Home » today » News » “Chronicle of a foretold death”? – Community

“Chronicle of a foretold death”? – Community

We are witnessing a kind of peeling of ITN footage, as we observed such blue peeling in the 1990s. Strangely, their leader should remember these “nineties” processes.

Everything on the topic:

The tremors in the coalition 225

And that (ITN flaking) didn’t start today, it didn’t start yesterday.

This is a process and the slightly more observant could see it in its infancy and foretell the development.

Reminder: a letter from a man of Slavi, who, even before (!!!) came to power wrote (follows without editorial intervention): “Your party in Pleven is conquered by the biggest adjusters, salesmen, assholes, intriguers and hypocrites in the city, and the most arrogant of them are in the immediate vicinity of your new District Coordinator and have already distributed government positions in the city! Former municipal councilors, dealers of votes passed and expelled from various political parties, found their haven under the wing of the new regional coordinator “.

ITN leader in Plovdiv resigns

“90% of the Municipal Coordinators, whom I had submitted and who worked hard for the cause, were replaced, and in their place were re-appointed old politicians who went through other parties. It’s good to know that three of them are closely linked to the MRF, two are former municipal councilors and Deputy. Mayors with public trust close to zero, and the wife and son of your coordinator for Cherven Bryag Municipality (who works for your sister and managed to convince her how bad I am and how I should be replaced, because I said that while I am District Coordinator, she will not be the Municipal Coordinator for Cherven Bryag) were in a common list of local elections 6 months ago with the new regional coordinator of the MRF for Pleven District, and even the son was a candidate for mayor from the same list! There, the commitment is so strong and visible that even the blind people in the municipality see it. “

↑↑↑ The month is February, the year 2021. Say it: a year and a half ago (not so much). Not long ago, right? As long as we stop having the political memory of a goldfish.

And the peeling began.

Next: Episode II “Taking Power”. They had great support, as, traditionally, the new projects receive, which we will code “The New Saviors” – a tradition started by Simeon and the designers behind him.

And then all sorts of experiments followed,

which we felt were attempts to sabotage themselves so that they would not have to do what they had promised to do. Series, started by a failed minister of Simeoncalled by the people Harry Potter, from tales about Macedonians in spacecontinued by anonymous people whose names have not yet been rememberedand people recognize them in conversations with each other as Paco Schnorhel i That Plagiarism From The Navel Of Sofia, I repeat: To Sofia!Toshko’s statements about “Krum’s laws“, dice journalist, confused the name of the party. Entering the parliament, they refused to vote in the majority vote, which is why they entered politics at all (Do you remember the referendum?). Slavi said: “And with a secure, calm and confident Parliament, this will happen immediately, which is why the party “There is such a people” was created, namely – the introduction of a majority electoral system. Everything in order“.

“A secure, calm and confident Parliament”… Was Mercury retrograde, did the noise in the plenary hall bother you?

GERB then said they wanted the vote. ITN, if they really wanted the majority vote, with their 51 deputies at the time and the 75 of GERB, made a majority of 126.

Now, (allegedly) those who want a majority vote, they have filled the parliament with Hristinka (according to Hristinka Ivanova, who is aware that no one knows her name and that she can return to the village), and in the previous two they have forced their deputies to sign that if they leave the parliamentary group they are obliged to leave the parliament as well.

Why is this important? I explain: the majority vote is so that we can vote for individuals, not for the party, and then it “wholesale” to enter some names. With the majority vote, we bring in people who we want and wait for them to work and be responsible, we know their names. If Party X starts to show off, they can leave it “on conscience” and continue the policy we told them we wanted.

Which of the following coincides with the leadership behavior in ITN?

And so it happened: the people who joined the party that demanded a majority vote left it “on conscience.” Just as the party, with its talk of a majority vote, made demands that it should be done. They obeyed the order they entered.

They called them traitors.

They called them people who had just left the coalition at a critical time and were offended that they were called traitors because they had allied themselves with those who would “scratch”. The irony is not lost here, is it?

And today there were still people who left: Kiril Simeonov and the leader of the ITN in Plovdiv Krassimir Donchev.

And since I said that this is not a process from today and not from yesterday, here is what Krassimir Donchev said: “I was thinking of resigning 3 months ago, but I stayed with the hope that some of the things in the local structure will change. Alas, nothing has happened since then.

Krassimir Donchev is the second coordinator for Plovdiv city, who leaves the ranks of ITN. The former Nikolina Despotova was removed in the autumn, and the coordinator for the South region, Ivaylo Vassilev, resigned in April.

To the non-happening Donchev listed the attitude towards the local structure and the dialogue on the part of Toshko Yordanov, the lack of any information and organization.

Toshko Yordanov’s name often appears in the conversations of those who left. Everyone has something to say about his behavior and attitude.

What Deyan Petkov said two days ago, who left the party: “I have never seen Slavi Trifonov. I was told that we are highly qualified button presses and we have no right to think, we were told that and if we don’t like to take … under our arms and go. This is not the normal behavior of a parliamentary group chairman. It’s all a matter of bad treatment for me. “

Something in „button presses“Andwe have no right to think“Tells you anything about the promises of ‘personalities’, ‘specialists’ and ‘experts’, as well as the talk of the ‘majority vote’?”

And about Toshko J.… What can we say? There are many people in Bulgaria (I don’t want to list the words: murderers, thieves, swindlers, spies, racketeers, he doesn’t go to the high level of parliamentarism in our country, right…?), But his classmate hadn’t denied anyone so far. from him publicly.

What can we expect in the coming days about the fate of… what to call it? —The ITN project, the ITN interest club, the ITN party…?

What? —A quick end and departure of the deputies en masse, “on conscience”, following what they joined the party (at least so they said) or remaining “on interest” and turning the breakup into a slow and unpleasant to watch process?

Alexander Tomov

2597
0

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.