-
AFP
—
1/8
For Disney, Meghan was the voice actress in the studio and took on the role of narrator in the film “Elephant” by Disneynature. The nature film will be available on Disney + from April 3rd.
—-
AFP
—
2/8
But Meghan has to take criticism for her use even before the production is released.
—-
imago images
—
3/8
The Times writes: “Meghan Markle has exchanged royal pomp for mischief and kitsch. The performance often feels too thick. »
—-
AFP
—
7/8
Meghan and Harry leave the royal era behind: Megxit, the voluntary departure from the British royal family, has been in effect since April 1.
—-
DUKAS
—
8/8
The two said goodbye to Instagram with a statement.
—-
—-
Prince Harry (35) and Duchess Meghan (38) now officially start the new chapter of their lives: The Megxit will apply from April 1st, voluntarily leaving the British royal family. Meghan has already done her first job away from the royal family.
–
For Disney, the ex “Suits” actress was the voice actress in the studio and took on the role of narrator in Disneynature’s film “Elephant”. The natural film will be available on Disney + from April 3rd – but Meghan has to accept criticism for its use even before the release of the production.
–
British and American film critics and journalists have already seen the documentary that accompanies the journey of the African elephant Shani, her son Jomo and the matriarch Gaia on a journey through the Kalahari desert. And sometimes make devastating judgments about Meghan’s performance in the film.
–
“Lard and Kitschiness”
The criticism of the US portal “Empire” states that Meghan’s “excited tone” fits perfectly with the “natural history film without corners and edges”. The journalist went on to say that Meghan’s way of commenting was “overzealous”. For example, he cites a scene in which the elephants in the film take a mud bath and Meghan says in the off: “It’s time for a pool party!” Meghan “just isn’t annoying enough.”
–
Strict is the critic of The Times. On the page it says something like: «Meghan Markle has exchanged the royal pomp for mischief and kitsch. The performance often feels too thick. » The text also says: “Even the not overwhelming scene in which the elephants tear bark off the tree is presented as if the best films were just being announced at the Oscars.” The critic gives two out of five stars.
–
It is clear to see that “this topic is very close to Meghan’s heart”
The criticism of the “Telegraph” is somewhat more conciliatory. It says that the documentary is “not exactly Attenborough” (the famous British animal filmmaker David Attenborough, editor’s note). Nevertheless, Meghans “honey-covered, deep voice hits the tone of the piece”.
–
Meghan receives praise for her film comeback at the “Express”. “Meghan comes across very warmly, with most of her lines sounding like she’s lovingly illuminating the elephants we’re watching … Sometimes that’s a little cheesy and sentimental, in a classic American Disney way.”
–
Her voice is “enthusiastic” and you can clearly see that “Meghan is very concerned about this topic.” This is hardly surprising: The fee Meghan received for the voice actor job was finally donated to the charity “Elephants Without Borders”. (kad)
—
Related
