Director-General of the Forest Department informed the mother “Thanathorn” to penetrate the forest for New Year’s Eve
Date: 30 Dec 2020 at 8:01 PM.
–
Director-General of the Department of Forestry calls for fault with ‘Somporn Chuengroongruangkit’, the mother of Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, the former head of the Future New Party, invading the forest of over 3,098 rai.
On December 30, at the Royal Thai Police, Mr. Adisorn Nuchdamrong, Director-General of the Department of Forestry, Mr. Cheevapapchivatham, Director of the Forest Preservation and Control Bureau, complained to Pol. Maj. Pitak-Uthai. Dharmapol, Pol. Pol. Pol. Pol. Pol. Piboon Wiangchan, Deputy Director of the Royal Thai Police, Pol. Pol. Pol. Soranusomthat, Ph.D. 5, BAAC and the investigating staff. PTTEP to prosecute Mrs. Somporn Chuengrungkijkij after inspecting a land encroachment in Ratchaburi
Mr. Adisorn said that due to Ms. Parina Kraikupt, MP, District 3, Ratchaburi, Palang Pracharath Party petitioned the Royal Forest Department to investigate 77 plots of land with a total area of more than 3,098 rai. Mrs. Somporn Chuengrungkij, the mother of Mr. Thanathorn Chuengroongruangkit Former Future Forward Party Leader In which the Royal Forest Department accepted a complaint that an illegal license was issued. After accepting the complaint, the Royal Forest Department has conducted a long audit due to the need to examine the documents and evidence from the relevant authorities. Until found that the land occupied It is a protected area and restricted area. In this regard, the Royal Forest Department received complaints from both villagers in the area. When the forest area that Somporn possessed was to be used for community forestry, but investigated and found that it was unlawful
However, the investigation found that There are 77 plots of related land title deeds, consisting of 1 land plot, 55 plots of Nor Sor 3 Kor, and Nor Sor 3 Kor. 3, 14 plots with a total area of over 3,098 rai, from which the inspection found all the land in the Phachi River Left Bank National Reserve and overlapped with the land reform area of the announced Agricultural Land Reform Office. 2011 and there are no plans with budget to operate, therefore, there is no effect on the delisting of the National Forest and all land plots overlaid in the Permanent Forest District No. 85 (1969).
Mr. Adisorn said that the 55 copies of the land of Nor Sor 3 Kor were issued without original evidence (August 1) as a walk-out survey in 1978 before declaring the area as a national forest in 1984, but The area was declared as a permanent forest area No. 85 in 1969, before all 55 NPS 3G documents were issued, which made them illegal at the time. However, from evidence to believe that Ms. Somporn intends to acquire the land of Nor Sor 2 by purchasing and transferring from other persons illegally, totaling 7 plots of 350 rai of land, the said plot of land is a Nor Sor 2 document, which is the issue of overlapping land in the National Forest Reserve. And there were complaints from villagers in Moo 14, Rang Bua Subdistrict, Chom Bueng District, Ratchaburi Province that had a plan to establish a community forest of the village. A representative of Mrs. Somporn Chuengrungruangkit has come out to investigate together with several officials, accepting possession and showing the intention of giving the village to establish a community forest of the village, which shows the intention to possess NS2 in an illegal way. Of Mrs. Somporn
It also found that Ms. Somporn has illegal possession of land in the form of law (Por Chapter 5). Plot of 90 rai in the area of Moo 3, Rang Bua Subdistrict, Chom Bueng District, Ratchaburi Province by examining the receipt of evidence indicating the name Ms. Somporn Chuengrungkij paid for the amount of land in the National Reserved Forests of 90 rai during the years 2010-2013 for one plot of land and 14 other Nor Sor 3 documents to expand the results of the investigation. That they are guilty of trespassing and seizing 450 rai of land in the National Reserved Forest (7 plots of land plot, Chapter 5 and Nor Sor 2) and reporting the prosecution of government officials in connection with the issuance of land rights documents. .3 Kor. 55 plots and proposes to the Department of Lands to revoke the land title document of Ms. Somporn Nor Sor 3 Kor, approximately 2,000 rai, which Mrs. Somporn was initially considered an offense under Section 14 National Forest Reserve Act 1964, Section 54 Forest Act 1941, said the Director-General of the Royal Forest Department.
Lt. Col. Piboon said Initially accepting the complaint before conducting an investigation according to the steps in the case of Ms. Parina’s invasion of the forest area, now that the process of operation, the police has sent the documents to the police commander to sign to Parliament to bring Miss Parina to the prosecutor, Ratchaburi Province, proceed in accordance with the law, as in the case of Mr. Thawee Krai Kupt, Ms. Parina’s father, found that the license has some points in the rightful possession until … will cut off this part, not proceed with the law, but the point of overlapping will be prosecuted according to the law, both of which will be clear after the new year and I confirm that the officials work honestly, do not have any contradiction. The city was involved and every process and evidence could be verified.
Mr. Warawut Silpa-archa, Minister of Natural Resources and Environment Gave an interview about the case of the Royal Forestry Department preparing to notify the prosecution Mrs. Somporn Therefore prosperity Mother of Mr. Thanathorn Therefore prosperity Chairman of the Faculty of Progress Invasion of the reserved forest in the area of 450 rai Ratchaburi province and propose to revoke the document of Nor Sor 3 Kor, 2,000 rai that in the work of the Ministry of Resources. We do not look at who or which party. We just look at the wealth of the country. Whether it is a protected forest or a protected forest has been invaded or not.
However, if an invasion comes up The ministry, as the complaint, is reported to the police. In which every case has been complained by the Ministry of Resources Will prosecute until the end We do not delay or benefit anyone. We prosecute according to the law and in accordance with the process of justice. No, there are 2 standards or absolutely discriminated against. We do justice and prosecute without looking at the person.
– .
