In the Wolves vs. Arsenal game, David Luiz was accused of infringing on home team forward William Jose and sentenced to 12 yards + direct red card appearance (so-called full meal). I saw a lot of fans discussing the lack of knowledge of the ball, so I could not help thinking. Answer the words.
By the way, on the night of Manchester United’s 9-0 victory over Xiu Xianton, Bednarek was also fined for a full meal for very similar reasons. Of course, it was ignored. At that time, Manchester United had already won six goals, “only” Xiu Xian. After two fewer shots, the defense collapsed and three more goals were scored.
First of all, it’s about “DOGSO”Ball casesLet’s talk first:
“When a player violates the rules in his team’s penalty area to prevent the opponent’s player from having an obvious chance of scoring, and the ball card has been given a penalty of 12 yards, if the offender intends to try to play, he will be given a yellow card warning; in any other situation (such as catching , Pull, push, no chance to play, etc.), the offender must be expelled from the field.”
QuoteWhere a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off.
DOGSO is written in English as Denying Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity. When a player is judged to prevent an obvious chance of scoring a goal by a foul, he should be penalized. David Luiz should have a full meal, there are mainly three keywords:
1.[Illegal Behavior]Talk about patience, is there any foul first? As mentioned in another paragraph of the ball rule, any kind of contact has a chance to constitute a foul. The contact must first be there. Even if Arteta’s words are not seen ten times, it’s because David Luiz said “Hi here”. They were all out of balance and fell to the ground. If you have William Jose himself, you will have a reason to say that if you doubt that the next channel is inserted into the water, David Luiz himself will lose a copy. In fact, it is hard to deny. And once there is contact, to be honest, if this collision occurs outside the penalty area, everyone will agree that the next foul is.
2.[Obvious chance of scoring]Do you want to explain it down…?
3.[The offender intends to play the ball]This is a jade. Hey, anyone with a discerning eye can see that, whether David Luiz or Bednarek, they didn’t try to intercept them. It was a very unfortunate “kick pro” incident, and many fans were because of his ” Unintentional loss” and thought that the ball should not be judged bit by bit.
However, the ball rule just states,“As long as you don’t want to intercept a wave, you have to eat the whole meal.”。
Yeah, it’s ridiculous: if you shovel the ball down hard, as long as you don’t reach the bottom of the hill (that is, you will fix the red card for two minutes in Hamton), and it will look like “de-wave”. Department of yellow card. unintended mistake? Accidental kick fell? Sorry, the ball rule states, in short, it is not a foul to intercept Xiang Bo, just a red card + 12 yards, see you after three games.
The verdict is 100% correct. David Luiz and Bednarek are unlucky. As a rule of thumb, it is absolutely unreasonable to use “unlucky” to make a judgment to reverse the fate of the team.
According to reports, Arsenal fellow initiate Xhamton has already appealed the red card. According to the current ball rule, the ball is completely correct and the appeal is unlikely to win. However, I personally believe that similar situations occurred in the two games on the same night, and it directly caused the first team’s wave situation to change from prosperity to decline, and finally lose the field wave, and the team must have a certain degree of attention. The game will have the opportunity to amend the rules, or Interpretation forms to avoid similar situations from happening again.
It is also not the first time that they have done this. After Manchester City’s 1-0 win over Villa, the Premier League has also overstepped the amendment to prevent the benefit of the offside player from intercepting the defender.
***
Please support Shi Gou to say football Facebook / MeWe pages!
– .
