Allegations of Misconduct Rock China Construction bank (Asia)
Table of Contents
A high-profile case involving allegations of misconduct at China Construction Bank (Asia) has drawn significant attention. Teh defendant,54-year-old Li Jinglun,former head of the department and general manager of the transaction Banking Sales Team,faces five charges,including three counts of non-consensual physical contact and two instances of alleged assault against a Korean female subordinate in 2023.
The Allegations
The victim recounted three incidents of non-consensual contact, stating she was “supervised” or had her hips held by the defendant without her consent. She described feeling “vrey surprised and surreal” during these encounters. By the third incident, she explicitly told the defendant, “Don’t touch me,” but later expressed regret for not speaking louder.
In the two alleged assaults,the victim claimed the defendant instructed her to stand beside him,touched her waist,and then clamped her face with his hand. She described his eyes as resembling those of someone “seeing cute children and doing this movement.”
Legal Proceedings
Li Jinglun denied all charges, and the case proceeded to interrogation. The prosecution called four witnesses, including the victim and individuals related to the “recent complaints.” The defense argued that the victim’s disclosure of the incidents to friends a week later did not meet the criteria of being “spontaneous.” however,the prosecution countered that the victim’s allegations were consistent and that her disclosures were voluntary,not “induced” by her friends.Referee Qu Liwen ruled that the provision of the relevant certificate was spontaneous and admissible for questioning.
victim’s Testimony
The victim, identified as Korean subject X, testified with the assistance of two interpreters. She detailed the incidents in chronological order, stating that the non-consensual contact occurred during a walk back to the office after a client meeting on March 16, 2023. she described the defendant’s behavior as using ”1 to 2 fingers” to touch her.
Key Points Summary
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Defendant | Li Jinglun,former general manager of China Construction Bank (Asia) |
| Charges | Three counts of non-consensual contact,two counts of assault |
| Victim’s Testimony | Described incidents as “surreal” and explicitly told defendant to stop |
| Legal Ruling | Referee Qu Liwen deemed victim’s disclosures spontaneous and admissible |
This case highlights the importance of addressing workplace misconduct and ensuring accountability at all levels of corporate leadership. For more details on the legal proceedings, refer to the news by following updates from Insurance Journal and U.S. News.
Hong Kong Manager Faces Multiple Charges Over Alleged Sexual Harassment and Assault
A 54-year-old company manager, Li Jinglun, has been charged with five offenses, including three counts of obscene acts and two counts of general assault, following allegations of repeated harassment and physical misconduct against a female colleague. The incidents, which occurred between March and June 2023, have sparked widespread attention and raised questions about workplace safety and accountability.
The Allegations: A Timeline of Events
The victim, referred to as Woman X, detailed a series of disturbing encounters with the defendant. On April 6, 2023, she reported that Li attempted to hold her hip while walking behind her. “The victim was very surprised and surreal at the time, looking back at the defendant, seeing him smiling at himself,” the statement read.She emphasized that she did not consent to his behavior and later told him, “no need to intentionally do it again.”
The situation escalated on June 1, 2023, when Li allegedly “supervised” her hips while on an escalator. The victim described the incident as “so anxious,” likening it to ”the speed of Taekwondo.” This time, she reacted instantly, telling him, “Don’t touch me.” The victim later expressed regret for not repeating this warning more forcefully.
Conversations with Friends and Emotional Impact
The victim confided in her friend, Shirley Chan, about the incidents. Messages exchanged between the two,translated from Korean,revealed the victim’s distress. On June 1,she wrote,”I’m afraid of going to work,” to which chan responded,”Alas…” and asked, “What is the trash reaction after you warn him?” The victim replied, “He panicked all the way back to the office, lucky that no one was around.”
When questioned about why she described Li as “panicked,” the victim explained that he appeared visibly flustered, his face red, and he began speaking incoherently.
Earlier Incidents: The “Folder Face” Allegation
The victim also recounted two earlier incidents that occurred between March and April 2023. During the first encounter, Li allegedly called her into his office under the guise of providing business guidance. Once inside, he instructed her to sit next to him, touched her waist, swept her arm, and clamped her face with his hand. The victim demonstrated the action, describing it as something one might do to a “cute child.”
The second incident, which occurred during the same period, followed a similar pattern. The victim noted that she was wearing a sleeveless shirt due to the hot weather, which may have contributed to the defendant’s behavior.
Charges and Legal Proceedings
Li Jinglun has been formally charged with three counts of obscene acts and two counts of general assault. The obscene acts allegedly took place on March 16,April 6,and June 1,2023,in locations including the flyover between the China Construction Bank Building and the AIA Financial Center,as well as the escalator at Land Plaza in Hong Kong.
The general assault charges stem from incidents that occurred in the trading service department on the third floor of the china Construction Bank Building between March and april 2023.
Key Details at a glance
| date | Location | Alleged Incident |
|—————–|—————————————|————————————————————————————-|
| March 16, 2023 | China Construction Bank Building | Obscene act involving physical contact |
| April 6, 2023 | AIA Financial Centre Flyover | Attempted hip grab; victim expressed disapproval |
| June 1, 2023 | Land Plaza Escalator | Hip “supervision” on escalator; victim warned, “Don’t touch me” |
| March-April 2023| Trading Service Department, CCB Building | Two incidents of physical assault, including waist and face touching |
Moving Forward
The case, registered under ESCC2838/2024, continues to unfold as the court examines the evidence and testimonies. The victim’s courage in coming forward has highlighted the importance of addressing workplace harassment and ensuring accountability for such actions.
For more information on workplace safety and legal rights, visit the Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission.
What are your thoughts on this case? Share your opinions in the comments below.
Interview: Understanding the Legal and Emotional Dimensions of Workplace Harassment in Hong Kong
Editor: Today, we’re discussing the recent case involving Li Jinglun, a Hong Kong manager charged with multiple offenses related too alleged workplace harassment.Joining us is Shirley Chan, a close friend of the victim, who has been a key confidante throughout this ordeal. Shirley, thank you for being here.
Shirley Chan: Thank you for having me. It’s important to shed light on these issues to create safer workplaces.
Editor: Can you provide some context on the case and how you became involved?
Shirley Chan: Sure. The victim, my friend, experienced repeated instances of unwanted physical contact and emotional distress at work. She confided in me about these incidents, and together, we worked on documenting the details to support her case.
Editor: The victim mentioned feeling “surprised and surreal” after the frist incident on April 6, 2023. Can you elaborate on her emotional state at the time?
Shirley Chan: Absolutely. She was in shock. She described feeling violated but also unsure of how to respond promptly. It’s a common reaction in such situations—people frequently enough second-guess themselves or fear the consequences of speaking up.
Editor: On June 1, 2023, the victim explicitly told li, “Don’t touch me.” What led to this stronger reaction?
Shirley Chan: By that point, she had reached her breaking point. The incident on the escalator was notably invasive, and she felt an immediate need to assert her boundaries. She later regretted not being more forceful in her earlier warnings, but it’s important to understand that it’s not easy to confront someone in a position of power.
Editor: The victim also recounted earlier incidents involving physical contact in the office. How did these experiences affect her?
Shirley Chan: those incidents left her feeling unsafe and anxious at work. She started questioning her environment and even avoided certain areas of the office. It’s heartbreaking to see someone you care about go through such emotional turmoil.
Editor: Li Jinglun has been charged with obscene acts and general assault. What are your thoughts on the legal proceedings so far?
Shirley Chan: I’m hopeful that the legal system will hold him accountable. The evidence is clear, and the victim has been incredibly brave in sharing her story. This case highlights the need for stronger workplace protections and better enforcement of existing laws.
Editor: What advice would you give to others who might potentially be experiencing similar situations?
Shirley Chan: First,know that you’re not alone. Document everything, confide in someone you trust, and seek legal advice as soon as possible. Organizations like the Hong Kong Equal Opportunities Commission can also provide valuable support and resources.
Editor: what do you hope will come out of this case?
Shirley Chan: I hope it sparks a broader conversation about workplace safety and accountability. No one should have to endure harassment, and it’s up to all of us to create a culture where such behavior is not tolerated.
Key Takeaways:
- The victim experienced repeated unwanted physical contact and emotional distress.
- Shirley Chan highlighted the importance of documenting incidents and seeking support.
- The case underscores the need for stronger workplace protections and accountability.
