternal human passions, such as jealousy or envy. It seems that it is not his ambition to emulate Faulkner. No. It seems that the idea is to make a lot of money and make Donald Trump, a New Yorker from Queens, a millionaire by profession, television star, businessman, founder of companies, fall off a donkey (symbol of the Democrats to add insult to injury) and, among others. occupations, 45th President of the United States of America from January 20, 2017 to January 20, 2021.
Jared Kushner, who has a hard-to-pronounce name for a (future) successful writer, doesn’t pretend to be the ideal son-in-law, but the writer of the year. But it is not only he who represents the dissension with the patriarch; Ivanka, her daughter, wife of the bestseller, has publicly censured her father’s idea of pressuring Mike Pence, vice president at the time, not to accept Biden’s victory.
In addition, Ivanka has recognized the Democratic victory, the defeat of her father in 2020, which, indeed, must seem to Trump to be a real defeat. May your daughter deny you.
Now, the US Congress is investigating the assault on Capitol Hill, which occurred on January 6, 2021. Trump has branded that commission and its members as hateful leftist radicals. “They are weaving a false narrative and a chilling attempt to prosecute their political opponents,” the former Republican president said during a Nashville rally.
Note that he used the word ‘narrative’, which gives an idea of how deeply literary is getting into the Trump family, that already put they could found a publishing house and publish books for the poor. Subversive books, of course. Or about family relationships.
A collection on populism would not be bad either. In an article about Donald Trump, you always have to talk about populism, even though the term is vague, a cliché already, easy, and encompasses things as different as the Italian far-right, the English Brexiters, the Hungarian Faltons or the Putins. Trump is much more. Or much less. Back in vogue.
And it is that the congressional investigation is bringing Trump down the avenue of bitterness and not only because his complicity is being aired, the way in which he encouraged the assault. Also due to the fact that in his own party (is it his party?), There are voices, and so many, that show his disaffection, hatred or dissidence with him.
Among them, Liz Cheney stands out, whom Trump has called a left-wing fascist and whom he has filled with spears and invective. Trump is not very good as an epigramist and the art of insulting dispatches him with terms such as those cited, addressing the primary heart of that America that identifies the left with hell.
Cheney is Cheney’s daughter, which is logical. Given that surname, the strange thing is that she was the daughter of López or Estébanez. Her father’s name was Dick and he was Vice President with Bush, the bad guy, in whose Administration this 55-year-old lawyer who would deserve this section for herself. Tenacious second surname. It is the third in the Republican nomenclature in the chamber of congressmen and it whips Bush hard, becoming an emerging rather than an emerging figure and a guardian of the essence of a democratic Republican Party fully integrated into the system, not a party that produces figures like Trump.
The American media speculate on the return of this character from the Simpsons (it is not pejorative), a character also because of how he behaves and a character also now from a book, who knew how to connect with the American people, who knows how to make money, who wears suits that they hide their obesity (his weight was a state secret) and that he should become a shareholder of Twitter. Rather he has not left. Neither the spirit of him nor what he represents. A danger.
Someone who doubts the democratic victories of his opponents and who sympathizes with the idea that a parliament can be stormed. A ready. of book
–
