Home » today » News » Coronavirus origin: – Virologist: – Should have been prioritized

Coronavirus origin: – Virologist: – Should have been prioritized

USAs president Joe Biden ordered a new investigation last week to get to the bottom of how the coronavirus originated.

The president ordered the intelligence services to present a report on the case within three months in hopes of clarifying the origin of the virus.

It is still believed that the Huanan sea market, located in the epicenter of Wuhan in China, plays a key role in the outbreak of the coronavirus.

The market, where wild animals were sold, was the place where the very first corona patients were infected.

However, it is still very uncertain whether the pandemic started on the market, and the WHO has said that they are still working from several possible theories about the origin of the virus.

– Should have been prioritized

WARNING: WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus emphasizes that the coronavirus can still be controlled and warns against giving up the fight. Video: WHO
view more

Virologist Eddie Holmes at the University of Sydney is among those behind President Biden.

He demands increased efforts to find the origin of the virus, and believes the World Health Organization (WHO) must look at which animals were on the market at the end of 2019 to get to the bottom of the mystery.

“As wildlife poses the greatest risk, this should have been a priority in the WHO’s market investigation,” Holmes said. The Guardian.

The maritime market has been closed since the beginning of 2020, but WHO experts visited the market during their visit to Wuhan this year.

In January, a group of WHO experts traveled to the Wuhan epicenter to find the origin of the coronavirus.

– Must be interviewed again

PARTY MOOD: Life has returned to normal for most people in Wuhan. Video: Weibo / Twitter. Photo: Tingshu Wang / Reuters / NTB
view more

According to The Guardian, however, a report shows that WHO researchers interviewed only two of Huanan Sea Market’s homeowners during their visit, and that none of those interviewed were involved in the pet trade.

Virologist Holmes is an expert on the evolution and emergence of infectious diseases, and is now calling for the bode owners who were involved in the pet trade in 2019 to be interviewed.

He believes this will be of great importance in the hunt for the virus’ origin.

– However, I am not sure who controlled the WHO’s schedule, so it may have been out of their control. At the very least, these booth owners must be interviewed again in the further investigation of the virus’ origin, he tells the newspaper.

– Complete delivery

Holmes believes the most important thing is to find out which animals were on the market between August and December in 2019.

– There must be complete disclosure of this information. Once these animals are identified, where the animals came from – farms, traders and even those who lived wild must be tracked, and all animals must be tested using a number of different approaches, says the professor.

The Guardian has not been able to get a comment from those who own the sea market or any of the estate owners.

MEET THE PRESS: US President Donald Trump claims he has evidence that the coronavirus originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. Video: NTB Scanpix
view more

WHO has also not responded to whether they tried to interview more homeowners in the market or not.

Wuhan visit

One of the WHO experts who was in Wuhan, Peter Daszak, has previously stated the following about the trip:

– We talked to people who collected samples from the market floor, and who later tested positive. It’s the kind of information we get from a person who really plays a role.

After President Biden ordered a new investigation, the theory that the virus may have originated from a laboratory in Wuhan has been given new air under its wings.

Takes bones: Note the word “Wuhan Shake”. It’s the new viral trend on how to greet other people without being infected by Corona. Video: Change Vellene / Dagbladet
view more

The theory was revived after the Wall Street Journal quoted a US intelligence report claiming that three employees of the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalized in November 2019, a month before the first cases of covid-19 were detected. Avisa wondered if these three could have fallen ill with the virus a month before the first reported cases.

A spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry called the information “totally untrue”.

The answer to the Wuhan riddle has enormous implications for China, which claims they are not responsible for the pandemic.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.