2024-07-11 10:00, akt.2024-07-11 16:35
publication
2024-07-11 10:00
replace
2024-07-11 16:35
share
The Speaker of the Sejm Szymon Hołownia introduced that on Thursday he’ll submit a notification to the prosecutor’s workplace about the opportunity of against the law being dedicated by Constitutional Tribunal Decide Krystyna Pawłowicz, who – as he justified – imposed a nice on MP Paweł Śliz, although he’s lined by parliamentary immunity.
photograph: Adam Chełstowski / / FORUM
This issues the state of affairs of 19 June this yr, when the Constitutional Tribunal thought of the primary of a sequence of presidential motions questioning – within the mode of subsequent management – the acts adopted by the Sejm after the expiry of the mandates of Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik as deputies. The Tribunal thought of the movement regarding the provisions on the NCBR.
The start of the listening to within the Constitutional Tribunal was stormy. The consultant of the Sejm, MP Paweł Śliz (Polska2050-TD) filed a movement to exclude judges Krystyna Pawłowicz and Stanisław Piotrowicz from the case; each motions have been dismissed. At the moment, Śliz said that his “continued presence would legitimize one thing with which he essentially disagrees as a consultant of the Sejm, MP and citizen” and left the room. Consequently, the Constitutional Tribunal fined Śliz PLN 3,000 for leaving the Constitutional Tribunal chamber firstly of the listening to “with out the consent of the presiding choose of the adjudicating panel”.
In reference to this example, the Speaker of the Sejm and the chief of Poland 2050 introduced that he would submit a notification of a doable crime dedicated by the presiding choose of the Constitutional Tribunal, Decide Krystyna Pawłowicz.
“The judges of the Constitutional Tribunal – this can be information to some – are additionally obliged to adjust to the legislation in power in Poland. In reference to the above, I’ll ship such a notification at this time to Prosecutor Basic Adam Bodnar and I hope that I’ll obtain a response on this matter,” Hołownia declared at a press convention on Thursday.
As he stated, the Constitutional Tribunal shouldn’t be a physique organizing the work of the Sejm, neither is it a physique standing above Polish legislation. “It has strictly outlined competences that it ought to implement. Nonetheless, the antics – as a result of for my part it must be put this manner – of judges who intend to punish in an administrative method the members of the Sejm who characterize the parliament, and subsequently the voters who elected this parliament, are completely unacceptable,” he added.
The Constitutional Tribunal expects an apology from the Speaker of the Sejm
“The Constitutional Tribunal has acquired with concern the most recent assertion by the Speaker of the Sejm, Szymon Hołownia, throughout a press convention,” the Constitutional Tribunal’s press service stated in a press release on Thursday.
“The assertion of Mr. Marshal misleads public opinion and violates the great identify of Professor Krystyna Pawłowicz” – the Constitutional Tribunal Press Workplace reported in response to Hołownia’s assertion. “We remind you that judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are unbiased within the train of their workplace and topic solely to the Structure, and illegal threats to submit an unjustified report of against the law are punishable” – it added.
The Constitutional Tribunal believes that the Speaker of the Sejm publicly advised an untruth, as a result of the choice to impose a disciplinary penalty for violating the authority and order of judicial actions on MP Śliz was issued by the Constitutional Tribunal composed of 5 judges, and it was introduced solely by Krystyna Pawłowicz because the chairwoman of the adjudicating panel.
“On this state of affairs, we anticipate a public apology from Marshal Hołownia, who, by intentionally deceptive public opinion, firstly, violated the great identify of the choose of the Constitutional Tribunal, Professor Krystyna Pawłowicz, accusing her of lack of information and competence,” the press service of the Constitutional Tribunal reported. “Secondly, by formulating an unfounded accusation of committing against the law, he failed to elucidate all of the factual and authorized circumstances, although he has certified authorized providers from whom he might have obtained data on this space,” it was written.
reb/ I used to be/ Godl/ he/ itm/ amac/
share
Subjects