It should be said at the outset that the data on the parameters (specifically the bars, the others are known) come from a number of sources and the individual sources differ slightly from each other. There are two possible reasons for this. The first is the fact that Intel may still slightly change specifications with respect to yield data and expected demand. The second reflects the fact that Intel provides three official values for a single-core boost for its processors: standard boost, 3.0 boost, and thermal velocity boost. Each other is about 100 MHz higher, so when one source talks about a 5.0 GHz boost, the other 5.1 GHz and the third 5.2 GHz, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they have inaccurate data. They only have data on another type of boost and they can all be correct.
However, the source does not always indicate which boost it is, so when looking at the jagged rows in the table (these are the Rocket Lake models), keep in mind that the data is somehow ± 100 MHz on average and until the slide with the final parameters escapes, it will not be completely clear.
| from. | I d. train. |
rate | L3 | GPU | TDP | price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core i9-11900K | 8 / 16 | 3,5 / 5,2 GHz | 16MB |  |
125W | ? | |
| Core i9-10900K | |
10/20 | 3,7 / 5,2 GHz | 20MB | |
125W | $488 |
| Core i9-10900KF | |
10/20 | 3,7 / 5,2 GHz | 20MB |  |
125W | $472 |
| Core i9-11900 | |
8 / 16 | 3,0 / 5,1 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i9-10900 | |
10/20 | 2,8 / 5,1 GHz | 20MB | |
65W | $439 |
| Core i9-11900F | |
8 / 16 | 3,0 / 5,1 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i9-10900F | |
10/20 | 2,8 / 5,1 GHz | 20MB | |
65W | $422 |
| Core i9-10900T | |
10/20 | 1,9 / 4,6 GHz | 20MB | |
35W | $439 |
| Core i9-10850K | |
10/20 | 3,6 / 5,1 GHz | 20MB | |
125W | $453 |
| Core i7-11700K | |
8 / 16 | 3,3 / 5,0 GHz | 16MB | |
125W | ? |
| Core i7-10700K | |
8 / 16 | 3,8 / 5,1 GHz | 16MB | |
125W | $374 |
| Core i7-11700KF | |
8 / 16 | 3,3 / 5,0 GHz | 16MB | |
125W | ? |
| Core i7-10700KF | |
8 / 16 | 3,8 / 5,1 GHz | 16MB | |
125W | $349 |
| Core i7-11700 | |
8 / 16 | 2,5 / 4,9 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i7-10700 | |
8 / 16 | 2,9 / 4,8 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | $323 |
| Core i7-11700F | |
8 / 16 | 2,5 / 4,9 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i7-10700F | |
8 / 16 | 2,9 / 4,8 GHz | 16MB | |
65W | $298 |
| Core i7-10700T | |
8 / 16 | 2,0 / 4,5 GHz | 16MB | |
35W | $325 |
| Core i5-11600K | |
6 / 12 | ≤4 / 4,9 GHz | 12MB | |
125W | ? |
| Core i5-10600K | |
6 / 12 | 4,1 / 4,8 GHz | 12MB | |
125W | $262 |
| Core i5-11600KF | |
6 / 12 | ≤4 / 4,9 GHz | 12MB | |
125W | ? |
| Core i5-10600KF | |
6 / 12 | 4,1 / 4,8 GHz | 12MB | |
125W | $237 |
| Core i5-10600 | |
6 / 12 | 3,3 / 4,8 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | $213 |
| Core i5-10600T | |
6 / 12 | 2,4 / 4,0 GHz | 12MB | |
35W | $213 |
| Core i5-10500 | |
6 / 12 | 3,1 / 4,5 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | $192 |
| Core i5-10500T | |
6 / 12 | 2,3 / 3,8 GHz | 12MB | |
35W | $192 |
| Core i5-11400 | |
6 / 12 | 2,6 / 4,4 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i5-10400 | |
6 / 12 | 2,9 / 4,3 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | $182 |
| Core i5-11400F | |
6 / 12 | 2,6 / 4,4 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | ? |
| Core i5-10400F | |
6 / 12 | 2,9 / 4,3 GHz | 12MB | |
65W | $157 |
| Core i5-10400T | |
6 / 12 | 2,0 / 3,6 GHz | 12MB | |
35W | $182 |
| Core i3-10320 | |
4 / 8 | 3,8 / 4,6 GHz | 8MB | |
65W | $154 |
| Core i3-10300 | |
4 / 8 | 3,7 / 4,4 GHz | 8MB | |
65W | $143 |
| Core i3-10300T | |
4 / 8 | 3,0 / 3,9 GHz | 8MB | |
35W | $143 |
| Core i3-10100 | |
4 / 8 | 3,6 / 4,3 GHz | 8MB | |
65W | $122 |
| Core i3-10100F | |
4 / 8 | 3,6 / 4,3 GHz | 8MB | |
65W | $97 |
| Core i3-10100T | |
4 / 8 | 3,0 / 3,8 GHz | 8MB | |
35W | $122 |
| Pentium G6600 | |
2 / 4 | 4,2 GHz | 4MB | |
58W | $86 |
| Pentium G6500 | |
2 / 4 | 4,1 GHz | 4MB | |
58W | $75 |
| Pentium G6500T | |
2 / 4 | 3,5 GHz | 4MB | |
35W | $75 |
| Pentium G6400 | |
2 / 4 | 4,0 GHz | 4MB | |
58W | $64 |
| Pentium G6400T | |
2 / 4 | 3,4 GHz | 4MB | |
35W | $64 |
| Celeron G5925 | |
2 / 2 | 3,6 GHz | 4MB | |
58W | $52 |
| Celeron G5920 | |
2 / 2 | 3,5 GHz | 2MB | |
58W | $52 |
| Celeron G5905 | |
2 / 2 | 3,5 GHz | 4MB | |
58W | $42 |
| Celeron G5905T | |
2 / 2 | 3,3 GHz | 4MB | |
35W | $42 |
| Celeron G5900 | |
2 / 2 | 3,4 GHz | 2MB | |
58W | $42 |
| Celeron G5900T | |
2 / 2 | 3,2 GHz | 2MB | |
35W | $42 |
Furthermore, the result of the Core i9-11900 sample (without K) running at 1.8 / 4.4 GHz in the CPU-Z test leaked. These beats are not definitive, the pieces sold should run at about 2.8 / 5.1 GHz. The reason for running the test at 4.4 GHz will be that at this value, in a single-core CPU-Z test, the processor has almost the same performance as the Core i9-10900K running at 5.2 GHz, which indicates an 18% higher IPC.
However, Intel did not use higher IPC architectures to reduce power consumption. TDP remains formally at the level Comet Lake (which means 125W TDP also for the six-core Core i5-11600K) with the proviso that the limits of PL2 will definitely not be reduced, but for some models they will remain and for some they may be increased.
Intel’s goal is with the generation Rocket Lake get back the crown of single-core power. Which may succeed, but it will probably bring with it new consumption records.
–
