Column throws a punch into the corner.
Interpret the Constitution. Just pushing or wading down? – Constitutional Amendment Process 2017
Arrived at a crucial turning point After MP Palang Pracharath collaborated with Sen. Propose a motion to a meeting in Parliament
To send the matter to the Constitutional Court ruling that the members of Parliament MPs – Senators have the power to amend the constitution to set up MPs to draft a new constitution?
Even at the meeting on February 9, there will be opposition MPs. Including the MPs, the Pride Thai Government Party, Democrat and Chatthai Pattana, will help discuss opposition.
Confirm the amendment to the constitution to have MPs. It is the power of parliamentarians in accordance with Section 256.
Submission to the court for a ruling may be viewed as a delay in kicking. Affecting the political situation both inside and outside the parliament
But in the end, the meeting still voted to agree on the 366 to 316 votes.
The resolution caused hailing criticism. That this group of parliamentary behavior, which consists of MPs, Palang Pracharat, and the old leg Dishonest in the first place
Starting from objection to the amendment of the constitution Continue with delaying the establishment of the Extraordinary Commission to consider the motion of the Constitution Amendment. Before voting for the first agenda And the latest is asking the Constitutional Court to decide
In spite of the draft amendment to appoint this MP, proposed by the coalition MPs with the Pracharat Party as the main party And the mover for the Constitutional Court ruling also signed the draft amendment as well.
More importantly, the draft has been approved by a majority of the first parliamentarians.
In addition, Article 124 of the Constitution provides for the resolution of a member of the National Assembly to be an absolute privilege for any person to sue him in any way.
In this case, there is no reasonable ground to ask the Constitutional Court to decide the power and duty to vote.
Unless you want to do it to kick back in time To the point where the board fell
From now on, have to see that Will the Constitutional Court take matters into consideration? If not, move on.
If accepted, they have to hope that the results of the diagnosis come out
How will it affect the process of obtaining the people’s constitution?
It’s a tiger’s hand.
–
