The reactions of progressive activists to the verdict in the Depp vs Heardov case are absolutely only! Probably the most watched lawsuit in the last few years has ended, which also managed to defend the wolf in Ukraine.
In a dispute between American actor Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard, she blamed him at home in the Washington Post for breaking the Caribbean pirt.
Jurors have ordered Amber Heardov to pay $ 15 million in damages for years. The judge then eventually reduced to $ 10.35 million. On the other hand, Johnny Depp has to pay two million fines for all his elements, which has nothing to do with his victory.
The verdict from this case is really the same: He perverted the progressive unfinished omlan mtus about the day of the privileged position of all him. On the contrary, it turned out that I was going to die.
Rna pro #metoo
Johnny Depp podpoila even his ex-wife Vanessa Paradis, who said the following words about them: Johnny known for 25 years. We have been partners for 14 years and together we have raised two children. Over the years, I’ve known Johnny as a kind, considerate, generous, and non-violent hunter and father. I’m aware of them, Amber Heardov has been blaming Johnny’s public for more than three years. This is not at all like the real Johnny I knew, and from my own years of experience I can assume that he was never a fighter or a rude to me.
If even an ex-lady can write something like this, we can take it as a very strong proof that Johnny Depp could not be a hunter with violence inclinations, as Amber Heardov poured him. Undoubtedly, this is a big rh for the #metoo asn movement associated with the call believe women (vte enm).
As a result of this process, narrative narrative cracks begin to emerge, claiming that only women can always be listed, who must a priori be reported as potential oppressors, who should always precautionarily apologize for their attacks.
For you mou zl mui
It was therefore interesting to observe some of the stimulus reactions from the progressive spectrum. often mentioned is nap. COMMENTARY Moiry Doneganov of the British left-wing newspaper Guardian: The court turned into a public orgy of misogyny. While most of the poison is formally directed against Amber Heard, it is said to get rid of the impression that it is indeed intended against widows and especially those who spoke of gender abuse and sexual violence during the peak period. Let’s find ourselves in a moment of fierce anti-feminist resistance.
In such cases, the progressives must have a virtually universal answer to all the problems of misogyny or sexism on his part. Nothing new or surprising. We had something similar in many forms at xkrt. Meme jt dle.
I didn’t follow the process, but …
Not very interesting were the reactions to the progressive Twitter in our little Czech pond. One treasure for all. Certain news in one of your tweets she poured out her heartas the privileged Johnny Depp raised over the poor poor Amber Heard.
The fact that a lot of people (from Esquire esko to the classic great queen and patriarchist) are annoyed by Depp (and sdl to abbreviate reposts) today. I didn’t follow the process, but to say that poor Depp, a rich pius full of privilege, was slowly perhaps canceled, not really.
Probably every little one has to fight for a strange Czech-English hatmatilka. However, the overall content of the tweeter is also sad. No, no one from the ultra-left der from the A2larm wrote it, but Mr. Jana Patokov from Denk N. him.
Victim blaming
In fact, she is actually asking that the progressive is constantly and manages a kind of so-called victim blaming. The victim of making an aggressor is really disgusting, and of course it pays even in the case of Johnny Depp.
But for one thing, I would agree with the editor. It is clear that she did not follow the process at all, otherwise she could not have produced such stupidity. It would be worthwhile for him not to have an opinion on something he obviously doesn’t know anything about, and not to blame him.
Have a nice day and a happy mind!
Pevzato with blog with the author’s consent
–
