Criticism of Chelsea: “Why do they sign worse players than they already have?”

Chelsea broke all records in the last winter market to try to rejoin the Premier and compete in the Champions League. So far, neither one thing nor the other, and with the passing of the days it is increasingly difficult for them to be in the next Champions League. The new additions do not finish settling and in England they point to the coach, Potter, but also They begin to look at the management of said signings and if they really are better than what they already had.

The former Arsenal player, Paul Merson, in statements for Sky Sport, assures that Chelsea has rushed into the signings: “Why are you buying a bunch of players that are no better than the ones you already have? None of them is improving the level of the team except Enzo Fernández and Badiashile. You can’t tell me that Noni Madueke is a better player than Raheem Sterling or Christian Pulisic” he assured.

Merson, in addition, is very critical of the money that the signing of Mudryk cost, in relation to what he is demonstrating about the green: “They brought in Mykhailo Mudryk for 100 million and, except for a 20-minute cameo, he hasn’t shown anything. For that price, you shouldn’t need time to adapt.”

Everyone points out that Potter is Chelsea’s main problem, but the former player comes out to defend the coach: “People think that Potter is not the right man for the job.but I think it is. For me, I think you have to give it time. With these players you can’t change the dynamics of Chelsea too quickly,” Merson concluded.