“Democracy Intimidation: 8 Parties Sign MOU on Co-Forming a Government with Progressive Policies”

Moving forward with “democracy intimidation”, 8 parties, 313 votes, signed the MOU on “co-forming a government”

Under the principle of amending Section 112, the penalty will be reduced and moved from the category of “security” to the category of “rights and liberties”, similar to defamation of the general public.

let the institute be “Parties with the people” themselves want to sue people for defamation. Institutions must sue themselves. went to negotiate and compromise among themselves, but agreed

Local government reform, abolishing the “governor-appointed” system to become the governor come from elections like MPs

“Dividing the land – dividing the provinces” together to rule independently in the “election governor” system

Armed Forces Reform

Reduce people – reduce size – reduce weapons, end military conscription – move internal divisions Bangkok to other provinces, using fishing boats instead of warships

Dissolution of ISOC, dissolution of SBPAC and etc.

to the new era “Government electoral district The army is forbidden to enter”!

Issued three fingers amnesty for Mao Keng in prison. and all political persons both in the country and abroad

Labor wages increased to 450 baht and had to be increased every year.

Electric train 20 baht “throughout the line” all

People of all sexes and ages from birth to death There is a welfare allowance ranging from 3,000 baht to 10,000 baht.

Liquor-beer can be brewed independently, sold freely, and in the future, extending to “free sex” to promote equal freedom in the body of each person.

This is roughly from the Progressive Party policy that will be included in the MOU into practice. Under the policy of the 8-party government

If they agree, they will sign an MOU today!

How are you……….

Seeing roughly like this, you can smell the smell of prosperity, right?

Some people may peck at me. that those sour grapes

calling a “progressive government” born from the womb of electoral democracy “democracy intimidating”

No, the doctor forbade me to eat grapes a long time ago. Tongue sensory So it’s not distorted.

“Democracy threatens”, exactly.

It’s exactly the same as it actually is now. It’s not envy and looking for bullying.

because you guys are not in time, mobilize orange, get drunk, travel, intimidate-threaten The senator went all over the place.

“You must vote for Pita to become Prime Minister, up to 376 votes.”

Don’t just say Som Maya.

The bastards “Aj-Archan” are still out of nature. Go hunting for names to pressure The senators must vote in favor of Phitha as prime minister.

This is democracy Claiming – claiming that everyone “has the right – has one vote for each person equally”

Wandering around, pushing the senators to vote as the orange scum wants. Where is it democracy?

Democracy IO says

And this still spreads, reckless, and democratic down the road again.

Where are they?

Well, here it is. He announces the name – announcing the big bureau. Ko will die.

“Thammasat Alliance and Assembly”

He scheduled a rally on Tuesday, May 23, at 5:00 p.m. onwards. Let’s go together at “Sappaya Sapathan” Kiakkai

He said this……..

“Inviting the people of the people who are the owners of true sovereignty Let’s come together to confirm the principle that

Senators must not vote against the resolutions of the people.

and the victory of the people this time must not be destroyed by the voice of the Senate.”

This … like this, arguing that what you do is not “democratic intimidation”?

Because 23 May, the Senate from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. has an extraordinary meeting. to vote on 2-3 pending laws

the orange democracy So I’m going to show the det. Pressing – intimidating – threatening to make the senator afraid and then having to vote for Phitha

Embarrassing with the brand “Thammasat”!

How to teach students to Bong Tan until salao not knowing the law I don’t know the rules and procedures for becoming prime minister. and being a government at all

Is “John Lock” the owner of the theory of democracy related to “On Lock Yun”? I don’t know?

I know from “sitting inside” but……

The words “true sovereignty” that John Locke imagined from the “yoke” and “carrying shoulder”!

The “yoke” that uses “cow harness – buffalo harness” to plow the fields and carry baggage, that’s it.

John Locke was a social thinker. Saw a cow-buffalo artificial yoke Just pull the rope that cares about the boat. Crying hee hee hee hee .. it immediately dragged the plow away

The idea that emerged was….

“The herd must be herded The crowd must lead”!

use that concept Drafting the theory of democracy When using the word “yoke” doesn’t seem smooth.

in thinking Tagalog, so he smashed the word “Sovereignty…sovereignty” came up.

then explain that The yoke, or sovereignty, is “the supreme power of an independent state applicable to governing the country.”

That is, the “state” is the user of the yoke or sovereignty.

what the alliance of Thammasat said

“We are the real owners of sovereignty.” That’s it.

Confucius – owner of what and where?

It’s just a cow-a buffalo that “Som’s father” cares about the paddle, fake the yoke, shouts hee.. hee .. for Drag the plow to plow the real field.

I want to ask your “principles” that “Senators must not vote against the opinions of the people.” That’s it

From which section, which paragraph, which line of the constitution (wa)?

And what is a vote against people’s opinion?

The people’s vote that the orange population claimed was only 14 million votes among the 52 million votes that the Kao Klai Party was elected as 152 MPs.

Okay, no one’s arguing. Nobody cares There is only congratulations that 14 million votes have chosen to go far.

But another 38 million voices, he did not choose to go far. He scattered 348 other parties.

And think about it, 14 million who voted far ahead and 38 million who voted for other parties, which is the “people’s vote”?

You can just go far and get the most MPs, 152 people, and you gather your voice to form a government. No one interferes here.

As for choosing “who is the prime minister”, each member of parliament has the right to vote. The constitution even stated intimidation cannot be coerced Even people from the same party

and the constitution Who will be Prime Minister? That person must get more than half of the members of the House of Representatives, that is, 376 votes or more.

That’s all…….

I do not see any section Or where in the world is the constitution written forcing that Senator or member of the House of Representatives…..

“You must not vote against the people’s opinion”!?

If you do something stupid, adhere to this “people’s consensus”, that is, you must not vote to elect Phitha as Prime Minister. because it comes from a minority voice, only 14 million voices

38 million votes that do not choose the Kao Far Party, that’s “the people’s opinion”, do you understand? Som Naam!

The ancients said….

“Just stay still, kid. It’s good.” It was really like that.

Senator?

He let him come in to do the scrutiny. not to be “hand slap-foot slap” that keeps raising the tap-tap-tue

He must consider qualifications, maturity, look at policies for people to become Prime Minister. lead the country

Then Pita – a step forward show clear intentions

Overturn Section 112, choose the governor, issue a Mao Keng amnesty law The minimum wage is 450 baht.

Is it okay? Will the Senate put a seal of guarantee that Phitha will lead the nation to overthrow the institution like that?

Well…it’s as simple as this.

And do you still have to let me tell you for the hundredth time that

“Pita – a step forward”

It was a “death lantern egg” before it hatched!

end of the alley