Daniel Stelter is the founder of the discussion forum beyond the obvious, which specializes in strategy and macroeconomics, and is a management consultant and author. Every Sunday goes up www.think-bto.com his podcast online.
–
(Photo: Robert Recker / Berlin)
–
–
–
–
Double annual production growth
Translated, this means nothing other than that the consumable part of the national income will decrease and also be significantly more controversial. A scenario that promises strong social tensions, even if – as has already been foreseen – a large part of climate protection expenditure is financed with loans and fresh money from the European Central Bank (ECB).
Compared to the pre-Corona period, we would have to double the annual productivity growth to compensate for the decline in the workforce. A real show of strength, the sooner we tackle it, the more likely it is to be successful.
There are enough starting points: a significant increase in the quality of education, a reduction in the number of early school leavers and people without vocational training, lifelong learning, upgrading of vocational training, focus of academic education on the MINT subjects, significantly more public investments and improved incentives for private investments.
In part, the new federal government has taken up issues such as underlining the commitment to more investment and the national target value for research and development expenditure. But that is by far not enough.
If we are serious about securing prosperity, politically uncomfortable issues must also be addressed, especially in the field of education. Demanding and promoting is essential, especially with a view to the cohort of young people without vocational training.
More: 63 billion euros per year – that’s why unemployment is so expensive in Germany
–
– .
Related