Home » Business » Chromecast had better volume buttons than Google TV Streamer

Chromecast had better volume buttons than Google TV Streamer

Revisiting the Google TV Remote: Did Google Get Volume Controls Wrong?

Google’s latest remote for the Google TV Streamer has sparked a debate among streaming enthusiasts and tech professionals. While the new remote features several improvements, the placement of the volume buttons has raised eyebrows, leading many—including the author of this piece—to reflect on the strengths of the Chromecast remote‘s original design.

A Look Back at the Chromecast Remote

The Chromecast with Google TV was a groundbreaking release when it launched as Google’s first standalone streaming device equipped with a dedicated remote. The remote was thoughtfully designed, featuring a curved back, eight top-mounted buttons, and a navigational pad. Notably, the volume controls were located on the side—a decision that garnered mixed reactions from users. Some appreciated the ergonomic design, while others wished for a more conventional top-mounted configuration.

A recent upgrade to the Google TV Streamer remote has reignited this debate. The new remote includes additional features, but its shift to top-facing volume buttons has not impressed everyone. After personally using the Streamer remote across multiple home setups for several weeks, I have concluded that the Chromecast remote’s side-mounted volume buttons were, in fact, the superior choice.

The Ergonomics of Remote Design

For many cord-cutters, volume buttons are among the most frequently used controls. The side-mounted buttons on the original Chromecast remote may have appeared less intuitive at first glance, but they excel in functionality thanks to their placement. The unique contour of the remote—rounded at the bottom—allowed users to easily grip and adjust the volume without requiring them to lift the remote off the surface. This design choice ensured stability, encouraging a natural interaction with the device.

In contrast, the Google TV Streamer remote, although equipped with a more balanced weight distribution, has a tendency to rock when users attempt to adjust the volume. This motion compels users to pick up the remote, detracting from the seamless experience that many have come to expect from streaming devices.

Innovations and Shortcomings: A Mixed Bag

While the Google TV Streamer remote brings some added features, including a convenient shortcut button for quick access to apps, the decision to move volume controls to the top ultimately feels like a step backward. As it stands, this redesign has left some users, including myself, yearning for the intuitive volume control experience provided by the original Chromecast remote.

After adapting to both remotes, I find that while the Streamer remote may flaunt some modern upgrades, the fundamental functionality of its predecessor in relation to volume control remains unmatched.

Community Feedback: What’s Your Take?

The tech community is encouraged to weigh in on this topic. Do you prefer volume buttons on the side for ergonomic ease, or do you lean toward the visibility and accessibility of top-mounted controls? Sharing your experiences can help guide future innovations in remote design.

This Week’s Tech Buzz

In addition to the ongoing discussions about remote design, several other significant stories have emerged this week:

Google Confirms Early Release of Android 16

Google has announced an updated SDK schedule for 2025, alongside an early release date for Android 16, anticipated for August.

OnePlus 13 Officially Unveiled

The OnePlus 13 has been announced in China, showcasing impressive specs, including the Snapdragon 8 Elite, enhanced water resistance, and a larger battery, among other features.

Upcoming AI Integration in Chrome

A report surfaced detailing Google’s development of an AI agent, codenamed “Jarvis,” which will integrate seamlessly into Google Chrome to facilitate various tasks online.

For ongoing coverage and in-depth analysis of these and other tech stories, stay tuned to our website.

As the conversation evolves, we encourage you to share your thoughts on remote designs and what features matter most to you. Your input is invaluable as we navigate the fast-paced world of technology!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.