/ world immediately information/ Because it appears, the work of the protesters won’t be simple, which, amongst different issues, is evidenced by the publication of September 21, 2020 in Dir.bg*, containing elements of an interview of the constitutional decide talked about in the identical to the digital media transitionstories.eu , the place it may be learn and considered in its entirety.**
In line with the out there info, the media in query arose, beginning on the finish of 2019 on the Web, at first within the type of a weblog, and subsequently as a website: The initiative, named “Tales from the transition” based on “About Us” by the identical of its crew consisting of its creator Alexander Kolarov for its mission is to gather along with a Fb group tales of individuals born earlier than 1989 and have aware recollections who have been witnesses and contributors within the transition from socialism to democracy earlier than November 10, 1989 and the next 2-3 years. In regards to the operator Katrin Terzieva, introduced on the launch as a teammate, there isn’t a info on the positioning apart from the joint picture of the woman with Kolarov, who represents solely himself. Anyway, the subject shouldn’t be who’s concerned in stated version, however the interview in query from the cited Dir publication. bg., which who is aware of why not solely there solely, however leaving apart one or two of the presenter’s questions in regards to the previous, as it’s based on the mission of his enterprise introduced by him, in the remainder of it and in transitionstories.eu it doesn’t concern something – one or one other “summary”, however is predominantly devoted to concrete optimistic manifestations and clear, undisguised safety of the present administration within the face of the federal government and the so-called parliament, right here and there of the judiciary and the prosecutor’s workplace. I don’t object that if any certainly one of a extra gifted thoughts pressed on, he would most likely discover in it one thing, nevertheless veiled as a semblance of criticism of this administration. For the plebs, it’s identified with out criticism – to maintain at bay with combat, starvation and…
In a earlier publish on one other event, I shared the opinion that as a citizen everyone seems to be free to specific any opinions, together with about any authorities of the nation. I additionally talked about there that as a decide, nevertheless, aside from at house or on the desk in a form of restricted circle along with his co-thinkers and like-minded folks, even within the deliberation room as such, he can categorical no matter opinions and assessments he needs in discussions along with his colleagues. However not publicly, at the very least whereas he’s a decide, incl. within the type of interviews for one or one other media. As a result of on this manner he discredits not solely himself, but additionally the establishments during which he participates and represents – on this case as a member of the so-called Constitutional Courtroom, to not point out the Venice Fee, and many others. As a result of aside from all the things, so far as it’s involved decide, thus violating the secrecy of judicial deliberations throughout and in reference to the choice of a given case. And, though not after, however prematurely publicly expressing his opinion and analysis concerning the actions of those that are potential events, even in future circumstances, it turns into clear to everybody a priori how he would rule on them. Adhuc sub iudice lis est*** is advisable for any decide to not restrict himself solely to circumstances which have already been initiated, together with no matter whether or not he has been designated as rapporteur in a single or one other such case, if he needs to make use of not solely with authority, and confidence in his impartiality. Likewise, a lawyer, such because the one in query, now a Justice of the Peace, is obliged to maintain the key of his client-trustee, no matter whether or not his case is already in court docket or not, and whether or not it can even get there. However what else may very well be anticipated from an appointee on the advice of the boss whose administration he feedback on and defends within the interview in query, from a president whose ear was publicly pulled by the prime minister and his brow measured with two fingers throughout his election as head of state, and on which event he turned his nostril up and declared that even when he had proposed, he would have been chosen as such. The secrets and techniques for them are what they know. As for publicity – all the things is allowed there, it would not matter if it’s a decide, who’s what, so long as it’s of their protection and towards all those that don’t agree and don’t approve of what and the way they’re doing. As soon as upon a time Blaga Dimitrova, might she relaxation in peace, cursed in an emotional outburst: “Whoever indicators the structure, might his hand wither.”, and after a number of months she agreed to be elected vice chairman below the identical Structure. Properly, she then left as an indication of disagreement with the then president due to the so-called “Bojanski Livadi”. However that is a topic for an additional subject.
*
**
*** The case remains to be within the palms of the decide
#Constitutional #decide #protection #governance
