Ateneo Publication Faces Backlash Amidst Duterte’s ICC Charges, Sparking debate in Davao City
Table of Contents
- Ateneo Publication Faces Backlash Amidst Duterte’s ICC Charges, Sparking debate in Davao City
- Duterte’s Divided Legacy: Analyzing the Davao City Rallies & ICC Charges
- Duterte Supporters Rally in Davao City, Demand Return Amid ICC Charges
- Divided Legacy: Expert Q&A on Duterte,ICC Charges,and the Fight for Justice in the Philippines
DAVAO CITY, Philippines – The Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) finds itself at the center of a heated debate surrounding Rodrigo duterte’s legacy and the pursuit of justice for victims of the war on drugs. The Atenews, ADDU’s student publication, faced social media backlash after publishing a statement from the Ateneo Publications Alliance supporting justice for extrajudicial killing (EJK) victims and their families. This incident underscores the deep divisions within Philippine society as the International Criminal Court (ICC) proceeds wiht its examination into Duterte’s anti-drug campaign.
The Ateneo Publications Alliance, comprising student publications from Ateneo universities across the Philippines, asserted that “impunity, whatever form it may take, must not go unpunished.” The alliance further stated, “In memory of all those who fell victim too fascist violence of the Duterte regime, we stand with the families and communities that continue to bear the scars — pressing forward until justice is served.” The alliance emphasized that Duterte’s arrest represents a step toward holding his management accountable for “the tens of thousands of human rights violations and vicious killings through the war on drugs.”
Fr. Karel S. San Juan, Sr., Ateneo de Davao University president, defended student press freedom while condemning the harassment of the student publication. “While we encourage critical thinking and fearless journalism, we do not condone bullying, harassment, or red-tagging—especially when directed at our students,” San Juan stated. “These actions have no place in a community dedicated to truth, justice, and intellectual integrity.” San Juan affirmed the university’s commitment to defending “the right to a free and safe press,” highlighting the role of student journalism in fostering informed discourse and combating injustice. He clarified that student publications maintain editorial independence and their opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of the university.
“Tough conversations unsettle us, but they ignite growth, sharpen understanding, and demand that we confront today’s complex realities,” San Juan said. “Yet, we remain steadfast in our mission—to form leaders who think critically, question boldly, and serve with compassion.”
Meanwhile, calls for justice for EJK victims continue to resonate. Cobbie Jan Canda of Kabataan partylist Southern Mindanao demanded accountability for those responsible for Duterte’s war on drugs. “The war on drugs is a war against the poor, not a war against the prevalence of illegal drugs in the country; a campaign masqueraded as quelling drug lords, addicts, and pushers, but in reality all he did was tyrannical abuse of his executive powers,” Canda said. Canda emphasized that victims of Duterte’s anti-drug operations were denied due process and that Duterte’s case shoudl serve as a lesson to all human rights violators.”This might be a victory, but this is only the beginning. We, as the youth, must strengthen and expand our base and continue to call for justice and accountability,” he added.
Dr. Jean Lindo,chair of Gabriela Southern Mindanao,stated that Duterte’s arrest is a consequence of state-sponsored killings and violations of constitutional rights. “I guess he will be accorded with respect and dignity in the ICC court. At least there is due process of law. He has lawyers to defend him.The victims of drug killings never had anybody. there was a diligent fact-finding process from relevant agencies and it is indeed up to him to own up or not,” Lindo said.
The events in Davao City reflect the ongoing debate surrounding Rodrigo Duterte’s legacy and the pursuit of justice for victims of the war on drugs. As the ICC proceedings unfold, the Philippines remains deeply divided on these critical issues.
Duterte’s Divided Legacy: Analyzing the Davao City Rallies & ICC Charges
DAVAO CITY, Philippines – The recent pro-Duterte rallies in Davao City, coinciding with his ICC charges, present a complex picture of a nation deeply divided. Dr. Ramirez, a political analyst, sheds light on the core issues driving this division, spanning past context, perceptions of leadership, and the impact of policy decisions.
“Filipinos are deeply divided on former President duterte’s legacy, mainly due to his controversial ‘war on drugs,'” Dr. Ramirez explains. “For many, Duterte represented a strong hand against crime, promising peace and order—a promise some believe he delivered. However, this came at the cost of human rights, as alleged extrajudicial killings occurred during his administration.”
Duterte’s supporters frequently prioritize perceived gains in public safety over due process,framing the ICC charges as politically motivated. Conversely, critics see this as a reckoning for alleged state-sponsored violence, emphasizing the denial of justice for victims and upholding the rule of law.
The conflicting narratives revolve around two key aspects: the scope of the problem and the justification of the methods. Supporters often minimize the scale of the killings while demonizing victims as criminals or drug addicts, claiming that they were not innocent.They view the “war on drugs” as a necessary evil to protect society. Conversely, critics highlight that due process was not afforded to the victims and that alleged extrajudicial killings violated basic human rights. This stark contrast in viewpoints is further exacerbated by the media landscape, leading to differing realities and a lack of common ground to have a productive discussion.
the “Solidarity Walk” in Davao City seems to reflect considerable support for Duterte. Several factors sustain this support, even amidst ICC charges. Some believe that Duterte brought about the “good old days” and that the situation has worsened since he left office. Duterte’s straightforward and populist style resonates with many Filipinos.They perceive him as a leader who understands their frustrations. There is a widespread distrust of established institutions and the media, leading some to believe that Duterte is being unfairly targeted. Davao City has been Duterte’s political base for many years. Regional ties and loyalty play a part in the sustained support.Moreover, the fact that the current Marcos governance is considered as an adversary by some of Duterte’s supporters adds to the public support of the former president.
The backlash against the Atenews highlights the state of freedom of expression and the sensitivity of the political climate. The swift social media response demonstrates the sharp divide on Duterte’s legacy. Criticism of the former president is frequently enough met with aggressive opposition. Those critical of the ex-president face significant pushback. This can lead to self-censorship, as individuals and institutions attempt to avoid conflict or attack. The strong defence of student press freedom, and freedom of expression, by the university is vital in countering the pressure and safeguarding open discourse. Young people play a crucial role in the country’s political future. It is indeed significant for them to address tough issues, and call for justice.
The ICC charges represent a significant case for several reasons. If the ICC proceedings lead to a trial and conviction, it could set a precedent for accountability in the Philippines and worldwide. The case puts a spotlight on human rights in the Philippines, affecting its position in the international community, and its relationships to its international counterparts. Whatever the verdict, the ICC case will remain a focal point of political discussion. It can impact the political landscape and possibly affect future elections. The outcome of the proceedings could foster reconciliation, but also deepen divisions among the people.
The debate surrounding Duterte’s legacy will have long-term effects that might be profound and lasting.Such deeply divided opinions and the polarization that they create will impede social cohesion and can create unrest. If free and open public discourse about the role of government and human rights is restricted, this prevents healthy democratic evolution. The political climate will affect policy-making, especially regarding social justice, the rule of law, and human rights.
The events unfolding in Davao City underscore the enduring impact of Duterte, emphasizing the complex issues that continue to divide the Philippines. The ICC charges, and the strong reactions to them, keep Duterte’s legacy at the forefront, with lasting consequences for the country’s political, social, and legal landscape.
Dr. Ramirez concludes,”Engage in critical thinking,analyze diverse perspectives,and demand that leaders act in accordance with the law and human rights. This is critically crucial for a healthy society.”
Duterte Supporters Rally in Davao City, Demand Return Amid ICC Charges
DAVAO CITY (March 16) — Thousands of supporters of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte marched through Davao City on sunday, calling for his return from the Hague, Netherlands, where he faces charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged crimes against humanity. The “Solidarity Walk,” held during the Parada Dabawenyo, saw an estimated 20,000 participants, according to the Davao City Police Office (DCPO), as the former president’s loyalists voiced their unwavering support.
The rally underscores the deep divisions within the Philippines regarding Duterte’s legacy, especially concerning his controversial war on drugs. While international bodies and human rights organizations scrutinize his actions, many Filipinos continue to view him as a strong leader who brought peace and order to the nation.
“Solidarity walk” Draws Thousands
Mars Flores,a virtual assistant who participated in the “solidarity Walk,” expressed her affection for the former president. “Love man gyud nato si PRRD (We love former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte). We want the President back,” Flores said, adding that she believes Duterte was deprived of due process.
The march commenced on Roxas Avenue, proceeding through key city streets before concluding on san Pedro Street. The Davao city Police Office (DCPO), through spokesperson Capt. Hazel Tuazon,estimated the crowd size at approximately 20,000.
In the days following Duterte’s arrest on March 11, motorists were seen driving around Davao City displaying Philippine flags and pro-Duterte banners, further demonstrating the groundswell of support for the former leader.
ICC Charges and proceedings
The ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber I issued a statement on March 12, asserting that there are reasonable grounds to believe Duterte, along with others, conspired “to kill individuals they identified as suspected criminals or persons having criminal propensities, including but not limited to drug offenders, initially in Davao and subsequently throughout the country.”
The chamber’s findings allege an attack directed against a civilian population under an organizational policy during Duterte’s tenure as head of the davao Death Squad (DDS), and under a State policy during his presidency.
Duterte made his initial appearance before the ICC on March 14, with the confirmation of charges hearing scheduled for September 23 of this year. He was arrested on March 11 upon arrival at Ninoy Aquino International Airport from Hong Kong, detained at Villamor Airbase, and subsequently transported out of the Philippines.
Reactions and Accusations
Flores suggested that the current Marcos governance played a role in Duterte’s arrest, urging critics to focus on the “good things” Duterte accomplished during his time in office.
Kring Asidor, from Iligan City, echoed these sentiments, calling the Marcos administration “unfair” to Duterte.Asidor stated that the improved peace and order situation in Davao City prompted her family to relocate there in 2011. “To think, dili man to mga inosente (they were not innocent),” Asidor said, referring to the victims of alleged extrajudicial killings (EJKs), claiming they were drug addicts and suspects in rape or murder cases.
Asidor expressed her sadness,stating,”I’m so sad.I want to cry. I know how strong Duterte is, how resilient he is, but to think that he’s at his age makes me sad. He’s just like our father. We don’t know what will happen to him.”
Student Publication Faces Backlash
The atenews, the student publication of Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU), faced social media backlash after publishing a statement from the Ateneo Publications alliance supporting justice for EJK victims and their families.
The alliance, comprising student publications from Ateneo universities across the Philippines, asserted that “impunity, whatever form it may take, must not go unpunished. In memory of all those who fell victim to fascist violence of the Duterte regime, we stand with the families and communities that continue to bear the scars — pressing forward until justice is served.”
The alliance emphasized that duterte’s arrest represents a step toward holding his administration accountable for “the tens of thousands of human rights violations and vicious killings through the war on drugs.”
Fr.Karel S. San Juan, Sr., Ateneo de Davao University president, defended student press freedom while condemning the harassment of the student publication. “While we encourage critical thinking and fearless journalism, we do not condone bullying, harassment, or red-tagging—especially when directed at our students,” San Juan stated.”These actions have no place in a community dedicated to truth, justice, and intellectual integrity.”
San Juan affirmed the university’s commitment to defending “the right to a free and safe press,” highlighting the role of student journalism in fostering informed discourse and combating injustice. He clarified that student publications maintain editorial independence and their opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of the university.
Difficult conversations unsettle us, but they ignite growth, sharpen understanding, and demand that we confront today’s complex realities. Yet, we remain steadfast in our mission—to form leaders who think critically, question boldly, and serve with compassion.
Calls for Justice
Cobbie Jan Canda of kabataan partylist Southern Mindanao demanded justice for all EJK victims and accountability for those responsible for Duterte’s war on drugs.”The war on drugs is a war against the poor, not a war against the prevalence of illegal drugs in the country; a campaign masqueraded as quelling drug lords, addicts, and pushers, but in reality all he did was tyrannical abuse of his executive powers,” Canda said.
Canda emphasized that victims of Duterte’s anti-drug operations were denied due process and that Duterte’s case should serve as a lesson to all human rights violators. “This might be a victory, but this is only the beginning. We, as the youth, must strengthen and expand our base and continue to call for justice and accountability,” he added.
Dr. Jean Lindo, chair of Gabriela Southern mindanao, stated that Duterte’s arrest is a consequence of state-sponsored killings and violations of constitutional rights. “I guess he will be accorded with respect and dignity in the ICC court. At least there is due process of law. He has lawyers to defend him. The victims of drug killings never had anybody. There was a diligent fact-finding process from relevant agencies and it is indeed up to him to own up or not,” Lindo said.
duterte’s Divided legacy: Analyzing the Davao City Rallies & ICC Charges
The events unfolding in Davao city underscore the enduring impact of Duterte, emphasizing the complex issues that continue to divide the Philippines. The ICC charges, and the strong reactions to them, keep Duterte’s legacy at the forefront, with lasting consequences for the country’s political, social, and legal landscape.
Dr. Ramirez’s Final Thoughts: Engage in critical thinking, analyze diverse perspectives, and demand that leaders act in accordance with the law and human rights. This is critically critically important for a healthy society.
Divided Legacy: Expert Q&A on Duterte,ICC Charges,and the Fight for Justice in the Philippines
World Today News (WTN): Dr. Ramirez, thank you for joining us. We’re seeing amazing tension in Davao City and across the Philippines following the ICC charges against former President Duterte and the strong reactions they’ve sparked. Is it more accurate to say thes events are merely exposing existing societal fault lines, or are they actively creating new ones?
Dr.Ramirez: its crucial to understand that the ICC charges and the attendant debates are indeed magnifying existing fault lines in Philippine society rather than creating entirely new ones.These divisions—particularly centered on Duterte’s war on drugs and its controversial methods—have been simmering for years. The ICC case has brought these issues front and center, forcing Filipinos to re-evaluate their positions and beliefs, making the divide more visible and, in some instances, more entrenched. The intensity of the discussions, the rallies in support of Duterte, and the backlash against those seeking justice for victims of the war on drugs are all manifestations of these pre-existing fissures.
WTN: The Ateneo publications alliance statement, supporting justice for EJK victims, has been met with significant opposition and backlash, highlighting a profound ideological split. In your view, what does this incident reveal about the state of free speech and the importance of critical discourse in the Philippines today?
Dr. Ramirez: The backlash against the Ateneo publications alliance underscores the precarious state of free speech and critical discourse in the Philippines, particularly when it comes to sensitive topics like the Duterte administration’s policies.the very fact that expressing support for justice and human rights can provoke harassment and red-tagging reveals a climate where dissenting voices are often silenced through intimidation.
This incident exposes several critical issues:
The vulnerability of student journalists and publications.
The chilling effect this can have on others who may have opposing opinions, especially when those differing viewpoints challenge popular or widely held beliefs.
The essential role that academic institutions like Ateneo must play in defending press freedom and fostering environments where diverse perspectives can be safely expressed.
WTN: The article mentions Dr. Jean Lindo’s statement concerning the victims’ lack of due process during Duterte’s war on drugs.Looking at it from a legal and human rights viewpoint, what are the most significant implications of the ICC’s involvement in this case?
Dr. Ramirez: From a legal and human rights perspective, the ICC’s involvement signifies a critical moment for accountability.The ICC’s investigation and potential trial could set a precedent. The allegations against Duterte involve serious crimes against humanity, specifically the extrajudicial killings and the attack on a civilian population.
The ICC’s involvement has several key implications:
Accountability: The ICC’s intervention offers a potential avenue for justice for the victims and their families, by providing a forum where evidence can be presented and examined independently.
Rule of Law: It reinforces the principle of the rule of law, signalling that even heads of state are not above international legal standards. The case serves to deter future human rights violations and gives the possibility to review the anti-drug campaign’s legitimacy.
International Reputation: The ICC case is a point of international reference and has the potential to impact the Philippines’ international reputation and, therefore, its relationships within organizations and trade partners. This can indirectly lead to policy changes.
WTN: The actions of the Ateneo de Davao University president, Fr. Karel S. San Juan, have been hailed, and his statement about the importance of fostering open dialog, even when discussing challenging topics, is key. How can educational institutions and other societal actors play a more active role in promoting these values?
Dr. Ramirez: Educational institutions, civil society organizations, and community leaders must actively work to promote critical thinking, open dialogue, and human rights.
Educational institutions
Should integrate human rights education into the curriculum.
Encourage students to analyze diverse cultural backgrounds and historical perspectives.
Create safe spaces for debate, allowing students to discuss controversial topics without fear of retribution.
Strongly support media literacy programs to help them critically assess facts and identify disinformation.
Civil society organizations
Play an essential role by carrying out fact-finding missions and making sure justice is served.
Offer support to victims.
Organize workshops and dialogues to promote understanding.
Advocate for policy changes that safeguard human rights and protect freedom of expression.
Community Leaders
Should actively promote human rights and stand up against injustices.
WTN: As we look ahead, what long-term consequences do you foresee if society remains deeply divided on Duterte’s legacy? Are reconciliation and healing still possible?
Dr. Ramirez: Deep societal divisions can have severe long-term consequences, impeding social cohesion and hindering progress. If dialogue and reconciliation are not prioritized,we might expect to see more political polarization,social unrest,and weakened democratic institutions. Though, reconciliation and healing remain possible, and they are essential for the Philippines’ future.
Here are some steps to start the healing:
Truth and Reconciliation: There must be a mechanism to acknowledge the truth about past wrongdoings but more importantly, offer avenues for victims to address their traumas.
Justice: Ensure that those responsible for human rights violations face justice to show accountability and deter future abuses.
Dialogue and Education: Promote education and have public discussions on human rights. This will create a shared understanding.
* Address Systemic Issues: Recognize and address the root causes of social issues like poverty and inequality.
WTN: Dr. Ramirez, thank you for providing such insightful and valuable perspectives.
Dr. Ramirez: My pleasure.
