An accurate distribution of condominium expenses is not provided. Knowing the legislation is the first step to be careful of those who take advantage of it!
Always be wary of those who feel too confident, because sometimes these are just the problems that citizens have to deal with. Not everyone knows this, but the Condominium expense distributions may be subject to unnecessary payments. This does not mean that it is always like this, but you have to pay attention to some details, which really make the difference. If there is any abuse they should be told, and any overpayments should be refunded. How can you spot a potential scam? Few elements, and protection is guaranteed.
The matter is managed by the Board Civil Code who quickly manages to be on the side of the citizens. Rights and responsibilities are referred to that regulatory framework. It should be remembered that the sharing condominium expenses is not always an easy situation to manage, although it may seem “obvious”. Well, to use a play on words, “there are no discounts on payments,” especially when the payments are a little excessive. Many citizens are deceived by this system!
The same man Supreme Court of Cassation he doesn’t tell them. In fact, only the last one follows the sentences of the case, he protected the interests of citizens who were under inadequate governance that was not right for them. The real problem is that you can lose a lot of money, so you will be surprised what the main points of the case are to protect yourself.
The best distribution of condominium expenses, anti-abuse guidelines!
Is there a way to protect your rights? It means know the rules reference and behave like a perfect condominium owner, because there is something to gain from it. There distribution of condominium expenses it angers many taxpayers who have been ripped off by the system. Never fail to take an interest in condominium issues and not attend meetings, because you could fall into a trap, becoming the “scapegoats” of the situation. Therefore, by studying a concrete case, we try to understand how costs should be shared.
![calculator, documents and scattered euro banknotes](https://i0.wp.com/www.trading.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/la-miglior-ripartizione-spese-di-condominio-25-10-2024-Trading.it_.jpg?resize=740%2C493&ssl=1)
In case there is any infiltration from the flat roof used only by a condominium, and restoration and maintenance work is required, who will pay the costs? The answer is the Civil Code in article No. 1126. This says that not all condominiums have to respond in the same way. Or rather, there are issues and situations that deserve due attention. It’s about identifying who makes special use of it and who doesn’t.
The first ones duty under the law to support 1/3 of the rebuild costs and maintenance. AN the remaining 2/3 is divided among the condominiums for which the pavement is used in a percentage lower than one thousandth. Therefore, they pay what they basically deserve. As a result, it is the aforementioned Court of Cassation that applies the criteria of the code.
This applies if the same does not exist however condominium contractual rules do not provide for other distributional allocations. Therefore, it is confirmed that we do not always work in the same way, but in relation to the condominium and the rules that apply.
In particular, i 2/3 left mentioned above though they don’t have to pay everyone a dime. It could also happen that these condominiums have property in the direct projection of the flat roof. This is in accordance with what was established by the Supreme Court in sentences no. 12,578 of 2017 and no. 11,484 in 2017.
It should not be taken into account in payments which has the sole use of the pavement unless it has other building units located in the direct view of the pavement itself. This is the air column under the pavement.
The applied criterion referred to is also adopted if repairs are due only as a result of events such as infiltration. This, however, is not confirmed the damage was not caused by a specific person, the latter is entirely responsible for the damage.
In short, the law tends to protect those who do not fully fall within it. Those who have a lower percentage of stakeholders do not have to pay as much as those who benefit more from it. Just as we try to help those who did not do the damage, why should they pay? In conclusion, pay attention to those “flaws” that no one talks about. Because there are those, to pay less, who would make innocent scapegoats spend millions of euros.
2024-11-04 21:30:00
#Distribution #condominium #expenses #abuse #pay #Trading.it