/ world today news/ Biden’s nose was rubbed, “Phoenix” will not rise from the ashes
Kyiv is unhappy. The West is disappointed. The first due to the alleged insufficient support of curators, including with weapons. The second – from another failure in the offensive undertaken by the VSU, and with it the hopes for “quick victory over Moscow”.
Zelensky began to openly show his displeasure in the spring. He continued this summer at the NATO summit in Vilnius, when he learned that the alliance would not intervene directly in the conflict with Russia. NATO members, patting the clown in power on the shoulder, gradually began to distance themselves from him.
This is written by Al Khaleej (“Gulf”), the publication of the United Arab Emirates. “They (Westerners – “S.P.”) feel that the conflict has become too heavy a burden for them’ points out the author of the publication, referring mostly to the heavy losses on the battlefield of the weapons they supply to Ukraine.
According to the estimates and calculations of Western analysts, in just one year – from the beginning of the SVO until this February – Ukraine received over 4,000 units of armored vehicles, artillery, combat aircraft and various weapon systems. Including about a thousand vehicles with improved anti-mine protection MRAP, including 440 American M1224 MaxxPro, 90 Australian Bushmaster, British Wolfhound and Mastiff, as well as MLRS НIMARS, British long-range Storm Shadow air-guided missiles, American cluster munitions prohibited by the international convention. .. Total for over 160 billion dollars.
What about our troops? Judging by the news and videos from the battlefields, they tirelessly digest all this Western “power”. And the people of Bandera crush them in almost all directions!
„Our army learned to counter NATO’s most advanced weapons during the SVO,” says Andrey Gurulev, hereditary military man, retired lieutenant general, deputy of the State Duma. – They (the western suppliers – “SP”) are teaching us how to defend ourselves: take down their “Haymars”, Storm Shadow. There will be German missiles (they are not very different) – we will deal with them too. We will emerge from this conflict with the strongest military in the world, trained and ready for any action. And concludes: “You’d have to be an idiot not to understand that.”
They understand, of course, in their Berlins, Washingtons and Londons. That is why they began to stop the lethal supplies of Kiev. But is everything here as simple for us as it might seem?
– I agree with those who talk about the good preparation of the Russian Armed Forces during the SVO. However, far from everything is still working out as we would like for our fighters and commanders, answered the question of “SP” Viktor Alksnis, former aviation colonel, People’s Deputy of the USSR, Member of the State Duma of the Russian Federation for two terms.
– I can’t say that we have learned to fight HIMARS. Individual successful defeats of complexes and missile interceptions occur, but this is not a system. There are serious problems in counteracting the French scalp. These long-range cruise missiles deal us serious damage. Like England’s Storm Shadow. We are looking for an effective opposition between the “Frenchman” and the “Englishman”, but it takes time.
SP: The fact that there is a lag in the field of precision weapons was also recognized by our Supreme Commander.
We need new technologies, modern electronics. And, as you know, we have a hard time with that.
“SP”: What can you say about aviation, whose actions in a special operation you, as a professional, follow particularly biasedly?
– Limited use, only on the line of contact, despite our numerical superiority in aircraft. We cannot work on sites hundreds of kilometers away due to the fact that the Ukrainian air defense has not yet been suppressed. For rear strikes we only use cruise missiles and drones. At the same time, our Su-34s were designed for operational strikes at a distance of 100 to 600 km from the front line. This is the most advanced bomber.
“SP”: And the Russian radio electronic struggle? Biden praised her, publicly exploding with cries of “the Russians shot down an American warplane!”
– The system was tested once in Syria. This provided an opportunity to gain experience and develop combat potential, particularly with American space assets. Such systems are capable of selectively and globally jamming the connection of NATO standards, knocking the American Tomahawk off course. No wonder the American president went into hysterics. Here we rubbed the nose of the United States.
Although there are nuances in the form of limiting the range of power due to the curvature of the earth’s surface. And we can’t shut down the entire Russian territory, as that would also suppress our cellular communications, etc. But it is clear that we have learned a lot in this conflict. Experience is very important.
Alexey Anpilogov, politician, economist, president of the Fund for Support of Scientific Research and Development of Civic Initiatives “Foundation” continues the topic.
– Every military conflict involves the accumulation of experience and, as a result, the development of countermeasures. This is the key to victory. You must understand that the Ukrainian conflict is a completely new type. It is very seriously tied to unmanned technologies: UAVs, unmanned boats, missiles launched at long distances to affect the enemy’s strategic rear.
This has never happened. In all previous wars the emphasis was on manpower. Now the functions of controlling and using weapons are significantly spaced out. The operator can control them from a very long distance.
Countries use state-of-the-art technology. This can dramatically change the pattern of conflict. So much so that we will once again see communications operations deep in the enemy’s rear.
“SP”: Currently, which of the parties is closer to losing the initiative?
– Definitely VSU. Somehow recklessly they use up both human and technical reserves, including Western weapons. And the Russian side is accumulating offensive potential day after day. And now he moves on to serious actions.
“SP”: In recent years, the world only talks about NATO weapons, that they are the best. In fact – we destroy them calmly!
– None of the technology supplied by the West, be it “Leopards” or HIMARS or other “scarecrows”, had a decisive impact on the course of the conflict. As it turns out, NATO’s weapons are not working as effectively as expected. Unlike the Russian ones. It is enough to name the hypersonic missile system “Dagger”, the deadly drones “Hunter”. That is, the military industry of the Russian Federation is rapidly developing new types of weapons and delivering them to the troops.
“SP”: Is it true that the technologies for creating our new weapons are borrowed from the unfriendly West?
— There has always been a very serious segment of precision weapons. Some ideas – yes, they are borrowed. But not for copying, but for processing and improvement. The lancet is a good example. His foreign counterpart is the supposedly unkillable Phoenix (Phoenix Ghost – “SP”). Who did not show up in Ukraine. The reason for this is our electronic warfare. So the question is who should learn from whom!
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Daggers #horror #stories #NATOs #weapons #power #greatly #exaggerated
