—
–full screen –in this –EXPERT: Associate Professor Jonas Stein from the University of Tromsø.
1 of 2 Photo: Mortensen, Terje
–
– Has happened before
Professor Emeritus at Høgskolen i Innlandet, Jon Helge Lesjø, says that it is entirely possible to elect a party leader who does not sit in the Storting, but says it can present several challenges.
– Formally and actually, the answer is yes, and there are some historical examples where this has happened, but experience shows that without representatives in the Storting, the parties feel they are too enclosed in the organization, and therefore too little visible to the outside, he says.
It is admittedly not necessarily a requirement to be a parliamentary representative to be elected as party leader, says Lesjø.
He refers, among other things, to Erling Nordvik, who was leader of the Conservative Party between 1974–1980 and again from 1984–1986.
– For large periods, he was party chairman without sitting in the Storting, and it worked well. But he had a lot of political experience and knew many in the community.
Former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland (AP) has also been party leader without a seat in the Storting. Jagland was elected leader of the Labor Party in 1992, but did not become a parliamentary representative until 1993.
Another example is Kåre Kristiansen, who led KrF both between 1975–77 and 1979–83. When he was elected leader for the second time in 1979, there was no parliamentary seat. However, Kristiansen entered the Storting again in 1981.
Lesjø thus believes that both Hans Olav Syversen and Ida Lindtveit Røse can very well be elected as the new leader, if the party so wishes.
– Syvertsen is a veteran, and knows the party well. The ballast he has with him will come in handy. At the same time, he can be perceived as a vintage figure, who will sit for a relatively short time. Røse will thus be a natural choice as the future representative of the party, but building a new front figure will take time.
May be overshadowed
Nevertheless, Lesjø believes – like Stein – that a party leader without a seat in the Storting will risk feeling that they are not sufficiently involved in current politics . He also points to the challenge of having different party leaders and parliamentary leaders.
– It is often the leader of the parliamentary group who is perceived as the leader of the party. Thus, the parliamentary leader casts shadows over the party leader.
It will therefore be desirable for party leaders to get into the Storting as soon as possible, if they are not already there, Lesjø believes.
– If you do not have a seat in the Storting and the party in addition is not in government, you must be a very strong and mature person to succeed. It is a demanding job, and KrF needs a party leader who is both visible and spends time out in the organization, he says.
Hareide: – The leader should sit in the Storting
Minister of Transport and Communications and former KrF leader, Knut Arild Hareide, believes that the next leader should sit in the Storting. Hareide himself sat in the Storting when he was party leader for KrF between 2011 and 2019.
– The unique lectern provides opportunities to reach out widely. I experienced this as a significant strength when I myself was party leader, he said tenl Bergens Tidende.
Hareide will admittedly not set a parliamentary seat as an absolute requirement for a new party leader, the newspaper writes.
To VG, Hareide elaborates that the party must now be allowed to control its own process.
– We have several very talented candidates, with Olaug Bollestad and Dag Inge Ulstein at the helm. But now they must have time to make their own assessments, he says.
–
EXECUTIVE LEADER: Kjell Ingolf Ropstad, Knut Arild Hareide and Olaug Bollestad were in the lead during the harrowing road choice for KrF in 2018. Photo: Tore Kristiansen
Must get up again
This year, KrF had its worst election result since 1936, three years after the party was first established. Lesjø believes their biggest challenge will be to become a new nationwide party.
– This year’s election reaffirmed that KrF is a party for the southwestern country, which is otherwise very weak. They need to be rebuilt as an option for many people, not just a few.
– What do you think is the reason for their election result?
– There are probably several reasons for this, and the decline has taken place over time, but the liberal values have become so dominant today that it has become demanding for KrF to promote its more conservative view. On top of this came the question of whether they should lean to the right or left. The party failed to fully mobilize its voters.
– Will Ropstad’s resignation have a lot of impact on voters’ trust in the party?
– Now, first and foremost, Ropstad and his leadership fall, and he has taken the consequences of what has happened. But there is no doubt that the situation will make things extra demanding for KrF in the future.
–