The Brazilian and Colombian nationwide groups drew 1-1 within the final match of Group D of the 2024 Copa América in the US, during which a number of controversial performs had been offered.
In line with the factors of
The primary motion was within the nineteenth minute, within the purpose disallowed by Dávinson Sánchez, when the match was 1-0 in favor of the Brazilians.
Misplaced?
“Within the nineteenth minute, an attacker from the black workforce scores a purpose. In the meanwhile he performed the ball to him, his teammate was in an offside place. The VAR, in its protocol examine, confirms the offside place of the twenty third attacker who scores the purpose, who receives the ball from a free kick. Utilizing the digital traces device, it confirms the choice of offside discipline,” says the voiceover.
Penalty
Then, within the forty second minute, there was a play during which ahead Vinicius fought for the ball within the space with Colombian defender Daniel Muñoz.
“Within the forty second minute, there was a dispute for the ball contained in the penalty space by the black workforce (Colombia), a defender didn’t contact the ball and on account of the dispute, a reckless contact occurred for the motion,” the evaluation says.
“The referee fails to look at the motion and lets the sport proceed,” and makes it clear that within the VAR’s protocol, “he fails to determine that the defender (Daniel Muñoz) doesn’t contact the ball earlier than recklessly contacting the ahead.”
“Given this, the VAR incorrectly confirms the unique choice on the sector,” says the analyst.
“In these audios, each the VAR and his assistant agree that the Colombian defender does contact the ball and due to this fact, the motion shouldn’t be sanctioned as a penalty. “He pinches the ball when it goes to his foot after which he provides it momentum (to the ball), then the contact happens,” says www.futbolred.com
