In the 12th week of the Super League, Galatasaray was the guest of Atakaş Hatayspor. The match played in Mersin ended with Hatayspor leading 2-1. Referee commentators evaluated the controversial positions in the match played between Hatayspor and Galatasaray.
Is the referee’s decision correct in the goal Hatayspor scored with Rivas in the 13th minute?
Bahattin Duran: Number 3 player Davinson is in close proximity to Sanchez but does not challenge for the ball. Davinson Sanchez came out and hit the ball easily. He played with control and purpose. In this position, the assistant referee simply raised his flag at the right time. There is no offside in this position.
Bulent Yildirim: The last pass is not offside anyway. The only player who can compete with the opponent for the ball is number 3. Numbers 1 and 2 are not involved at all. The assistant referee either confused the player or was confused. I guess he thought player number 3 was offside. VAR showed with a single line that there was no offside in the last stage. He was far behind his opponent. He drew the offside line from number 3. Because the assistant referee thought that this player was offside. Outsiders wonder why they didn’t withdraw from 1 and 2, but they are not involved at all. It’s only number 3 that interests us.
Sea Shepherd: There is no offside. There is absolutely no offside.
Was the referee’s decision to continue in the 81st minute, where Barış Alper Yılmaz fell down in the penalty area, correct?
Sea Shepherd: Is there hand-to-face contact? While falling, the player from Hatayspor slips and loses his balance. As Barış Alper moves towards the ball, the face connects with the hand. This is an accident during a normal fight. Even if it is beyond, there is a very small contact. This happens unintentionally during the fight between the two players. The decision to continue is correct.
Bulent Yildirim: Both players are looking at the ball, taking positions to move up. Both players have normal hands and arms. The decision to continue is correct.
Bahattin Duran: If Rivas had made any contact, such as opening his hands and hitting his face, even to take a position, we would have different conversations. The Hatayspor player’s focus is entirely on the ball, when he presses the ground with both feet at the same time, his foot slips and there is an involuntary contact. There will be contact in football. It is not a violation that would warrant a penalty.
Fırat Aydınus: The football player looks at the ball as it comes. The football player from Hatayspor slips at the last moment. He is avoiding a collision. At that moment there is a contact of the hand. This contact is not an intervention that would require a penalty. The decision to continue is correct.
Was the referee’s decision to continue in the 81st minute, where Barış Alper Yılmaz fell down in the penalty area, correct?
Erman Toroğlu: There’s nothing here, for God’s sake. I can hit you, kick you, spit on you. I won’t foul your head with my head. Hatay people are looking at the ball, they are not looking at each other at all. It has nothing to do with the penalty.
90+6. Could a penalty have been awarded for the position where Icardi was down in the minute?
Bulent Yildirim: This is a clear television penalty. Let me tell you shortly. Why? It’s not a bash in carom. Whose foot lands where, accidental stepping in the carom is not a matter of contact. Even though the player knows where his opponent is, he takes the risk and pretends to rise towards the ball and opens his feet. He’s making a careless move. Many penalties were given and goals were canceled in similar positions. He spreads his feet too much while trying to take place. He prevents his opponent from stepping on his feet and rising. It’s not a yellow card, but this position is a penalty.
Sea Shepherd: Last season, in the Antalyaspor match, Galatasaray’s goal was canceled during the attack phase because Icardi stepped on his opponent’s foot. The player from Hatayspor opens his feet more than naturally. Icardi will rise to the ball. The effect is there, 100 percent. He can’t jump. Undisputed penalty. No carom. Hatayspor player opens his feet deliberately. A clear violation. It is also easy to show, explain and prove.
Bahattin Duran: The most important issue is that the player from Hatayspor puts his foot down, takes risks and acts carelessly. The opened foot steps on Icardi’s foot. A clear violation. Stepping on foot and clear penalty. I’m thinking about the VAR side. When this ball comes to Icardi, it looks like Icardi won’t be able to hit it no matter how high he rises. I wonder why VAR didn’t intervene? I think it’s a clear penalty.
Fırat Aydınus: Both football players take full positions, they do not see each other, and as they are about to head for each other, the football player from Hatay steps on Icardi’s foot, albeit unintentionally, creating a situation that prevents Icardi from jumping. This is a clear penalty. This is definitely a position where VAR should be involved.
Erman Toroğlu: You will get through this, I won’t give a penalty.
Published Date: 09:58, 12 November 2023
2023-11-12 06:58:30
#Referee #commentators #evaluated #controversial #positions #HataysporGalatasaray #match #minute #sports #news #Sözcü
