English Premier League season 2024-25, week 8, a story that has been a problem for football fans to watch. There will inevitably be fouls of a similar nature but with different penalties between two defenders, William Saliba (Arsenal) and Tosin Adarabioyo (Chelsea C), who are both in the same final position .
William Saliba’s yellow card was canceled by VAR and he was given a red card instead. After using his arm to pull Bournemouth forward Evanilson in midfield in the first half he was ruled to have clearly denied a goal scoring opportunity, but for Tosin Adarabioyo, he only got yellow card. Even though it was almost the same against Diogo Jota,
However, after the end of the game, Chelsea lost 1-2 to Liverpool, many footballers came out saying that the decision in both cases was correct, with Manchester United legend Gary Neville appearing the following. “What is different from Arsenal’s case with William Saliba yesterday is that there are defenders around Tosin Adarabioyo.”
While former referee Mike Dean said: “At that time, Tosin Adarabioyo had very strange body language and Levi Colville was close when the ball flowed … there were a lot of doubts. The football also traveled to the assistant referee.”
“To me the case of Tosin Adarabioyo is completely different. This is the right decision. Unlike the case of William Saliba, it was due to the loss of Leandro Trossar back and it made him separated from the defense … while Tosin Adarabioyo was still supported by his teammates. , the football comes from a long rain. “
However, former Premier League referee Mark Halsey expressed a different opinion from the two experts. He believes that William Saliba’s punishment is too severe. “I have serious doubts about William Saliba’s red card and I will be responsible for the first yellow card given by the referee on the field Rob Jones.
“Arsenal defender William Saliba tackles Bournemouth striker Evanilson, but was VAR intervention a mistake?” It is a subjective decision for each person. So I don’t think Jarred Gillett’s VAR needs to be involved.”
“To deny a chance to score We will consider four main criteria. And I have doubts about three of these four points: the distance between the attackers and the goal is rather small, the general direction of the game means that the ball goes past Evanilson and not in front of him . The location and number of defenders is also questionable. “
“But the opportunity for Evanilson to collect or control the ball may have worked in the Cherries striker’s favour, as David Raya was heading back towards his own goal.
Considering the current version of the LAWS OF THE GAME, it goes into the rules of Obvious Goal Obstruction or DOGSO (Denial of an Obvious Goal Scoring Opportunity) 4 items are considered near:
1. Direct a play that has a chance to be a goal (DIRECTION)
2. Distance between attackers in front of the door (Distance / GOAL)
3. The distance between the offensive side and the defensive side that has the opportunity to reach the ball / control the ball after this moment (DISTANCE TO THE BALL)
4. Defensive team players in that area (NUMBER OF THE COUNTRY)
If the referee believes that the defender’s actions clearly interfere with the goal, all 4 points can be considered as a straight red card. But if it doesn’t meet all 4 criteria, in most cases it won’t fall into DOGSO (Denial of Goal Scoring Opportunity).
Finally, we hope that any errors or doubts in decisions by the beloved team of everyone will happen as little as possible. Because it currently turns out to be everyone else’s situation. Any team that has a toxic referee will attack the opposing team’s fans. But there is no clear standard to support it.
2024-10-21 10:46:00
#Contrasting #views #Saliba #red #carded #Tosin #yellow #card #standings
