“There were two penalties for us.” Juventus fans are not happy after the 1-1 home draw against Bologna. The match on the second day of the Serie A championship was followed by a row of controversies for a penalty claimed by the Bolognese for Iling-Junior’s intervention on Ndoye. The episode, which took place in the second half and with the result 0-1, was widely stigmatized by the rossoblu. The CEO Claudio Fenucci presented himself to the microphones of Dazn to underline the wrong suffered, the coach Thiago Motta replied with a blatant silence to the question on the subject. On Twitter, or rather on X, discussions on ‘Juve helped by the referees’ took off yesterday. The silence of the black and white club which in front of the cameras glossed over with the words of Marco Landucci (”We do not comment on the refereeing episodes”), collaborator of the coach Massimiliano Allegri, was however followed by the virtual voice of thousands of fans who on social networks proposed a revised and corrected version of the moviola. Not everyone agrees on the analysis of Iling-Junior’s intervention – for many it was a penalty, for some not – but many underline two other episodes that took place in the first half. After a handful of minutes, Chiesa is overwhelmed by Moro in the Bologna area: all regular for referee Di Bello, but the intervention leaves doubts that are also highlighted online by Aldo Serena, striker from the 80s and 90s. Lucumì’s intervention also ends in the social moviola, who deflects Weah’s low cross in a slide: regular intervention? penalty? The Sunday ‘moviolists’ are divided, with one certainty: “No one will talk about it…”.
2023-08-28 13:04:00
#JuveBologna #penalty #Ndoye #Chiesa #Weah #social #protest
