In a recent Gallup Korea survey, the approval rating of the Democratic Party fell again to the 20% level. (July 25-27, 1002 adult men and women across the country, response rate 14.1%, sampling error ±3.1%p at the 95% confidence level, for more information, refer to the websites of Gallup Korea and the National Election Survey Deliberation Committee)
Officials of the Democratic Party struggle to say that it is a difference in the investigation method, but it is clear that it is not connected to the support of the Democratic Party even though clear bad things have occurred in the government and the ruling party when viewed from the ‘trend’ award.
■ Lee Jae-myeong, ‘judicial risk’ prolonged, ‘coin’ Kim Nam-guk, Kim Eun-gyeong, innovation chairman
The protracted judicial risk of Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myeong may be one reason, but the ‘coin scandal’ of Rep. Kim Nam-guk and the ‘write-in vote on the arrest motion’ proposal and recent remarks by Innovation Committee Chairman Eun-kyung Kim, who brought in to innovate, are really embarrassing.
At a discussion with young people not long ago, Chairman Kim said that his son, who was a middle school student in the past, said, “Our future is much longer, why do people with a short future vote one-to-one?” He said, “It’s very reasonable (isn’t it)”, saying, “When you look at it, you have to vote in proportion from your age to your age, from your mother’s age to your age.”
He added, ″In a democratic country, there is a realistic difficulty in ‘one person, one vote’, but it is correct.″
I guess I couldn’t even make a shallow calculation about what kind of political repercussions my words could have and whether they would help the Democratic Party.
■ ″Why do people with short futures have one person, one vote?″ Mentioning her son’s remarks, ″Very reasonable″
Things that come in life do not come in order, but things that go do not go in order. How many votes should be given to ″short future″ and ″long future″ to make it ″reasonable″?
If the innovation chairman’s remarks became a problem, he would have to apologize quickly, but the Democratic Party’s innovation committee said, “Our politics has the task of adjusting the imbalance between generations, regions, and classes, and reflecting the voices of underrepresented subjects.” Even the idea of a middle school student, which was brought out as an example for this discussion, is being distorted.”
It is not that long ago that mankind had ‘one person, one vote’ without any difference between rich and poor, race and gender. But all of a sudden, proportional voting according to ‘Dawn’…
It is time to seriously think about whether an innovation committee that mentions ″middle school students’ ideas″ in a meeting with young people is necessary for the Democratic Party, rather than ″distorting the ideas of middle school students″.
■ Can we win the people’s strength in the general election next year?
2023-08-01 05:02:08
#Democrats #coming #innovation #committee
