Home » today » World » Climate Researcher Sacked for Refusing to Fly: The Environmental Consequences and Moral Dilemma

Climate Researcher Sacked for Refusing to Fly: The Environmental Consequences and Moral Dilemma

Grimalda worked at the Kiel Institute for Worldwide Economy (IfW), which told him after the choice that he no longer had to come at all, reports the British newspaper The Guardian. Grimalda is still in the Solomon Islands. His boat leaves on Saturday.

‘It was worth it’

He has no regrets. “Refusing to fly cost me my job. It was worth paying this price,” he says.

In fact, Grimalda finds it ridiculous that his former employer does not understand that “the world’s most important ecosystems are collapsing, or have already collapsed.”

‘Moral unacceptable’

“Emitting 4.5 tons of CO2 during this period to meet the absurd demand to be physically in Kiel at short notice is morally unacceptable,” he says. “It embodies the ultimate privilege of the global elite.”

Grimalda has thought about challenging his dismissal, but decides against it. “It looks like the IfW is in the right.”

Response IfW

The IfW itself does not make any statements about this specific case, but says it ‘generally encourages climate-friendly travel’. “If flights are unavoidable, we will donate money to Atmosfair to offset emissions.”

The outward journey went the way Grimalda wanted. You can see it below:

2023-10-12 19:52:06
#Climate #scientist #fired #denied #flight

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.