BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Moves Privilege motion Against rahul Gandhi Over Lok Sabha Speech
In a dramatic turn of events during the ongoing Budget Session 2025, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has filed a privilege motion against Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of presenting “shamelessly distorted historical facts” in his recent Lok Sabha speech. The motion, addressed to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, seeks action against Gandhi for allegedly misleading the House and undermining India’s prestige.
The controversy erupted on Monday when Gandhi, during the debate on the Motion of Thanks, claimed that Chinese troops were present on Indian soil. He attributed this to the “failure” of the Narendra Modi-led government’s ‘Make-in-India’ initiative. “Beijing is now sitting on over 4,000 sq km of our land,” Gandhi declared, further alleging that the Indian Army had contradicted the government’s assertion that no territory had been ceded to china.
Speaker Om Birla promptly demanded evidence for Gandhi’s claims, stating, “You will have to present the evidence of what you are speaking in the House.”
Dubey,in his letter to the Speaker,accused Gandhi of not only distorting facts but also attempting to “ridicule our country and lower the prestige of our Republic.” the breach of privilege notice, a legislative tool used against members found misusing their rights or misleading Parliament, has sparked a heated political debate.
Gandhi’s speech also touched on other contentious issues. He alleged that External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar visited the US in December 2024 to secure an invitation for Prime Minister Modi to attend Donald Trump’s January 20 inauguration. Additionally, he raised doubts about the Mahayuti coalition’s victory in the Maharashtra Assembly elections, calling for data from the Election Commission to scrutinize voter additions.
The BJP has vehemently denied Gandhi’s claims, with Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accusing him of “misleading the House.”
Key Points at a Glance
Table of Contents
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Privilege motion | Filed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against Rahul Gandhi for “distorted facts.” |
| Gandhi’s Claims | Alleged Chinese presence on Indian soil; criticized ‘Make-in-India’ policy.|
| Speaker’s Response | demanded evidence for Gandhi’s assertions. |
| additional Allegations| Jaishankar’s US visit; Mahayuti’s election victory questioned. |
The unfolding drama in the Lok Sabha underscores the deepening political divide, with both sides digging in their heels. As the privilege motion progresses, all eyes are on Speaker Om Birla’s next steps.
For more updates on this developing story, follow our live coverage here.
Privilege Motion Against Rahul gandhi: Expert insights on the Lok Sabha Controversy
In a fiery session of the Lok Sabha, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey filed a privilege motion against Rahul Gandhi, accusing him of presenting “distorted facts” during his speech. This move has intensified the political rift, stirring debates about parliamentary ethics and national security.To unpack the implications of this advancement, Senior editor Anika sharma of world-today-news.com sat down with Dr. Arvind Kapoor, a political analyst and expert on parliamentary procedures.
Understanding the Privilege Motion
Anika sharma: Dr. Kapoor, could you explain the meaning of the privilege motion filed by Nishikant Dubey? How does this parliamentary tool function?
Dr. Arvind Kapoor: Certainly, Anika. A privilege motion is a legislative mechanism used to address instances where a member of Parliament is perceived to have misled the House or abused their privileges. In this case, Dubey alleges that Rahul Gandhi’s speech contained distorted assertions about Chinese incursions and the ‘Make-in-India’ policy, which he claims undermines the dignity of the House. The Speaker,Om Birla,now has the authority to decide whether this constitutes a breach of privilege and what action,if any,should be taken.
Analyzing Rahul Gandhi’s Claims
anika Sharma: Gandhi’s speech touched on several sensitive topics,including the presence of Chinese troops on Indian soil and the effectiveness of the ‘Make-in-India’ initiative. What are your thoughts on these allegations?
Dr. Arvind Kapoor: Gandhi’s assertions are undeniably contentious.He claimed that chinese forces are occupying over 4,000 square kilometers of Indian territory,attributing this to the government’s policy failures. While border tensions with China have been a recurring issue, such claims require concrete evidence. The Speaker’s demand for substantiation is a standard parliamentary procedure to ensure that statements made in the House are factually accurate and not politically motivated.
The Speaker’s Role and Response
Anika Sharma: Speaker Om Birla has demanded evidence from Gandhi. How critical is the Speaker’s role in this situation, and what are the potential outcomes?
Dr. Arvind Kapoor: The Speaker’s role is pivotal. Om Birla’s call for evidence underscores the importance of maintaining the integrity of parliamentary debates. If Gandhi fails to provide credible proof, it could lead to censure or other disciplinary actions. Conversely, if he substantiates his claims, it might force the government to address these issues more transparently. Either way, the Speaker’s decision will set a precedent for how such allegations are handled in the future.
Broader Political Implications
Anika Sharma: Beyond the immediate controversy, what broader political implications does this episode carry?
Dr. Arvind Kapoor: This incident highlights the deepening polarization in Indian politics. Gandhi’s speech not only questioned the government’s defense policies but also raised doubts about External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s US visit and the Mahayuti coalition’s electoral victory in Maharashtra.These allegations, coupled with the privilege motion, signify a hardening of stances on both sides. It also underscores the challenges of conducting constructive parliamentary debates in a highly charged political surroundings.
Conclusion
Anika Sharma: Dr. kapoor, thank you for your insightful analysis. it’s clear that the privilege motion against Rahul Gandhi is more than just a procedural issue—it reflects the broader political tensions in the country. As this story unfolds, it will be crucial to see how Speaker Om Birla navigates these choppy waters and what it means for the future of parliamentary discourse.
Dr. Arvind Kapoor: Thank you, Anika. Indeed, this episode is a litmus test for parliamentary norms and the state of our democracy.Let’s hope it leads to greater accountability and clarity in our political processes.